Electronic Health Records, Inpatient Facility Diagnoses, Outpatient, Physician-Patient Relations
Conditions
Keywords
patient portal, Health Information Technology, Electronic Health Records, Inpatient Care, Outpatient Care, Patient Engagement
Brief summary
A large-scale randomized control trial (RCT) of the impact and use of an inpatient tablet-based patient portal embedded in a larger mixed methods study to examine changes in patient experiences and outcomes, and subsequent ambulatory patient portal usage.
Detailed description
The appropriate use of technology to actively engage with patients who suffer from multiple chronic conditions, called multimorbidity, is one of the frontiers of both research and practice. For multimorbid patients, engagement in disease management activities is particularly critical, and evidence shows that enhanced patient self-management can lead to better control of chronic illness. One tool finding increasing use is the patient portal, and its pervasiveness is supported by virtue of its role as a component of the Meaningful Use criteria. A patient portal is a tethered personal health record (tPHR) that links to the patient's electronic health record, facilitating communication and engagement activities with healthcare providers. While most tPHRs have been focused on outpatient activities, a new class of tools focused on the inpatient experience has begun deployment in 2014. In response, this study supports the conduct of the first, large-scale randomized control trial (RCT) of the impact and use of an inpatient tablet-based patient portal embedded in a larger mixed methods study to examine changes in patient experiences and outcomes, and subsequent ambulatory patient portal usage. The investigators aim to study how access to a patient portal tailored to the inpatient stay can improve patient experience and increase patient engagement by improving patients' perception of the process of care while in the hospital (patient experience), increasing patients' self-efficacy for managing their chronic conditions (patient engagement), and facilitating use of a patient portal for care management activities after discharge (patient engagement). The study site is a world-class healthcare facility with the ability to provide access to a patient portal designed specifically for the inpatient experience, bridging to outside the hospital after discharge. Currently, this inpatient technology exists in only one other hospital in the US, but the investigators expect that as inpatient PHRs become more readily available, the need for clarity on this issue will only increase. The investigator's evaluation is a mixed-methods design consisting of primary data collection through surveys and interviews throughout the study period, and secondary data collection from the electronic health record and health system metadata. This study will offer insight into a potentially important mechanism to facilitate patient self-management.
Interventions
Participants receives an in person visit from an technology navigator who helps to explain the technology to the patient.
Participants receives a visit from a patient navigator who helps to explain how to navigate the hospital system (active control).
Patient receives full-suite access to an inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication enabled.
Patient receives a limited access version of the inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication disabled.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patient accepted MyChart Bedside tablet * patient available in their room * capable of providing informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patient in a pilot unit where Full Tech was available prior to study start * Patient was less than 18 years of age
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | 15 days after discharge. | Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: What kind of activities did you use the table for? (mark all that apply). |
| Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 15 days after discharge | Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with the interactions you had with your healthcare professionals? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses. |
| Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management | 15 days after discharge. | Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: All of my questions about managing my health, including my medications, were addressed before I left the hospital.. Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses. |
| Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | 15 days after discharge. | Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: If you had a question about your care while you were in the hospital, what steps did you take to find an answer? (mark all that apply). |
| Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 15 days after discharge | Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with how well your healthcare professionals responded to your concerns? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses. |
| Inpatient Portal Use Frequency | At hospital discharge. | The count of MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) sessions for the admission associated with study enrollment. |
| Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use | At hospital discharge. | Based on the use of all available MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) functions, a comprehensive inpatient portal user was one who used all three functions - for patients in the low tech assignment - or used eight or more functions - for patients in the high tech assignment. |
| Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | At hospital discharge. | For each MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) function available to patients assigned to high tech, a proportion of total use is calculated for each patient as the sum of actions in a given function divided for the total sum of user actions during the hospital admission associated with study enrollment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | 3 months post-discharge | Count of MyChart (outpatient portal) sessions (based on log file analysis). |
| Self-Efficacy | Baseline | 5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes. |
| Outpatient Portal Adoption | 3 months post-discharge | MyChart (outpatient portal) accounts activated by participants after their enrollment in the study (based on log file analysis). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Of the 3,782 enrolled participants, 2,892 met the study inclusion criteria and were randomized to one of the four study arms. Of those excluded: * 734 had an enrollment admission \< 3 days; * 17 had no inpatient portal use on record; * 139 switched Tech assignment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch Patient receives the full version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives training/intervention from technology navigator
High Touch: Participants receives an in person visit from an technology navigator who helps to explain the technology to the patient.
High Tech: Patient receives full-suite access to an inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication enabled. | 1,242 |
| Low Tech, High Touch Patient receives the non-interactional version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives training/intervention from technology navigator
High Touch: Participants receives an in person visit from an technology navigator who helps to explain the technology to the patient.
Low Tech: Patient receives a limited access version of the inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication disabled. | 470 |
| High Tech, Low Touch Patient receives the full version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives online training, only
Low Touch: Participants receives a visit from a patient navigator who helps to explain how to navigate the hospital system (active control).
High Tech: Patient receives full-suite access to an inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication enabled. | 905 |
| Low Tech, Low Touch Patient receives the non-interactional version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives online training, only
Low Touch: Participants receives a visit from a patient navigator who helps to explain how to navigate the hospital system (active control).
Low Tech: Patient receives a limited access version of the inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication disabled. | 275 |
| Total | 2,892 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | High Tech, High Touch | Low Tech, High Touch | High Tech, Low Touch | Low Tech, Low Touch | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 46 years | 48 years | 47 years | 48 years | 47 years |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | 1 units on a scale | 1 units on a scale | 2 units on a scale | 2 units on a scale | 1 units on a scale |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 225 Participants | 81 Participants | 186 Participants | 58 Participants | 550 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 41 Participants | 21 Participants | 44 Participants | 15 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 976 Participants | 368 Participants | 675 Participants | 202 Participants | 2221 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 709 Participants | 256 Participants | 521 Participants | 155 Participants | 1641 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 533 Participants | 214 Participants | 384 Participants | 120 Participants | 1251 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use
Based on the use of all available MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) functions, a comprehensive inpatient portal user was one who used all three functions - for patients in the low tech assignment - or used eight or more functions - for patients in the high tech assignment.
Time frame: At hospital discharge.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use | 697 Participants |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use | 292 Participants |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use | 253 Participants |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use | 104 Participants |
Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use
For each MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) function available to patients assigned to high tech, a proportion of total use is calculated for each patient as the sum of actions in a given function divided for the total sum of user actions during the hospital admission associated with study enrollment.
Time frame: At hospital discharge.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Dining on Demand | 0.20 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Tutorial | 0.16 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | To Learn | 0.02 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | My Health | 0.11 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Happening Soon | 0.39 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Notes | 0.00 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Messages | 0.03 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | I Would Like | 0.00 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.01 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | MyChart | 0.03 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Taking Care of Me | 0.05 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | I Would Like | 0.00 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.01 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Dining on Demand | 0.22 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Notes | 0.00 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Tutorial | 0.19 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | To Learn | 0.01 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Taking Care of Me | 0.04 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Messages | 0.03 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | My Health | 0.10 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | MyChart | 0.03 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use | Happening Soon | 0.37 Proportion of total use | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
Inpatient Portal Use Frequency
The count of MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) sessions for the admission associated with study enrollment.
Time frame: At hospital discharge.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Use Frequency | 29 Inpatient portal sessions | Standard Deviation 31 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Inpatient Portal Use Frequency | 21 Inpatient portal sessions | Standard Deviation 18 |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Inpatient Portal Use Frequency | 29 Inpatient portal sessions | Standard Deviation 36 |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Inpatient Portal Use Frequency | 20 Inpatient portal sessions | Standard Deviation 26 |
Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions
Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: If you had a question about your care while you were in the hospital, what steps did you take to find an answer? (mark all that apply).
Time frame: 15 days after discharge.
Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked my doctor | 167 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked a nurse | 217 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked hospital staff | 58 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I searched online | 70 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | Other | 16 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I did not have questions | 8 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I did not have questions | 1 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I searched online | 21 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked my doctor | 66 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked hospital staff | 26 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked a nurse | 76 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | Other | 5 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked a nurse | 94 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked hospital staff | 30 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I searched online | 39 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I did not have questions | 3 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | Other | 7 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked my doctor | 82 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | Other | 1 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I did not have questions | 1 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked a nurse | 29 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I searched online | 9 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked my doctor | 26 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions | I asked hospital staff | 10 Patients |
Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management
Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: All of my questions about managing my health, including my medications, were addressed before I left the hospital.. Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Time frame: 15 days after discharge.
Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management | 112 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management | 37 Participants with positive response |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management | 118 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management | 37 Participants with positive response |
Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities
Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: What kind of activities did you use the table for? (mark all that apply).
Time frame: 15 days after discharge.
Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | MyChart Bedside | 217 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Social media | 41 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | None of the above | 8 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Research health issues | 114 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Watch movies/TV | 20 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | 33 Patients | |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Communicate with family | 20 Patients |
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Play games | 65 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Research health issues | 34 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Social media | 9 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Watch movies/TV | 6 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Play games | 27 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | MyChart Bedside | 73 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Communicate with family | 5 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | None of the above | 6 Patients |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | 9 Patients | |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Play games | 31 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Research health issues | 52 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Social media | 22 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Communicate with family | 9 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | 14 Patients | |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | MyChart Bedside | 93 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Watch movies/TV | 7 Patients |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | None of the above | 5 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | None of the above | 3 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | 5 Patients | |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Social media | 9 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Watch movies/TV | 3 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Communicate with family | 3 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Play games | 14 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | MyChart Bedside | 26 Patients |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities | Research health issues | 15 Patients |
Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals
Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 6-month Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with the interactions you had with your healthcare professionals? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Time frame: 6 months after discharge
Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 153 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 63 Participants with positive response |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 127 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 33 Participants with positive response |
Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals
Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with the interactions you had with your healthcare professionals? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Time frame: 15 days after discharge
Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 150 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 50 Participants with positive response |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 59 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals | 22 Participants with positive response |
Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals
Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 6-month Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In the past 6 months, how satisfied were you with how well your healthcare professionals responded to your concerns? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Time frame: 6 months after discharge
Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 139 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 59 Participants with positive response |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 117 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 24 Participants with positive response |
Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals
Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with how well your healthcare professionals responded to your concerns? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Time frame: 15 days after discharge
Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 142 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 49 Participants with positive response |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 59 Participants with positive response |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals | 23 Participants with positive response |
Outpatient Portal Adoption
MyChart (outpatient portal) accounts activated by participants after their enrollment in the study (based on log file analysis).
Time frame: 3 months post-discharge
Population: Participants without an active outpatient portal account at the time of their enrollment in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Outpatient Portal Adoption | 218 Participants |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Outpatient Portal Adoption | 66 Participants |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Outpatient Portal Adoption | 126 Participants |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Outpatient Portal Adoption | 29 Participants |
Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use
Count of MyChart (outpatient portal) sessions (based on log file analysis).
Time frame: 3 months post-discharge
Population: Patients with an active outpatient portal account; either predating their participation in the study (Previous users) or activated after study enrollment (New users).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | New users | 21 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 32 |
| High Tech, High Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | Previous users | 35 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 41 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | Previous users | 41 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 44 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | New users | 19 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 21 |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | New users | 17 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 25 |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | Previous users | 38 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 48 |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | New users | 20 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 29 |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use | Previous users | 37 Outpatient portal sessions | Standard Error 38 |
Self-Efficacy
5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Patients who completed the self-efficacy section of the survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Self-Efficacy
5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes.
Time frame: 15 days post-discharge
Population: Patients who completed the self-efficacy section of the survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Self-Efficacy
5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes.
Time frame: 6 months post-discharge
Population: Patients who completed the self-efficacy section of the survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Tech, High Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Low Tech, High Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| High Tech, Low Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Low Tech, Low Touch | Self-Efficacy | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |