Skip to content

Vaginal Packing After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Vaginal Packing After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy; Patient Pain and Satisfaction in Short Follow-up and Surgery Outcome and Complications in One Year Follow-up

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02943525
Enrollment
253
Registered
2016-10-24
Start date
2016-11-14
Completion date
2023-07-02
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Vaginal Packing Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Keywords

vaginal packing, pelvic organ prolapse, pain and satisfaction

Brief summary

Vaginal packing is used routinely following vaginal reconstructive surgery, however, no recommendation regarding vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy exists. Despite little data to support the practice, purported benefits better positioning and fixation of the mesh, improving incorporation of the mesh by its fixation and reduced blood loss. Patients often complain of discomfort associated with the packing or its removal. The aim of this randomized controlled is to compare the subjective impressions of pain and bother in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy treated with and without packing. The investigators also aim to assess differences in postoperative bacteriuria, urine retention and hemoglobin levels on day 5 after the surgery and surgery outcome and complications at one year after the surgery in those with and without packing.

Interventions

Packing vagina with a Boric acid soaked gauze at the end of surgery

Sponsors

Charles University, Czech Republic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without a suburethral sling * Pelvic organ prolapse stage \> 2 * Speak and read Czech * Can to understand the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Any other surgery than sacrocolpopexy * Concurrent hysterectomy or opening of the vagina during the surgery. * Vaginal, uterine, cervical or ovarian malignancy * Clotting disorder, taking anticoagulation * Having intraoperative blood loss greater than 500 ml

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain assessed using VASThe first post-operative day before extraction of the packingVisual analog scale (VAS)
Satisfaction with the overall postoperative course assessed using VASPostoperative day 5VAS
Prolapse recurrence1 year after the surgeryPelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) classification - the most descending compartment \>-1cm from hymen
Surgery related complicationsFrom the surgery until 1 year after the surgeryAccording to the International Continence Society / International UroGynecology Association Joint Terminology and Classification Report of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) \& grafts in female pelvic floor surgery
Postoperative pain assessed using the McGill QuestionnaireThe first post-operative day before extraction of the packingMcGill Questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of analgesics usedFrom the end of the surgery until the first postoperative day
Positive urine culturePostoperative day 5
Satisfaction with surgery assessed using VASPostoperative day 1 before packing extractionVAS

Countries

Czechia

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZdenek Rusavy, MD PhD

Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Charles University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026