Clinical Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance for E-max Cad and Vita Suprinity Laminate Veneers

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02940717

Enrollment

Registered

2016-10-21

Start date

2017-01-31

Completion date

2018-03-31

Last updated

2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Discoloration

Brief summary

Patients need laminate veneer for their teeth usually use Emax CAD as an etchable ceramic. Yet fracture may occur so a stronger material is needed. Vita Suprinity is a recent material with glass ceramic enriched with zirconia (approx. 10% by weight) that offer practices and laboratories a high-strength, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS) and can be used to fabricate laminate veneers but the investigators have to know clinically it is fracture resistance, so the investigators are going to have Parallel groups in a randomized clinical trial.

Interventions

OTHERVita suprinity

New glass ceramic material

OTHEREmax CAD

standard etchable glass ceramic used for laminate venneers

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

All subjects are required to be: * From 18-60 years old, and able to read and sign the informed consent document. * Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures * Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations * Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer (e.g. discoloration, fracture not involve more than 50% enamel loss, mild malposition, ….) * Willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth * Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss * Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation * Pregnant women * Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations * Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Fracture resistance assessed by clinical evaluation using dental mirror and probe according to the modified united states public health criteria	1 Year	clinical evaluation of Fracture resistance

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Patient satisfaction assessed using a Questionnaire	1 Year	Questionnaire for patient satisfaction

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026