Cancer, Stress, Psychological
Conditions
Keywords
Stress management, App
Brief summary
The purpose with this study is to test the effect of an app for stress management among patients with a variety of cancer diagnoses.
Detailed description
A cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatment can be disruptive and traumatic, often accompanied by a multitude of stressors for the patients and their support network. Uncertainty of outcome and invasive medical procedures with aversive side effects are not uncommon, and while people differ widely in how they experience and cope with such challenges, cancer related distress including anxiety, depression, worry and rumination is prevalent. With multiple domains of function impacted it is also not surprising that quality of life (QoL) often is diminished. Stress management interventions can facilitate adjustment to cancer, including reduced distress and improved quality of life. Unfortunately, many people with cancer do not have the strength or opportunity to attend groups or in-person interventions. This study will therefore test the effect of an app for stress management among patients with different cancer diagnosis. The app contains 10 modules distributed over five weeks, focusing on education of different techniques for reduction of stress and stress reduction exercises. The app was tested in a feasibility pilot study among 25 patients with a variety of cancer diagnoses and is now being tested in a randomized controlled trial with a sample of 175 cancer survivors. The participants were randomly assigned to use the 10 module app or to a control group that receive treatment as usual, and will be followed with repeated measures over 12 months.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALApp for stress management
An app consisting of 10 modules that teaches stress management, cognitive behavioral coping skills and relaxation training.
Sponsors
Norwegian Cancer Society
Oslo University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients diagnosed with cancer (all diagnosis). * Maximum time since completed treatment at hospital: 12 months * Patients are \> 18 years of age, able to write/read/speak Norwegian and have their own smart phone or tablet
Exclusion criteria
• None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) | Baseline, post intervention follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months | 14 item scale measuring perceived stress. Scale range: 0-56. Higher scores indicate higher perceived stress. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Self-Regulatory Fatigue-18 (SRF-18) | Baseline, post intervention follow up at 3 and 12 months | 18 item scale measuring self-regulation. Scale range: 18 to 90. A higher score indicates higher self regulatory fatigue |
| The Brief Coping Orientation to Problems (Brief COPE) | Baseline | The outcome measure consists of 14 different scales of different coping strategies with two items per scale, for a total of 28 items. Scale range 2 to 8. Higher scores indicate higer use of the different coping strategies |
| Health, well-being and sleep | Baseline, post intervention follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months | A 5 item measure, measuring health, well-being and sleep on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate better health, well-being and sleep |
| SF-36 Item Short Form Health Survey (RAND-36 version) | Baseline, post intervention follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months | 36 item scale measuring health related quality of life (HRQoL). The scale has 8 subscales and 1 single item score. Scale and single item range: 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher HRQoL. |
| The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Baseline, post intervention follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months | 14 item scale measuring anxiety and depression. The Scale has a total score with a scale range of 0 to 42 and an anxiety (HADS-A) and a depression (HADS-D) subscale, both with scale range of 0 to 21. Higer scores indicate higher level of anxiety and depression |
| The Distress Thermometer | Baseline, post intervention follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months | One item scale measuring distress on a scale from 0 to 10. Higer scores indicate higher distress |
| Intervention commentary | Post intervention (immediately post intervention) | A six item brief measure of participant's intervention reactions. The first 3 items gauged participants' program perception on a scale from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating better perception. The next 3 items were open ended questions: \* What did you like best? \* What did you like the least? \* Suggestions for improvement? |
Countries
Norway
Outcome results
None listed