Skip to content

Cetuximab Maintenance Treatment Versus Continuation After Induction Therapy in mCRC

Biomarker-Panel Guided Maintenance Treatment With Cetuximab Monotherapy Versus Continuation After First Line Induction Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) : a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02942706
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-10-24
Start date
2021-11-30
Completion date
2022-10-31
Last updated
2021-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

This study is try to evaluate the effect of cetuximab monotherapy as maintenance treatment, versus continuation after 8 courses of induction therapy with cetuximab plus standard chemotherapy regimen (FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6)in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The maintenance treatments are continued until disease progression or untolerated toxicity. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that cetuximab monotherapy is non-inferior to continuation treatment, in those mCRC patients who responded to induction therapy(SD, PR, or CR), and carry biomarker-panels (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA) favor EGFR antibody.

Detailed description

This study is try to evaluate the effect of cetuximab monotherapy as maintenance treatment, versus continuation after 8 courses of induction therapy with cetuximab plus standard chemotherapy regimen (FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6)in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The maintenance treatments are continued until disease progression or untolerated toxicity. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that cetuximab monotherapy is non-inferior to continuation treatment, in those mCRC patients who responded to induction therapy(SD, PR, or CR), and carry biomarker-panels (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA) favor EGFR antibody. Furthermore, the mutation status of biomarker panel consist of KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, PIK3CA, PTEN, SMAD4, SMAD2, TGFBR2, cMET, Src, mTOR, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, EPHA2, MSI, TP53, ERCC1, ERCC5, KCNQ5, ILK, and Myc will be analyzed by NGS sequencing. The ctDNA as surrogate marker via liquid biopsy will be conducted before randomization, during maintenance treatment, and disease progression.

Interventions

DRUGCetuximab

anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody

DRUGmFOLFOX6

Oxaliplatin+LV5FU2

DRUGFOLFIRI

Irinotecan+LV5FU2

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
West China Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Before the start of induction therapy: Inclusion Criteria: * Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained); * Distant metastases which are either technically unresectable or no chance to reach NED (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible); * Measurable disease (\> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or \> 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation; * Ongoing or planned first line induction therapy with 8 cycles of FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment * Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases * Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease * RAS mutant mCRC At randomisation: Inclusion criteria: * WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky PS \> 70%); * Disease evaluation with proven SD, PR or CR according to RECIST after 8 cycles of FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6; * Laboratory values obtained ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomisation: adequate bone marrow function (Hb \> 8.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count \> 1.5 x 109/L, platelets \> 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, \> 30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤ 3 x ULN without presence of liver metastases or ≤ 5x ULN with presence of liver metastases); * Life expectancy \> 24 weeks; * Age: 18-75 years; * Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential; * Expected adequacy of follow-up; * Institutional Review Board approval; * Written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival 1 (PFS1)4 monthsfrom randomization to progression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival 2 (PFS2)10 monthsfrom signing informed consent to progression
Overall Survival (OS)24 monthsfrom signing informed consent to death
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.024 monthsdrug related toxicity from signing informed consent to death
Quality of life (QoL)24 monthsQoL from signing informed consent to death

Contacts

Primary ContactJun Zhang, MD & Ph. D
junzhang10977@sjtu.edu.cn+86-13818332497
Backup ContactMin Shi, MD & Ph. D
shimin0412005@126.com+86-13512118830

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026