Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Turoctocog Alfa for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Bleeding Episodes in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Haemophilia A

Efficacy and Safety of Turoctocog Alfa for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Bleeding Episodes in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Haemophilia A

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02938585
Acronym
guardian TM 7
Enrollment
68
Registered
2016-10-19
Start date
2016-12-12
Completion date
2018-12-12
Last updated
2020-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Bleeding Disorder, Haemophilia A

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in China. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of turoctocog alfa in treatment of bleeding episodes in Chinese patients with severe haemophilia A (FVIII≤1%).

Interventions

The preventative treatment is administered intravenously (i.v.) at specific intervals either every second day or three times a week. Bleeding treatment will be administered if a bleed should occur.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male patients * Age from 0 years * With the diagnosis of severe congenital haemophilia A (FVIII≤1%) * History of exposure days (ED) to any FVIII products fulfilling the criteria of previously treated patients: * Patients of 12 years or above: 100 exposures days (ED) or more * Patients below 12 years: 50 exposure days (ED) or more

Exclusion criteria

* Inhibitors to factor VIII (≥0.6 BU) at screening as assessed by central laboratory * Known history of FVIII inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsMonth 0-6The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for treatment of bleeding episodes in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response, excellent, good, moderate and none.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 6 MonthsMonth 0-6This endpoint presented 'percentage of participants with inhibitory antibodies against FVIII (≥0.6 BU)' in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen, evaluated during month 0-6.
Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 24 MonthsMonth 0-24This endpoint presented 'percentage of participants with inhibitory antibodies against FVIII (≥0.6 BU)' in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen, evaluated during month 0-24.
Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 6 MonthsMonth 0-6Number of bleeds (total bleeds assessed as annual bleeding rate) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6. The annualised bleeding rate was analysed by a negative binomial model.
Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 24 MonthsMonth 0-24Number of bleeds (total bleeds assessed as annual bleeding rate) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24. The annualised bleeding rate was analysed by a negative binomial model.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (6 Months)Month 0-6Average dose of turoctocog alfa used to treat a bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (24 Months)Month 0-24Average dose of turoctocog alfa used to treat a bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (6 Months)Month 0-6Number of turoctocog alfa injections consumed to treat a bleeding episode in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (24 Months)Month 0-24Number of turoctocog alfa injections consumed to treat a bleeding episode in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (6 Months)Month 0-6Consumption of turoctocog alfa IU/kg BW per bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (24 Months)Month 0-24Consumption of turoctocog alfa IU/kg BW per bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (6 Months)Month 0-6Average preventive dose of turoctocog alfa consumed per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (24 Months)Month 0-24Average preventive dose of turoctocog alfa consumed per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)Month 0-6Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight (BW) per month) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)Month 0-24Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight (BW) per month) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)Month 0-6Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per year) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)Month 0-24Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight (BW) per year) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)Month 0-6Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per month) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)Month 0-24Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per month) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)Month 0-6Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per year) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.
Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)Month 0-24Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per year) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.
Frequency of Adverse Events (6 Months)Month 0-6Frequency of adverse events (AEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of AEs per patient years. All presented AEs are treatment emergent (TEAEs), which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Frequency of Adverse Events (24 Months)Month 0-24Frequency of adverse events (AEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of AEs per patient years. All presented AEs are treatment emergent (TEAEs), which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (6 Months)Month 0-6Frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of SAEs per patient years. All presented SAEs are treatment emergent, which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (24 Months)Month 0-24Frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of SAEs per patient years. All presented SAEs are treatment emergent, which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsMonth 0-6The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for surgery was evaluated during month 0-6. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response (excellent, good, moderate and none) and assessed by the investigator/surgeon on the day of surgery (day 1) and on the last day in the post-operative period the participant was at the trial/surgery site.
Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsMonth 0-24The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for surgery was evaluated during month 0-24. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response (excellent, good, moderate and none) and assessed by the investigator/surgeon on the day of surgery (day 1) and on the last day in the post-operative period the participant was at the trial/surgery site. Haemostatic response of 'not applicable' indicated that turoctocog alfa was not used.
Loss of Blood (Surgery): 6 MonthsMonth 0-6Loss of blood was evaluated during month 0-6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.
Loss of Blood (Surgery): 24 MonthsMonth 0-24Loss of blood was evaluated during month 0-24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.
Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 6 MonthsMonth 0-6Surgeries required transfusion was evaluated during month 0-6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.
Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 24 MonthsMonth 0-24Surgeries required transfusion was evaluated during month 0-24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.
Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 MonthsMonth 0-6TEAEs during surgery were recorded during month 0-6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. TEAEs were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 MonthsMonth 0-24TEAEs during surgery were recorded during month 0-24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. TEAEs were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 MonthsMonth 0-6Treatment emergent serious adverse events occurred during surgery were recorded from month 0 to month 6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant is at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. Treatment emergent events were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 MonthsMonth 0-24Treatment emergent serious adverse events occurred during surgery were recorded from month 0 to month 24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant is at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. Treatment emergent events were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.
Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6Month 0, Month 6Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 6) of end of disease and age specific HRQOL. HRQOL was collected through use of the patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments, HAEMO-QOL (for children (8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)) and HAEM-A-QOL (for adults (\>=17 years)). HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. HAEM-A-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports and leisure, work and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, family planning, and partnership and sexuality. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEMO-QOL and HAEM-A-QOL, respectively are presented.
Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24Month 0, Month 24Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 24) of end of disease and age specific HRQOL. HRQOL was collected through use of the patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments, HAEM-A-QOL (for adults (\>=17 years)) and HAEMO-QOL (for children (8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)). HAEM-A-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports and leisure, work and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, family planning, and partnership and sexuality. HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEM-A-QOL and HAEMO-QOL, respectively are presented.
Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6Month 0, Month 6Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 6) of end of disease and age specific health related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was collected through use of the PRO instrument, HAEMO-QOL (for parents of the children (4-7 years and 8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)). HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of himself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, nursery School or Kindergarten, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEMO-QOL are presented.
Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24Month 0, Month 24Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 24) of end of disease and age specific health related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was collected through use of the PRO instrument, HAEMO-QOL (for parents of the children (4-7 years and 8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)). HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of himself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, nursery School or Kindergarten, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEMO-QOL are presented.
Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsMonth 0-24The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for treatment of bleeding episodes in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response, excellent, good, moderate and none.
Area Under the Curve (AUC0-inf)Days 1-2Blood samples for the evaluation of AUC0-inf were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. AUC0-inf was defined as the area under the concentration versus time from time curve zero to infinity. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.
Half-life (t½)Days 1-2Blood samples for the evaluation of t½ were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.
Clearance (CL)Days 1-2Blood samples for the evaluation of CL were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.
Highest Measured FVIII Activity in the Profile (Cmax)Days 1-2Blood samples for the evaluation of Cmax were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.
Incremental Recovery of FVIIIDays 1-2Blood samples for the evaluation of incremental recovery of FVIII were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The incremental recovery was calculated as (FVIII: coagulant (C) activity measured in plasma 30 minutes after dosing - FVIII:C activity measured in plasma immediately before dosing)/(dose injected at time 0 minute), where the dose was expressed as IU FVIII product per kg body weight. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 10 sites in mainland China.

Pre-assignment details

Study design: This was an open-label and non-randomised trial. Participants with severe haemophilia A were administered a prophylaxis (preventive) or on-demand regimen of turoctocog alfa (trial product) at the investigator's discretion.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)
Participants were to receive turoctocog alfa intravenous (i.v.) injections for at least 6 months (main phase) as either prophylaxis or on-demand treatment at investigator's discretion. The recommended prophylaxis starting dose was 30 IU/kg. Prophylaxis doses ranged from 25-50 IU/kg (once every-second-day), or 25-60 IU/kg (3-times-weekly). Bleeds were treated with one or more turoctocog alfa i.v. bolus injections as determined by the investigator and based on the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH) guidance. Participants who underwent surgery were treated with turoctocog alfa according to WFH guidance and their coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) activity levels were to be maintained as per the following guidance: Minor surgery: 30-60 IU/dL. Major surgery: 80-100 IU/dL pre- and postoperatively.
9
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)
Participants were to receive turoctocog alfa i.v. injections for at least 6 months (main phase) as either prophylaxis or on-demand treatment at investigator's discretion. The recommended prophylaxis starting dose was 30 IU/kg. Prophylaxis doses ranged from 25-50 IU/kg (once every-second-day), or 25-60 IU/kg (3-times-weekly). Bleeds were treated with one or more turoctocog alfa i.v. bolus injections as determined by investigator and based on the WFH guidance. Participants who underwent surgery were treated with turoctocog alfa according to WFH guidance, and their FVIII activity levels were to be maintained as per the following guidance: Minor surgery: 30-60 IU/dL. Major surgery: 80-100 IU/dL pre- and postoperatively.
33
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)
Participants were to receive turoctocog alfa i.v. injections for at least 6 months (main phase) as either prophylaxis or on-demand treatment at investigator's discretion. The recommended prophylaxis starting dose was 25 IU/kg. Prophylaxis doses ranged from 20-40 IU/kg (once every-second-day), or 20-50 IU/kg (3-times-weekly). Bleeds were treated with one or more turoctocog alfa i.v. bolus injections as determined by the investigator and based on the WFH guidance. Participants who underwent surgery were treated with turoctocog alfa according to WFH guidance and their FVIII activity levels were to be maintained as per the following guidance: Minor surgery: 30-60 IU/dL. Major surgery: 80-100 IU/dL pre- and postoperatively.
11
Adults (>=18 Years)
Participants were to receive turoctocog alfa i.v. injections for at least 6 months (main phase) as either prophylaxis or on-demand treatment at investigator's discretion. Participants who completed 6 months of treatment (prophylaxis or on-demand) in the main phase, were to continue the same treatment for up to approximately 18 months (extension phase). Participants were allowed to switch between treatments in the 'extension phase'. The recommended prophylaxis starting dose was 25 IU/kg. Prophylaxis doses ranged from 20-40 IU/kg (once every-second-day), or 20-50 IU/kg (3-times-weekly). Bleeds were treated with one or more turoctocog alfa i.v. bolus injections as determined by the investigator and based on the WFH guidance. Participants who underwent surgery were treated with turoctocog alfa according to WFH guidance and their FVIII activity levels were to be maintained as per the following guidance: Minor surgery: 30-60 IU/dL. Major surgery: 80-100 IU/dL pre- and postoperatively.
15
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyWithdrawal by parent or guardian0100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0005

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSmall Children (0 to <6 Years)Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Adults (>=18 Years)Total
Age, Continuous4.00 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12
8.70 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.91
14.55 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.92
31.00 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
13.94 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.99
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants33 Participants11 Participants15 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
9 Participants33 Participants11 Participants15 Participants68 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants33 Participants11 Participants15 Participants68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 330 / 110 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 918 / 337 / 1110 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 90 / 332 / 110 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 Months

The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for treatment of bleeding episodes in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response, excellent, good, moderate and none.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsGood12 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsMissing0 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsModerate1 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsExcellent35 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsModerate15 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsMissing1 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsGood73 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsExcellent156 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsModerate0 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsExcellent20 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsGood8 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsMissing0 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsGood87 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsExcellent190 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsModerate13 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 6 MonthsMissing0 Bleeding episodes
Secondary

Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 Months

TEAEs during surgery were recorded during month 0-24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. TEAEs were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 Months4 Events
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 Months1 Events
Secondary

Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 Months

TEAEs during surgery were recorded during month 0-6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. TEAEs were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 Months1 Events
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 Months1 Events
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC0-inf)

Blood samples for the evaluation of AUC0-inf were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. AUC0-inf was defined as the area under the concentration versus time from time curve zero to infinity. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.

Time frame: Days 1-2

Population: Full analysis set excluding outliers. The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Exceptional outlier PK profiles and/or individual plasma concentrations were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Area Under the Curve (AUC0-inf)16.4 IU*h/mLStandard Deviation 3.5
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Area Under the Curve (AUC0-inf)17.7 IU*h/mLStandard Deviation 7.3
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Area Under the Curve (AUC0-inf)11.2 IU*h/mLStandard Deviation 4.7
Adults (>=18 Years)Area Under the Curve (AUC0-inf)16.9 IU*h/mLStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24

Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 24) of end of disease and age specific health related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was collected through use of the PRO instrument, HAEMO-QOL (for parents of the children (4-7 years and 8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)). HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of himself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, nursery School or Kindergarten, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEMO-QOL are presented.

Time frame: Month 0, Month 24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24Baseline45.7 ScoresStandard Deviation 15.2
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24Change from baseline-6.7 ScoresStandard Deviation 11.5
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24Baseline48.3 ScoresStandard Deviation 14.1
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24Change from baseline-11.3 ScoresStandard Deviation 10.7
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24Baseline40.8 ScoresStandard Deviation 11.7
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 24Change from baseline-3.1 ScoresStandard Deviation 3.9
Secondary

Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6

Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 6) of end of disease and age specific health related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was collected through use of the PRO instrument, HAEMO-QOL (for parents of the children (4-7 years and 8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)). HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of himself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, nursery School or Kindergarten, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEMO-QOL are presented.

Time frame: Month 0, Month 6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6Baseline45.7 ScoresStandard Deviation 15.2
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6Change from baseline-6.2 ScoresStandard Deviation 7.7
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6Baseline48.3 ScoresStandard Deviation 14.1
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6Change from baseline-9.9 ScoresStandard Deviation 8.7
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6Baseline40.8 ScoresStandard Deviation 11.7
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Parents): Month 6Change from baseline-1.5 ScoresStandard Deviation 7.2
Secondary

Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24

Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 24) of end of disease and age specific HRQOL. HRQOL was collected through use of the patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments, HAEM-A-QOL (for adults (\>=17 years)) and HAEMO-QOL (for children (8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)). HAEM-A-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports and leisure, work and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, family planning, and partnership and sexuality. HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEM-A-QOL and HAEMO-QOL, respectively are presented.

Time frame: Month 0, Month 24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24Baseline41.3 ScoresStandard Deviation 16.4
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24Change from baseline-10.1 ScoresStandard Deviation 15
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24Baseline42.2 ScoresStandard Deviation 12.8
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24Change from baseline-4.9 ScoresStandard Deviation 8.8
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24Baseline47.2 ScoresStandard Deviation 13.8
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 24Change from baseline-6.3 ScoresStandard Deviation 9.7
Secondary

Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6

Reported results are baseline (month 0) and change from baseline (at month 6) of end of disease and age specific HRQOL. HRQOL was collected through use of the patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments, HAEMO-QOL (for children (8-12 years)/adolescents (13-16 years)) and HAEM-A-QOL (for adults (\>=17 years)). HAEMO-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, family, friends, perceived support, other persons, sports and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, and relationships. HAEM-A-QOL assessment included questions on physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports and leisure, work and school, dealing with haemophilia, treatment, future, family planning, and partnership and sexuality. Scores range for each question was 0-100, with a lower score indicating better quality of life related to haemophilia. Observed mean of the means of all the questions for HAEMO-QOL and HAEM-A-QOL, respectively are presented.

Time frame: Month 0, Month 6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6Baseline41.3 ScoresStandard Deviation 16.4
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6Change from baseline-6.8 ScoresStandard Deviation 14.5
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6Baseline42.2 ScoresStandard Deviation 12.8
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6Change from baseline-3.5 ScoresStandard Deviation 3.6
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6Baseline47.2 ScoresStandard Deviation 13.8
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Change in Total Scores for Reported Health-related Quality of Life (for Participants): Month 6Change from baseline-3.4 ScoresStandard Deviation 12.8
Secondary

Clearance (CL)

Blood samples for the evaluation of CL were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.

Time frame: Days 1-2

Population: Full analysis set excluding outliers. The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Exceptional outlier PK profiles and/or individual plasma concentrations were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Clearance (CL)3.7 mL/h/kgStandard Deviation 0.9
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Clearance (CL)3.5 mL/h/kgStandard Deviation 1.2
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Clearance (CL)5.5 mL/h/kgStandard Deviation 2.2
Adults (>=18 Years)Clearance (CL)3.5 mL/h/kgStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (24 Months)

Average preventive dose of turoctocog alfa consumed per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (24 Months)47.97 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 8
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (24 Months)40.33 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 7.05
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (24 Months)36.20 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 7.15
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (24 Months)38.13 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 7.51
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (6 Months)

Average preventive dose of turoctocog alfa consumed per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (6 Months)47.05 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 9.21
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (6 Months)39.46 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 7.12
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (6 Months)35.40 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 7.41
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: Average Preventive Dose (6 Months)37.28 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 5.22
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)

Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight (BW) per month) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)606.3 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 118.5
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)533.0 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 82.9
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)467.6 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 91.4
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)490.8 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 115.7
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)

Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight (BW) per month) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)600.3 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 112.6
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)522.5 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 87.59
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)454.5 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 92.79
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)500.7 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 84.39
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)

Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight (BW) per year) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)7276 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1422
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)6396 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 994.7
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)5611 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1097
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)5890 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1388
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)

Preventive dose of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per year) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)7204 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1351
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)6270 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1051
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)5454 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1113
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa During Preventive Treatment Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)6009 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1013
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (24 Months)

Average dose of turoctocog alfa used to treat a bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (24 Months)43.99 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 6.95
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (24 Months)36.00 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 12.32
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (24 Months)43.58 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 6.93
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (24 Months)21.07 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 7.49
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (6 Months)

Average dose of turoctocog alfa used to treat a bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (6 Months)42.96 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 5.35
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (6 Months)36.69 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 14.04
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (6 Months)46.79 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 5.31
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Average Dose to Treat a Bleed (6 Months)20.29 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 6.48
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (24 Months)

Consumption of turoctocog alfa IU/kg BW per bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (24 Months)59.01 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 28.61
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (24 Months)44.75 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 34.15
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (24 Months)45.07 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 15.33
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (24 Months)27.44 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 22.52
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (6 Months)

Consumption of turoctocog alfa IU/kg BW per bleed in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (6 Months)56.60 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 25.32
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (6 Months)42.37 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 26.54
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (6 Months)48.82 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 15.05
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: IU/kg Per Bleed (6 Months)26.20 IU/kg BWStandard Deviation 17.55
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (24 Months)

Number of turoctocog alfa injections consumed to treat a bleeding episode in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (24 Months)1.34 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.62
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (24 Months)1.30 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.88
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (24 Months)1.09 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.3
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (24 Months)1.33 InjectionsStandard Deviation 1.21
Secondary

Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (6 Months)

Number of turoctocog alfa injections consumed to treat a bleeding episode in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (6 Months)1.31 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.59
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (6 Months)1.22 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.61
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (6 Months)1.07 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.26
Adults (>=18 Years)Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa for Bleeding Treatment: Number of Injections Per Bleed (6 Months)1.29 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Frequency of Adverse Events (24 Months)

Frequency of adverse events (AEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of AEs per patient years. All presented AEs are treatment emergent (TEAEs), which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (24 Months)2.941 Events per person-year
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (24 Months)1.210 Events per person-year
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (24 Months)1.074 Events per person-year
Adults (>=18 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (24 Months)1.123 Events per person-year
Secondary

Frequency of Adverse Events (6 Months)

Frequency of adverse events (AEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of AEs per patient years. All presented AEs are treatment emergent (TEAEs), which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (6 Months)4.908 Events per person-year
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (6 Months)2.093 Events per person-year
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (6 Months)2.325 Events per person-year
Adults (>=18 Years)Frequency of Adverse Events (6 Months)1.922 Events per person-year
Secondary

Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (24 Months)

Frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of SAEs per patient years. All presented SAEs are treatment emergent, which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (24 Months)0.065 Events per person-year
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (24 Months)0 Events per person-year
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (24 Months)0.161 Events per person-year
Adults (>=18 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (24 Months)0 Events per person-year
Secondary

Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (6 Months)

Frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) are presented as rate of events, which was calculated as the number of SAEs per patient years. All presented SAEs are treatment emergent, which were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (6 Months)0 Events per person-year
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (6 Months)0 Events per person-year
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (6 Months)0.634 Events per person-year
Adults (>=18 Years)Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (6 Months)0 Events per person-year
Secondary

Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 Months

The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for surgery was evaluated during month 0-24. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response (excellent, good, moderate and none) and assessed by the investigator/surgeon on the day of surgery (day 1) and on the last day in the post-operative period the participant was at the trial/surgery site. Haemostatic response of 'not applicable' indicated that turoctocog alfa was not used.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Excellent3 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Good1 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: None0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Not applicable2 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Excellent5 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Good0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: None0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Not applicable1 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Excellent1 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Excellent2 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Good3 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Not applicable0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: Good2 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: None0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsAfter surgery: None0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 24 MonthsDuring surgery: Not applicable0 Surgeries
Secondary

Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 Months

The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for surgery was evaluated during month 0-6. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response (excellent, good, moderate and none) and assessed by the investigator/surgeon on the day of surgery (day 1) and on the last day in the post-operative period the participant was at the trial/surgery site.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: Excellent2 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: Good1 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: None0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: Excellent3 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: Good0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: None0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: None0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: Excellent1 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: Excellent2 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: Good2 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: Moderate0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsAfter surgery: Good1 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Surgery): 6 MonthsDuring surgery: None0 Surgeries
Secondary

Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 Months

The haemostatic effect of turoctocog alfa when used for treatment of bleeding episodes in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24. The effect was assessed on a four-point scale for haemostatic response, excellent, good, moderate and none.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants with bleeding episodes, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsModerate2 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsExcellent45 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsGood18 Bleeding episodes
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsMissing0 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsModerate26 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsGood103 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsExcellent275 Bleeding episodes
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsMissing1 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsExcellent42 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsGood11 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsModerate0 Bleeding episodes
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsMissing0 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsNone0 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsGood116 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsExcellent272 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsMissing0 Bleeding episodes
Adults (>=18 Years)Haemostatic Effect of Turoctocog Alfa (Treatment of Bleeds): 24 MonthsModerate14 Bleeding episodes
Secondary

Half-life (t½)

Blood samples for the evaluation of t½ were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.

Time frame: Days 1-2

Population: Full analysis set excluding outliers. The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Exceptional outlier PK profiles and/or individual plasma concentrations were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Half-life (t½)8.5 Hour (h)Standard Deviation 1.4
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Half-life (t½)8.3 Hour (h)Standard Deviation 3.1
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Half-life (t½)11.6 Hour (h)Standard Deviation 0.6
Adults (>=18 Years)Half-life (t½)8.4 Hour (h)Standard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Highest Measured FVIII Activity in the Profile (Cmax)

Blood samples for the evaluation of Cmax were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.

Time frame: Days 1-2

Population: Full analysis set excluding outliers. The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Exceptional outlier PK profiles and/or individual plasma concentrations were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Highest Measured FVIII Activity in the Profile (Cmax)1.2 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.2
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Highest Measured FVIII Activity in the Profile (Cmax)1.4 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.3
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Highest Measured FVIII Activity in the Profile (Cmax)0.9 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.5
Adults (>=18 Years)Highest Measured FVIII Activity in the Profile (Cmax)1.6 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 24 Months

This endpoint presented 'percentage of participants with inhibitory antibodies against FVIII (≥0.6 BU)' in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen, evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 24 Months0 Percentage of participants
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 24 Months0 Percentage of participants
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 24 Months0 Percentage of participants
Adults (>=18 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 24 Months0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 6 Months

This endpoint presented 'percentage of participants with inhibitory antibodies against FVIII (≥0.6 BU)' in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen, evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 6 Months0 Percentage of participants
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 6 Months0 Percentage of participants
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 6 Months0 Percentage of participants
Adults (>=18 Years)Incidence Rate of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FVIII (≥0.6 BU): 6 Months0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Incremental Recovery of FVIII

Blood samples for the evaluation of incremental recovery of FVIII were taken during a period of 48 hours post-dosing for participants 12 years and older and 24 hours post-dosing for participants below the age of 12 years. The incremental recovery was calculated as (FVIII: coagulant (C) activity measured in plasma 30 minutes after dosing - FVIII:C activity measured in plasma immediately before dosing)/(dose injected at time 0 minute), where the dose was expressed as IU FVIII product per kg body weight. The results are based on the chromogenic assay.

Time frame: Days 1-2

Population: Full analysis set excluding outliers. The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Exceptional outlier pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and/or individual plasma concentrations were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Incremental Recovery of FVIII0.022 (IU/mL)/(IU/kg BW)Standard Deviation 0.003
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Incremental Recovery of FVIII0.026 (IU/mL)/(IU/kg BW)Standard Deviation 0.005
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Incremental Recovery of FVIII0.014 (IU/mL)/(IU/kg BW)Standard Deviation 0.007
Adults (>=18 Years)Incremental Recovery of FVIII0.026 (IU/mL)/(IU/kg BW)Standard Deviation 0.004
Secondary

Loss of Blood (Surgery): 24 Months

Loss of blood was evaluated during month 0-24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen. Overall Number of Units Analyzed = number of surgeries where blood loss happened.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Loss of Blood (Surgery): 24 Months2.0 mLStandard Deviation 1.4
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Loss of Blood (Surgery): 24 Months81.3 mLStandard Deviation 89.5
Secondary

Loss of Blood (Surgery): 6 Months

Loss of blood was evaluated during month 0-6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen. Overall Number of Units Analyzed = number of surgeries where blood loss happened.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Loss of Blood (Surgery): 6 Months2.0 mLStandard Deviation 1.4
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Loss of Blood (Surgery): 6 Months106.7 mLStandard Deviation 90.2
Secondary

Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 24 Months

Number of bleeds (total bleeds assessed as annual bleeding rate) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-24. The annualised bleeding rate was analysed by a negative binomial model.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 24 Months2.28 Bleeding episodes/year
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 24 Months2.63 Bleeding episodes/year
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 24 Months1.97 Bleeding episodes/year
Adults (>=18 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 24 Months4.97 Bleeding episodes/year
Secondary

Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 6 Months

Number of bleeds (total bleeds assessed as annual bleeding rate) per participant in the prophylaxis regimen was evaluated during month 0-6. The annualised bleeding rate was analysed by a negative binomial model.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from the prophylaxis regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 6 Months4.36 Bleeding episodes/year
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 6 Months4.11 Bleeding episodes/year
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 6 Months2.34 Bleeding episodes/year
Adults (>=18 Years)Number of Bleeds (Total Bleeds Assessed as Annual Bleeding Rate) Per Participant: 6 Months10.67 Bleeding episodes/year
Secondary

Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 24 Months

Surgeries required transfusion was evaluated during month 0-24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 24 Months0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 24 Months0 Surgeries
Secondary

Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 6 Months

Surgeries required transfusion was evaluated during month 0-6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant was at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 6 Months0 Surgeries
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Requirements for Transfusion (Surgery): 6 Months0 Surgeries
Secondary

Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 Months

Treatment emergent serious adverse events occurred during surgery were recorded from month 0 to month 24: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant is at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. Treatment emergent events were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 Months0 Events
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 24 Months0 Events
Secondary

Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 Months

Treatment emergent serious adverse events occurred during surgery were recorded from month 0 to month 6: on the day of surgery (day 1) and during the post-operative period days 2-7 or until the last day the participant is at the trial/surgery site whatever comes first. Treatment emergent events were defined as the events reported after trial product administration until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of the trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who underwent surgeries, from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 Months0 Events
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Serious Adverse Events (Surgery): 6 Months0 Events
Secondary

Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)

Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per month) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)615.3 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 123.8
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)516.7 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 121.1
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)477.0 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 94.37
Adults (>=18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (24 Months)429.1 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 192.7
Secondary

Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)

Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per month) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)603.5 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 141.2
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)496.0 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 146.7
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)479.6 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 103.9
Adults (>=18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Month (6 Months)377.2 IU/kg BW/month/participantStandard Deviation 218.9
Secondary

Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)

Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per year) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-24.

Time frame: Month 0-24

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)7384 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1486
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)6201 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1453
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)5724 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1132
Adults (>=18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (24 Months)5149 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 2312
Secondary

Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)

Total consumption of turoctocog alfa (IU/kg body weight per year) per participant in both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen was evaluated during month 0-6.

Time frame: Month 0-6

Population: The full analysis set included all dosed participants with data after dosing. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants from both prophylaxis and on-demand regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Small Children (0 to <6 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)7242 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1695
Older Children (6 to <12 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)5951 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1760
Adolescents (12 to <18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)5756 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 1247
Adults (>=18 Years)Total Consumption of Turoctocog Alfa Per Participant: IU/kg Per Year (6 Months)4527 IU/kg BW/year/participantStandard Deviation 2627

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026