Skip to content

Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Anesthetics III

Parameters in Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Topical Anesthetics: Role of Laser Type and Laser Settings

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02938286
Enrollment
15
Registered
2016-10-19
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2017-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local Anesthesia of the Skin

Keywords

Fractional laser, Topical anesthesia, Drug delivery, CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of pretreatment with two different ablative laser modalities, a CO2 laser and an Er:YAG laser, and to assess the role of laser density in fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia.

Detailed description

Rationale: In dermatology anesthetics are frequently injected or topically applied to achieve local anesthesia. Injectable anesthetics are effective but uncomfortable during administration, especially for people who are needle phobic. Application of topical anesthesia is painless but time consuming and often only partial aesthesia is achieved due to the barrier function of the stratum corneum. (Manuskiatti, Triwongwaranat et al. 2010) Penetration of local anesthetics could be enhanced by pretreatment of the skin with ablative fractional lasers (AFXL) which locally disrupts the stratum corneum by creating an array of microscopic ablation channels. (Sklar, Burnett et al. 2014) In a previous pilot study, conducted at our institute, we demonstrated that effective anesthesia could be achieved within ten minutes after application of a topical anesthetic on skin pretreated with AFXL at painless settings. (Meesters, Bakker et al. 2015) However, little is still known about the role of the type of fractional laser used (e.g. CO2 or Er:YAG laser), the laser settings, the type of anesthetic and the occlusion time on the efficacy of the anesthesia. Objective: The objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy of pretreatment with two different ablative laser modalities, a CO2 laser and an Er:YAG laser, and to assess the role of laser density in fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia. Study design: Prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled, within subject, pilot study. Study population: 15 healthy volunteers ≥18 years, who give written informed consent Intervention: In each subject, four test regions on subject's back of 1x1 cm will be randomly allocated to (I) pretreatment with the fractional CO2 laser at 5% density, (II) pretreatment with the fractional CO2 laser at 15% density, (III) pretreatment with the fractional Er:YAG laser at 5% density and (IV) pretreatment with the fractional Er:YAG laser at 15% density. After pretreatment, articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml + epinephrine 10 μg/ml 30 solution (AHES) will be applied on the test regions with 15 minutes occlusion time. After 15 minutes a pain stimulus, consisting of a pass with the fractional CO2 laser at 50 mJ and 5% density (scanned area 6x6 mm), will be given at each test region. In addition, a reference pain stimulus with the CO2 laser at the same settings will be given at unanesthetized skin. Subjects will be asked to indicate pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) directly after each pain stimulus.

Interventions

DEVICEFractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 5% density

Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 5% density. Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density

DEVICEFractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 15% density

Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 15% density. Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density

DEVICEFractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 5% density

Pretreatment at 9 mJ and 5% density.

DEVICEFractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 15% density

Pretreatment at 9 mJ and 15% density.

Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density

DRUGAHES

Topical application at test region I-IV under occlusion for 15 minutes

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
CollaboratorOTHER
Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fitzpatrick skin type I or II * Age ≥18 years * Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation or complicated wound healing * Presence of any active skin disease * Known allergy to local anesthesia * Pregnancy or lactation * Incompetency to understand what the procedure involves * Current complaints of chronic pain or other alterations in pain sensation (e.g. due to diabetes mellitus or lepra) * Current treatment with systemic analgesics or other medication that can influence pain sensation * Current treatment with anticoagulants * Fitzpatrick skin type III-VI * Excessive sun tan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scoreAfter 15 minutes incubation time of the anestheticsThe main study parameter is pain, as scored on a VAS from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scoreDirectly after pretreatment.The secondary study parameter is pain, as scored on a VAS from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) directly after pretreatment

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026