Skip to content

Efficacy of the Quell Wearable Device for Chronic Low Back Pain

Efficacy of the Quell Wearable Device for Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02944513
Enrollment
68
Registered
2016-10-26
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2022-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

This is a 1-year trial designed to gather information about the use of the Quell for persons with chronic musculoskeletal low back pain.

Detailed description

Research Objectives: This is a 1-year trial designed to gather information about the use of the Quell for persons with chronic musculoskeletal low back pain. The investigators hypothesize that those assigned to using the device will report reduced back pain compared with those in the control condition; with those using the device also showing improvement in sleep, mood, and level of activity. The investigators hypothesize that frequency of using the Quell (increased tolerability and adherence) will be correlated with greater reduction in pain. The investigators hypothesize that the device will be safe to use and will demonstrate a reduction in healthcare utilization (reduced clinic and Emergency Department visits). Finally, based on preliminary analyses limited by few subject numbers, the investigators will investigate whether certain individuals report greater benefit from using the Quell than others and, in particular, would predict that those with more intense and longer duration of pain will demonstrate most benefit.

Interventions

DEVICEQuell

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All participants will be adults age 21 or older and diagnosed with axial musculoskeletal back pain without radiculopathy. * Patients will be invited to participate if they own a smart phone (iPhone or Android device) and are able to download the pain app and the Quell Relief program app onto their device. * Patients will also be included if they: 1. have chronic pain for \> 3 months' duration 2. average 4 or greater on a pain intensity scale of 0 to 10 3. are able to speak and understand English.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients will be excluded from participation if they meet any of the following criteria: 1. diagnosis of cancer or any other malignant disease 2. acute osteomyelitis or acute bone disease 3. present or past Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-V diagnosis of schizophrenia, delusional disorder, psychotic disorder, or dissociative disorder that would be judged to interfere with study participation 4. pregnancy 5. any clinically unstable systemic illness judged to interfere with treatment 6. a pain condition requiring urgent surgery 7. an active substance use disorder, such as cocaine or IV heroin use, (positive on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; M.I.N.I. v.5.0) that would interfere with study participation 8. any prescription opioid use for pain 9. have an implanted cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or other implanted device. All subjects will be asked to not change their treatment during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity (Average)3 monthsRate average pain intensity using visual analog scale on a scale of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Average Pain Interference3 monthsThis measures the average pain interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with others, sleep and enjoyment of life using visual analogue scale. On a scale of 0-10, 0 is no interference and 10 is extreme interference. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Pain Disability Index3 monthsThe Pain Disability Index (PDI) a simple and rapid instrument for measuring the impact that pain has on the ability of a person to participate in essential life activities. For each of the 7 categories of life activity listed, a score of 0 means no disability at all, and a score of 10 signifies that all of the activities in which you would normally be involved have been totally disrupted or prevented by your pain. The minimal index is 0 and maximal index is 70. The higher the index the greater the person's disability due to pain meaning a worse outcome.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale3 monthsPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) has thirteen statements describing different thoughts and feelings that may be associated with pain. Using a 5-point scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time), people indicate the degree to which they have these thoughts and feelings when they are experiencing pain. The sum has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 52. Higher scores mean high levels of pain catastrophizing and worse outcome.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Total Score3 monthsHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is commonly used to determine the levels of anxiety and depression that a person is experiencing. The HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. This outcome is a total score, which was calculated by adding the anxiety score and the depression score. Total score ranges from 0-42, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-study Helpfulness Questionnaire3 monthsThe questionnaire asked the participants to rate how helpful was the device for the low back pain on a scale of 0-10. 0 is not helpful at all and 10 is very helpful. Higher value means better outcome.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
Subjects will receive the Quell device Quell
35
Control
Subjects will not receive the Quell device
33
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimentalTotalControl
Age, Continuous48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
BMI30.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
30.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
30.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
34 Participants65 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Pain Average5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
5.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Pain Duration12.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
13.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
13.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants53 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants41 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants27 Participants10 Participants
Weight186.5 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60
182.7 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.4
175.0 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 33
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Average Pain Interference

This measures the average pain interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with others, sleep and enjoyment of life using visual analogue scale. On a scale of 0-10, 0 is no interference and 10 is extreme interference. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: For the experimental group, 35 subjects were consented, 4 subjects dropped out, 2 subjects did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 29 subjects were analyzed. For the control group, 33 subjects were consented, 1 subject dropped out, 1 subject did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 31 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalAverage Pain Interference3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
ControlAverage Pain Interference5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Primary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Total Score

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is commonly used to determine the levels of anxiety and depression that a person is experiencing. The HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. This outcome is a total score, which was calculated by adding the anxiety score and the depression score. Total score ranges from 0-42, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: For the experimental group, 35 subjects were consented, 4 subjects dropped out, 2 subjects did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 29 subjects were analyzed. For the control group, 33 subjects were consented, 1 subject dropped out, 1 subject did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 31 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Total Score15.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
ControlHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Total Score16.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Primary

Pain Catastrophizing Scale

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) has thirteen statements describing different thoughts and feelings that may be associated with pain. Using a 5-point scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time), people indicate the degree to which they have these thoughts and feelings when they are experiencing pain. The sum has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 52. Higher scores mean high levels of pain catastrophizing and worse outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: For the experimental group, 35 subjects were consented, 4 subjects dropped out, 2 subjects did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 29 subjects were analyzed. For the control group, 33 subjects were consented, 1 subject dropped out, 1 subject did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 31 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalPain Catastrophizing Scale13.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
ControlPain Catastrophizing Scale25.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Primary

Pain Disability Index

The Pain Disability Index (PDI) a simple and rapid instrument for measuring the impact that pain has on the ability of a person to participate in essential life activities. For each of the 7 categories of life activity listed, a score of 0 means no disability at all, and a score of 10 signifies that all of the activities in which you would normally be involved have been totally disrupted or prevented by your pain. The minimal index is 0 and maximal index is 70. The higher the index the greater the person's disability due to pain meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: For the experimental group, 35 subjects were consented, 4 subjects dropped out, 2 subjects did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 29 subjects were analyzed. For the control group, 33 subjects were consented, 1 subject dropped out, 1 subject did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 31 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalPain Disability Index26.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
ControlPain Disability Index34.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Primary

Pain Intensity (Average)

Rate average pain intensity using visual analog scale on a scale of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: For the experimental group, 35 subjects were consented, 4 subjects dropped out, 2 subjects did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 29 subjects were analyzed. For the control group, 33 subjects were consented, 1 subject dropped out, 1 subject did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 31 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalPain Intensity (Average)4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
ControlPain Intensity (Average)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Post-study Helpfulness Questionnaire

The questionnaire asked the participants to rate how helpful was the device for the low back pain on a scale of 0-10. 0 is not helpful at all and 10 is very helpful. Higher value means better outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: For the experimental group, 35 subjects were consented, 4 subjects dropped out, 2 subjects did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 29 subjects were analyzed. For the control group, 33 subjects were consented, 1 subject dropped out, 1 subject did not complete the 3-month questionnaire, so 31 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalPost-study Helpfulness Questionnaire4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
ControlPost-study Helpfulness QuestionnaireNA score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026