Skip to content

High Tech and High Touch (HT2): Transforming Patient Engagement Through Portal Technology at the Bedside

High Tech and High Touch (HT2): Transforming Patient Engagement Through Portal Technology at the Bedside

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02943109
Enrollment
3782
Registered
2016-10-24
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Electronic Health Records, Inpatient Facility Diagnoses, Outpatient, Physician-Patient Relations

Keywords

patient portal, Health Information Technology, Electronic Health Records, Inpatient Care, Outpatient Care, Patient Engagement

Brief summary

A large-scale randomized control trial (RCT) of the impact and use of an inpatient tablet-based patient portal embedded in a larger mixed methods study to examine changes in patient experiences and outcomes, and subsequent ambulatory patient portal usage.

Detailed description

The appropriate use of technology to actively engage with patients who suffer from multiple chronic conditions, called multimorbidity, is one of the frontiers of both research and practice. For multimorbid patients, engagement in disease management activities is particularly critical, and evidence shows that enhanced patient self-management can lead to better control of chronic illness. One tool finding increasing use is the patient portal, and its pervasiveness is supported by virtue of its role as a component of the Meaningful Use criteria. A patient portal is a tethered personal health record (tPHR) that links to the patient's electronic health record, facilitating communication and engagement activities with healthcare providers. While most tPHRs have been focused on outpatient activities, a new class of tools focused on the inpatient experience has begun deployment in 2014. In response, this study supports the conduct of the first, large-scale randomized control trial (RCT) of the impact and use of an inpatient tablet-based patient portal embedded in a larger mixed methods study to examine changes in patient experiences and outcomes, and subsequent ambulatory patient portal usage. The investigators aim to study how access to a patient portal tailored to the inpatient stay can improve patient experience and increase patient engagement by improving patients' perception of the process of care while in the hospital (patient experience), increasing patients' self-efficacy for managing their chronic conditions (patient engagement), and facilitating use of a patient portal for care management activities after discharge (patient engagement). The study site is a world-class healthcare facility with the ability to provide access to a patient portal designed specifically for the inpatient experience, bridging to outside the hospital after discharge. Currently, this inpatient technology exists in only one other hospital in the US, but the investigators expect that as inpatient PHRs become more readily available, the need for clarity on this issue will only increase. The investigator's evaluation is a mixed-methods design consisting of primary data collection through surveys and interviews throughout the study period, and secondary data collection from the electronic health record and health system metadata. This study will offer insight into a potentially important mechanism to facilitate patient self-management.

Interventions

OTHERHigh Touch

Participants receives an in person visit from an technology navigator who helps to explain the technology to the patient.

OTHERLow Touch

Participants receives a visit from a patient navigator who helps to explain how to navigate the hospital system (active control).

OTHERHigh Tech

Patient receives full-suite access to an inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication enabled.

OTHERLow Tech

Patient receives a limited access version of the inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication disabled.

Sponsors

Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient accepted MyChart Bedside tablet * patient available in their room * capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient in a pilot unit where Full Tech was available prior to study start * Patient was less than 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities15 days after discharge.Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: What kind of activities did you use the table for? (mark all that apply).
Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals15 days after dischargeQuestions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with the interactions you had with your healthcare professionals? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management15 days after discharge.Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: All of my questions about managing my health, including my medications, were addressed before I left the hospital.. Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions15 days after discharge.Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: If you had a question about your care while you were in the hospital, what steps did you take to find an answer? (mark all that apply).
Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals15 days after dischargeQuestions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with how well your healthcare professionals responded to your concerns? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.
Inpatient Portal Use FrequencyAt hospital discharge.The count of MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) sessions for the admission associated with study enrollment.
Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of UseAt hospital discharge.Based on the use of all available MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) functions, a comprehensive inpatient portal user was one who used all three functions - for patients in the low tech assignment - or used eight or more functions - for patients in the high tech assignment.
Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseAt hospital discharge.For each MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) function available to patients assigned to high tech, a proportion of total use is calculated for each patient as the sum of actions in a given function divided for the total sum of user actions during the hospital admission associated with study enrollment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use3 months post-dischargeCount of MyChart (outpatient portal) sessions (based on log file analysis).
Self-EfficacyBaseline5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes.
Outpatient Portal Adoption3 months post-dischargeMyChart (outpatient portal) accounts activated by participants after their enrollment in the study (based on log file analysis).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of the 3,782 enrolled participants, 2,892 met the study inclusion criteria and were randomized to one of the four study arms. Of those excluded: * 734 had an enrollment admission \< 3 days; * 17 had no inpatient portal use on record; * 139 switched Tech assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Tech, High Touch
Patient receives the full version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives training/intervention from technology navigator High Touch: Participants receives an in person visit from an technology navigator who helps to explain the technology to the patient. High Tech: Patient receives full-suite access to an inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication enabled.
1,242
Low Tech, High Touch
Patient receives the non-interactional version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives training/intervention from technology navigator High Touch: Participants receives an in person visit from an technology navigator who helps to explain the technology to the patient. Low Tech: Patient receives a limited access version of the inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication disabled.
470
High Tech, Low Touch
Patient receives the full version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives online training, only Low Touch: Participants receives a visit from a patient navigator who helps to explain how to navigate the hospital system (active control). High Tech: Patient receives full-suite access to an inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication enabled.
905
Low Tech, Low Touch
Patient receives the non-interactional version of MyChart Bedside. Patient receives online training, only Low Touch: Participants receives a visit from a patient navigator who helps to explain how to navigate the hospital system (active control). Low Tech: Patient receives a limited access version of the inpatient patient portal with bi-directional communication disabled.
275
Total2,892

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh Tech, High TouchLow Tech, High TouchHigh Tech, Low TouchLow Tech, Low TouchTotal
Age, Continuous46 years48 years47 years48 years47 years
Charlson Comorbidity Index1 units on a scale1 units on a scale2 units on a scale2 units on a scale1 units on a scale
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
225 Participants81 Participants186 Participants58 Participants550 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
41 Participants21 Participants44 Participants15 Participants121 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
976 Participants368 Participants675 Participants202 Participants2221 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
709 Participants256 Participants521 Participants155 Participants1641 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
533 Participants214 Participants384 Participants120 Participants1251 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Inpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use

Based on the use of all available MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) functions, a comprehensive inpatient portal user was one who used all three functions - for patients in the low tech assignment - or used eight or more functions - for patients in the high tech assignment.

Time frame: At hospital discharge.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use697 Participants
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use292 Participants
High Tech, Low TouchInpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use253 Participants
Low Tech, Low TouchInpatient Portal Comprehensiveness of Use104 Participants
Primary

Inpatient Portal Functions Proportion of Use

For each MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) function available to patients assigned to high tech, a proportion of total use is calculated for each patient as the sum of actions in a given function divided for the total sum of user actions during the hospital admission associated with study enrollment.

Time frame: At hospital discharge.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseDining on Demand0.20 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.17
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseTutorial0.16 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.18
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseTo Learn0.02 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.04
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseMy Health0.11 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.15
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseHappening Soon0.39 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.23
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseNotes0.00 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseMessages0.03 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.04
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseI Would Like0.00 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.01
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseMyChart0.03 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.04
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseTaking Care of Me0.05 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.04
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseI Would Like0.00 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.01
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseDining on Demand0.22 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.2
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseNotes0.00 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseTutorial0.19 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.22
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseTo Learn0.01 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.05
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseTaking Care of Me0.04 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.05
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseMessages0.03 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.05
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseMy Health0.10 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.17
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseMyChart0.03 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.04
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Functions Proportion of UseHappening Soon0.37 Proportion of total useStandard Deviation 0.25
Primary

Inpatient Portal Use Frequency

The count of MyChart Bedside (inpatient portal) sessions for the admission associated with study enrollment.

Time frame: At hospital discharge.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Use Frequency29 Inpatient portal sessionsStandard Deviation 31
Low Tech, High TouchInpatient Portal Use Frequency21 Inpatient portal sessionsStandard Deviation 18
High Tech, Low TouchInpatient Portal Use Frequency29 Inpatient portal sessionsStandard Deviation 36
Low Tech, Low TouchInpatient Portal Use Frequency20 Inpatient portal sessionsStandard Deviation 26
Primary

Patient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management Questions

Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: If you had a question about your care while you were in the hospital, what steps did you take to find an answer? (mark all that apply).

Time frame: 15 days after discharge.

Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked my doctor167 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked a nurse217 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked hospital staff58 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI searched online70 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsOther16 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI did not have questions8 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI did not have questions1 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI searched online21 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked my doctor66 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked hospital staff26 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked a nurse76 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsOther5 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked a nurse94 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked hospital staff30 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI searched online39 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI did not have questions3 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsOther7 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked my doctor82 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsOther1 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI did not have questions1 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked a nurse29 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI searched online9 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked my doctor26 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Finding Answers to Health Management QuestionsI asked hospital staff10 Patients
Primary

Patient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management

Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: All of my questions about managing my health, including my medications, were addressed before I left the hospital.. Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.

Time frame: 15 days after discharge.

Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management112 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management37 Participants with positive response
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management118 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Questions About Health Management37 Participants with positive response
Primary

Patient Involvement With Care - Tablet's Activities

Questions from the involvement with care domain of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient involvement with their care. Answers to the following multiple-choice survey item were explored: What kind of activities did you use the table for? (mark all that apply).

Time frame: 15 days after discharge.

Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesMyChart Bedside217 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesSocial media41 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesNone of the above8 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesResearch health issues114 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesWatch movies/TV20 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesEmail33 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesCommunicate with family20 Patients
High Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesPlay games65 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesResearch health issues34 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesSocial media9 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesWatch movies/TV6 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesPlay games27 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesMyChart Bedside73 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesCommunicate with family5 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesNone of the above6 Patients
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesEmail9 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesPlay games31 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesResearch health issues52 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesSocial media22 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesCommunicate with family9 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesEmail14 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesMyChart Bedside93 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesWatch movies/TV7 Patients
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesNone of the above5 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesNone of the above3 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesEmail5 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesSocial media9 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesWatch movies/TV3 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesCommunicate with family3 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesPlay games14 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesMyChart Bedside26 Patients
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Involvement With Care - Tablet's ActivitiesResearch health issues15 Patients
Primary

Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals

Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 6-month Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with the interactions you had with your healthcare professionals? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.

Time frame: 6 months after discharge

Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals153 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals63 Participants with positive response
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals127 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals33 Participants with positive response
Primary

Patient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals

Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with the interactions you had with your healthcare professionals? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.

Time frame: 15 days after discharge

Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals150 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals50 Participants with positive response
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals59 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Interactions With Healthcare Professionals22 Participants with positive response
Primary

Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals

Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 6-month Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In the past 6 months, how satisfied were you with how well your healthcare professionals responded to your concerns? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.

Time frame: 6 months after discharge

Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals139 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals59 Participants with positive response
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals117 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals24 Participants with positive response
Primary

Patient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals

Questions from the satisfaction and experience domains of the 15-day Post-discharge surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction with their care. Answers to the following 5-point Likert scale survey item were explored: In your most recent hospital experience, how satisfied were you with how well your healthcare professionals responded to your concerns? . Responses were dichotomized to one most positive response versus all other responses.

Time frame: 15 days after discharge

Population: Patients who responded to the selected survey item.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals142 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, High TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals49 Participants with positive response
High Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals59 Participants with positive response
Low Tech, Low TouchPatient Satisfaction With Care - Responses From Healthcare Professionals23 Participants with positive response
Secondary

Outpatient Portal Adoption

MyChart (outpatient portal) accounts activated by participants after their enrollment in the study (based on log file analysis).

Time frame: 3 months post-discharge

Population: Participants without an active outpatient portal account at the time of their enrollment in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Tech, High TouchOutpatient Portal Adoption218 Participants
Low Tech, High TouchOutpatient Portal Adoption66 Participants
High Tech, Low TouchOutpatient Portal Adoption126 Participants
Low Tech, Low TouchOutpatient Portal Adoption29 Participants
Secondary

Outpatient Portal Frequency of Use

Count of MyChart (outpatient portal) sessions (based on log file analysis).

Time frame: 3 months post-discharge

Population: Patients with an active outpatient portal account; either predating their participation in the study (Previous users) or activated after study enrollment (New users).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Tech, High TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UseNew users21 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 32
High Tech, High TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UsePrevious users35 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 41
Low Tech, High TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UsePrevious users41 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 44
Low Tech, High TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UseNew users19 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 21
High Tech, Low TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UseNew users17 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 25
High Tech, Low TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UsePrevious users38 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 48
Low Tech, Low TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UseNew users20 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 29
Low Tech, Low TouchOutpatient Portal Frequency of UsePrevious users37 Outpatient portal sessionsStandard Error 38
Secondary

Self-Efficacy

5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Patients who completed the self-efficacy section of the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Tech, High TouchSelf-Efficacy4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Low Tech, High TouchSelf-Efficacy4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
High Tech, Low TouchSelf-Efficacy4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Low Tech, Low TouchSelf-Efficacy4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Self-Efficacy

5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes.

Time frame: 15 days post-discharge

Population: Patients who completed the self-efficacy section of the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Tech, High TouchSelf-Efficacy4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Low Tech, High TouchSelf-Efficacy4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
High Tech, Low TouchSelf-Efficacy4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Low Tech, Low TouchSelf-Efficacy4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Self-Efficacy

5-point Likert scale built on the participant responses to 6 self-efficacy-related items from the admission survey. Self-efficacy measures the belief in one's capacity to complete a task, rather than the relevant skills possessed. Scale developed on the basis of Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337. Self-Efficacy scale: * min value: 1; * max value: 5; * higher scores are better outcomes.

Time frame: 6 months post-discharge

Population: Patients who completed the self-efficacy section of the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Tech, High TouchSelf-Efficacy4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Low Tech, High TouchSelf-Efficacy4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
High Tech, Low TouchSelf-Efficacy4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Low Tech, Low TouchSelf-Efficacy4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026