Skip to content

Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction

Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02942927
Acronym
TAPER-RCT
Enrollment
345
Registered
2016-10-24
Start date
2018-06-04
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medication Therapy Management, Multi-morbidity, Polypharmacy

Keywords

Polypharmacy, Multimorbidity, Randomized Control Trial, Drug Discontinuation, Patient Preference, eHealth

Brief summary

In an aging population, most seniors suffer from multiple chronic conditions. When the number of medications taken is ≥5 (polypharmacy), the burden of taking multiple concurrent medications can do more harm than good. Seniors take an average of 7 regular medications and studies link polypharmacy with adverse effects on morbidity, function and health service use. However, it is not clear to what extent these are reversible if medication burden is reduced. This trial will test the effects on medication numbers and patient health outcomes of an intervention to polypharmacy. This study will test a program focused on medication reduction number and dose. Prioritizing medications according to the patient's preference as reducing the dose also reduces the risk of drug side effects. Patients, aged 70 years of age or older and are taking ≥5 medications, will randomly receive the program immediately or at 6 months. The program involves information gathering from the patient, including systematically seeking patients priorities and preferences medication review with the pharmacist and then a consultation with the family doctor. The intervention is focused on discontinuing/reducing the dose of medications where possible using a 'pause and monitor' framework to assess the need for restart. An electronic program that detects drug adverse effects and flags potentially inappropriate medications will be integrated into an electronic clinical pathway incorporating monitoring and follow up systems. This study will examine effects on patient and health relevant outcome measures as well as qualitative research exploring patients' and clinicians' experiences of reducing medication burden. The results will be used to determine whether this system can be implemented as part of routine preventative care in primary care for older adults.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive the intervention at study start or delayed appointment 6 months later. Initial baseline data collection from the patient include data on demographics, medications, and illness characteristics. The patient will then attend an appointment with a pharmacist to review medications appropriate for discontinuation/dose reduction, after which the patient will meet with their family physician to discuss patient preferences for discontinuation/dose reduction. Both health care providers will have access to TaperMD, a web based program linked to evidence and tools to support reduction in polypharmacy. Follow-up research assessments will take place at one week, 3 months and 6 months (study end). Outcome assessments and a semi-structured interview will take place at the 6 month appointment.

Interventions

Systematic approach to reduction in polypharmacy.

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
David Braley and Nancy Gordon Chair in Family Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
RxISK
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

PI and Data analyst were blinded to allocation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 70 years of age or older * Patient must have a family doctor * Participating family doctor as most responsible provider * Currently taking more 5 or more long-term medications * Have not had a recent (past 12 months) comprehensive medication review * Patient willing to try discontinuation

Exclusion criteria

* English language or cognitive skills inadequate to understand and respond to rating scales * Terminal illness or other circumstance precluding 6 month study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful discontinuation (mean difference in number of medications)Baseline, 6 monthsDifference in mean number of medications

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life (SF36v2)Baseline, 6 monthsThe Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36-V2)
CognitionBaseline, 6 monthsThe Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
FatigueBaseline, 6 monthsAvlund Mob-T Scale
Patient experience of painBaseline, 6 monthsBrief Pain Inventory (Pain interference and Pain severity sub-scales)
Patient enablementBaseline, 6 monthsThe Patient Enablement Index (PEI)
SleepBaseline, 6 months15-D Scale (Sleep Question)
Disease burdenBaseline, 6 monthsDisease Burden Survey (Bayliss et al., 2009)
Nutritional statusBaseline, 6 monthsMini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF)
Treatment burdenBaseline, 6 monthsBrief Treatment Burden Scale
FallsBaseline, 6 monthsTotal number of falls resulting in medication consultation or treatment recorded in hospital admission and primary care records, and by patient
Physical functional capacity and abilityBaseline, 6 monthsManty structured validated interview
Physical function capacity and ability (timed-up-and-go)Baseline, 6 monthsTimed up and go test (TUG)
Physical function capacity and ability (strength)Baseline, 6 monthGrip strength
Physical function capacity and ability (balance)Baseline, 6 monthsGlobal Rating of Change (Balance)
Healthcare resource utilization (hospital admissions)Baseline, 6 monthsNumber of hospital admissions from administrative data and self-report; proportion of patients with at least one hospitalization
Healthcare resource utilization (ED/urgent care visits)Baseline, 6 monthsNumber of emergency department and urgent care visits from administrative data and self-report
Quality of life (EQ5D-5L)Baseline, 6 monthsEuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D-5L)
Successful discontinuation or dose reduction6 monthsComposite variable calculate to represent mean number of medications stopped or dose reductions
Successful discontinuation or dose reduction (proportion)6 monthsProportion of patients with successful discontinuations or dose reductions
Changes in medication side effects and symptoms (adverse)1 week, 3 month, 6 monthPatient self-report of appearance (new or worsening) of side effects associated with medications
Changes in medication side effects and symptoms (positive)1 week, 3 month, 6 monthPatient self-report of disappearance (improvement or disappearance) of side effects associated with medications
Serious adverse events3 months, 6 monthsAny event that requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, causes congenital malformation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is life-threatening or results in death (Health Canada (2011) Guidance Document for Industry - Reporting Adverse Reactions to Marketed Health Products)
Medication self-efficacyBaseline, 6 monthsSelf-efficacy for appropriate mediation use scale
Healthcare resource utilization (primary care visits)baseline, 6 monthsNumber of primary care visits from administrative data

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacists/family physician 5 best/worst aspects of intervention6 monthsOpen ended list
Pharmacists/family physician confidence in medication discontinuationBaseline, 6 months5 point Likert scale single question developed for study
Pharmacists/family physician experiences with the deprescribing process6 monthsSemi-structured interviews; field notes
Strengths and weaknesses of intervention6 monthsOpen ended questions
Patient experience with deprescribing process (diary)6 monthsPatient diaries
Patient experience with deprescribing process (interview)6 monthsSemi-structured interview
Satisfaction with intervention6 months5 point Likert scale single question developed for study
Satisfaction with care around medicationsBaseline, 6 months5 point Likert scale single question developed for study
Cost effectiveness6 monthsIncremental cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (payer perspective)
Implementation processesbaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsNoMAD survey

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026