Skip to content

FLOW Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multi-vessel ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

FLOW Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multi-vessel ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02943954
Acronym
FLOWER-MI
Enrollment
1170
Registered
2016-10-25
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2021-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myocardial Infarction, Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Multi Vessel Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Fractional Flow Reserve

Brief summary

Although current guidelines recommend fractional flow reserve (FFR) to identify haemodynamically relevant coronary lesion(s) in stable patients when evidence of ischaemia is not available (Class I, Level of Evidence: A), no published study has assessed the usefulness of FFR to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD). The main objective of this study is to determine whether, in STEMI patients with MVD amenable to PCI, the use of FFR in addition to angiography will improve cardiovascular outcomes, compared with the current practice of angiography- guided PCI, by improving the appropriateness of revascularisations by assessing the relevance of non-culprit lesions in the context of STEMI with multivessel coronary artery disease. The secondary objective is to assess the safety and the cost-effectiveness of the FFR-guided strategy compared to the angiography-guided strategy.

Detailed description

The optimal revascularisation strategy in STEMI patients with MVD is currently debated. Recent data suggest that MV-PCI may be the most appropriate option for treating such patients. Consequently, the real challenge becomes to define what MVD is, in the context of acute MI, in order to limit revascularisation by PCI to vessels that truly need it. Visual estimation of the degree of coronary stenoses is a poor indicator of their haemodynamic severity. FFR is precisely designed and recommended in current guidelines to provide objective guidance for the functional assessment of lesion severity during coronary angiography in stable patients, but it has not been validated in STEMI patients with MVD. The purpose of the present trial will therefore be to investigate the relevance of FFR to guide the revascularisation management of patients at the acute stage of STEMI. STEMI patients with successful culprit lesion PCI (primary, rescue or pharmaco-invasive) and ≥ 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimate, in which revascularization is contemplated and judged amenable to PCI in at least one additional non-culprit lesion will be randomized into two groups: angiography-guided PCI or FFR-guided PCI. If the patient is randomized to the angiography-guided PCI, all the lesions indicated beforehand will be treated. If the patient is randomized to the FFR-guided PCI, measurements of FFR of non-infarct related lesion(s) will be performed and only those lesions with a FFR ≤ 0.80 will be treated. The use of drug-eluting stents is encouraged in both strategies. All patients will receive optimal medical therapy (including dual antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers, statins, ACE-I or ARB) as recommended in international guidelines in both strategies. Clinical follow-up will be performed at discharge, 30-day, 6 month and one-year. Rates of major adverse cardiac events, functional class and number of anti-anginal medications used will be collected. If the patient has been rehospitalized since index hospital discharge, the discharge summary and all relevant information will be collected.

Interventions

Sponsors

Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ministry of Health, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* STEMI patients ≥ 18 years old with successful culprit lesion PCI (primary, rescue or pharmaco-invasive) and ≥ 50% stenosis judged amenable to PCI in at least one additional non-culprit lesion * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with cardiogenic shock (SBP \< 90 mmHg with clinical signs of low output or patients requiring inotropic agents) * Patients with MVD referred to surgery for CABG or treatment of acute complications (e.g. ventricular septal rupture) * Patients with one-vessel disease * Previous coronary bypass surgery * Extremely tortuous, calcified coronary vessels or chronic total occlusion (CTO) * Life expectancy \< 2 years * Patients with known hypersensitivity to adenosine * Pregnancy * Participation in another interventional therapeutic study at the same time or within 3 months prior to the beginning of the present study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of major adverse cardiac events1 yearNumber of deaths, myocardial infarctions and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularizations at one year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial infarctions1 year
Repeat revascularizations1 year
Rate of nonculprit artery target lesion treated by urgent revascularization1 year
Rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 6 months30 days and 6 months
Rehospitalization for angina during the follow up period1 year
Deaths1 year
Functional class at 1 year1 yearThe functional class is assessed with the use of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification of angina.
Health-related quality of life1 yearHealth-related quality of life is assessed by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions \[EQ-5D\] questionnaires
Anti-anginal medications used1 month, 6 months and 1 yearNumber of anti-anginal medications used
Cost effectiveness1 yearIncremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) using the composite endpoint (all-cause death, myocardial infarctions and repeat revascularizations).
Cost utility1 yearIncremental cost-utility ration (ICUR) using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
Procedure time5 days

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026