Skip to content

Comparing Bioavailability When Preservative-free Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL) is Administered as an Intramuscular Manual Injection or as a Subcutaneous Injection Using an Auto-injector in Healthy Post-menopausal Women

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Bioavailability When Preservative-free Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL) is Administered as an Intramuscular Manual Injection or as a Subcutaneous Injection Using an Auto-injector in Healthy Post-menopausal Women

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02940522
Enrollment
122
Registered
2016-10-21
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2022-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Comparing Bioavailability When Makena® is Administered in Healthy Post-menopausal Women

Brief summary

To demonstrate that a single dose of Makena® delivered SQ via auto-injector has comparable bioavailability to a single IM injection of Makena®.

Interventions

Sponsors

AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1\. Naturally or surgically postmenopausal women, with or without an intact uterus, aged 50 to 75 years of age, inclusive. FSH levels greater than 40 mIU/mL

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently taking any estrogen/progesterone hormone replacement therapy (HRT). 2. History of allergy or sensitivity to hydroxyprogesterone caproate, castor oil or any of the constituents of the study medications, or history of any drug hypersensitivity or intolerance 3. Poorly controlled diabetes. 4. History or current evidence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or arterial thromboembolic disease (e.g., stroke, myocardial infarction). 5. Known, suspected, or current history of carcinoma of the breast. 6. Subjects with a past history of breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors or selective estrogen receptor modulators. 7. Known, suspected, or current history of hormone dependent tumor within the last 5 years. 8. Any current or recent (within previous 12 months) genital bleeding of unknown etiology. 9. Receipt of any investigational drug within 30 days. 10. Receipt of any prescription or OTC medications that are known to alter CYP3A4 or CYP3A5 levels (e.g., carbamazepine, St. John's Wort, ketoconazole, rifampin, ritonavir, alprazolam, azithromycin, loratadine, etc.) within 14. 11. Any estrogen, progestin, or selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) treatment within specified time windows before the study start, ranging from 2 to 6 months. 12. High blood pressure at the screening evaluation, defined as systolic blood pressure \> 150 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mm Hg. 13. History of excessive alcohol consumption (on average more than 14 units of alcohol/week) during the past 12 months. 14. Use of tobacco products within 30 days of the start of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Areas Under the Curve (AUC) to the Last Time With a Concentration ≥ LLOQ [AUC0-t] and to Infinity [AUCinf]9 weeksComparison of areas under the curve (AUC) to the last time with a concentration ≥ LLOQ \[AUC0-t\] and to infinity \[AUCinf\] for the Primary PK Population
Comparison of the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)9 weeksComparison of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for the Primary PK Population

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Tmax9 weeksComparison of PK parameter Tmax for the Primary PK population
Comparison of AUC (0-168)9 weeksComparison of PK Parameter AUC (0-168) for the Primary PK Population
Comparison of t1/29 weeksComparison of PK parameter t1/2 for the Primary PK Population
Comparison of Elimination Rate Constant9 weeksComparison of the elimination rate constant for the Primary PK Population

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment A
Subcutaneous (SQ) injection using an autoinjector Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL)
59
Treatment B
Intramuscular injection (IM) using syringe and needle Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL)
61
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment BTreatment ATotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants12 Participants20 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
53 Participants47 Participants100 Participants
Age, Continuous57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.68
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.16
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.05
Region of Enrollment
United States
61 participants59 participants120 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants59 Participants120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 5923 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 590 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Areas Under the Curve (AUC) to the Last Time With a Concentration ≥ LLOQ [AUC0-t] and to Infinity [AUCinf]

Comparison of areas under the curve (AUC) to the last time with a concentration ≥ LLOQ \[AUC0-t\] and to infinity \[AUCinf\] for the Primary PK Population

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The Primary PK Population consisted of 45 subjects each for both treatments for whom whole blood was analyzed. Subjects were excluded from Treatment A and Treatment B due to insufficient number of samples for planned analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment AComparison of Areas Under the Curve (AUC) to the Last Time With a Concentration ≥ LLOQ [AUC0-t] and to Infinity [AUCinf]AUC(0-t)2,313 hr x ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.5
Treatment AComparison of Areas Under the Curve (AUC) to the Last Time With a Concentration ≥ LLOQ [AUC0-t] and to Infinity [AUCinf]AUC(inf)2,469 hr x ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.8
Treatment BComparison of Areas Under the Curve (AUC) to the Last Time With a Concentration ≥ LLOQ [AUC0-t] and to Infinity [AUCinf]AUC(0-t)2,098 hr x ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.7
Treatment BComparison of Areas Under the Curve (AUC) to the Last Time With a Concentration ≥ LLOQ [AUC0-t] and to Infinity [AUCinf]AUC(inf)2,175 hr x ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.8
Primary

Comparison of the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Comparison of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for the Primary PK Population

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The Primary PK Population consisted of 45 subjects each for both treatments for whom whole blood was analyzed. Subjects were excluded from Treatment A and Treatment B due to insufficient number of samples for planned analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment AComparison of the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)7.88 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.9
Treatment BComparison of the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)6.91 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62.9
Secondary

Comparison of AUC (0-168)

Comparison of PK Parameter AUC (0-168) for the Primary PK Population

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The Primary PK Population consisted of 45 subjects each for both treatments for whom whole blood was analyzed. Subjects were excluded from Treatment A and Treatment B due to insufficient number of samples for planned analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment AComparison of AUC (0-168)813 hr x ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.5
Treatment BComparison of AUC (0-168)790 hr x ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.5
Secondary

Comparison of Elimination Rate Constant

Comparison of the elimination rate constant for the Primary PK Population

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The Primary PK Population consisted of 45 subjects each for both treatments for whom whole blood was analyzed. Subjects were excluded from Treatment A and Treatment B due to insufficient number of samples for planned analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment AComparison of Elimination Rate Constant0.0033 1/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.1
Treatment BComparison of Elimination Rate Constant0.0038 1/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.5
Secondary

Comparison of t1/2

Comparison of PK parameter t1/2 for the Primary PK Population

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The Primary PK Population consisted of 45 subjects each for both treatments for whom whole blood was analyzed. Subjects were excluded from Treatment A and Treatment B due to insufficient number of samples for planned analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment AComparison of t1/2212 hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.1
Treatment BComparison of t1/2185 hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.5
Secondary

Comparison of Tmax

Comparison of PK parameter Tmax for the Primary PK population

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The Primary PK Population consisted of 45 subjects each for both treatments for whom whole blood was analyzed. Subjects were excluded from Treatment A and Treatment B due to insufficient number of samples for planned analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Treatment AComparison of Tmax48.1 hr
Treatment BComparison of Tmax49.7 hr

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026