Denture Retention
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this 4-treatment, 4-period, randomized, crossover, proof of principle bite force study will be to compare bite force measurements over a 12 hour period across two (test) cream denture adhesives, with a currently marketed cream denture adhesive (positive control), and a negative/no treatment control.
Detailed description
This will be a 4-treatment, 4-period, randomized, crossover, proof of principle bite force study which will compare bite force measurements over a 12 hour period across two cream denture adhesives with a currently marketed cream denture adhesive (positive control), and a negative/no treatment control. A short questionnaire regarding the flavor and texture characteristics of each denture adhesive after a single use will also be administered to give an indication of participant satisfaction of these attributes.
Interventions
DEVICETest Product 1
Test adhesive 1 with a thin nozzle
DEVICETest Product 2
Test adhesive 2 with a thin nozzle
DEVICEReference Product
Adhesive Cream
OTHERNegative Control
No adhesive
Sponsors
GlaxoSmithKline
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form. * Aged between 18 to 85 years. * Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee: No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination and absence of any condition that could affect the participant's safety or wellbeing or their ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements. * Completely edentulous maxillary arch restored with a conventional full acrylic based upper complete denture. Dentate, partial or full edentulous mandibular arch. Partial or full edentulous arch may be restored with a stable complete, partial or implant supported denture. Maxillary dentures must be considered to be moderately well-fitting at the screening visit (Kapur Index, Olshan Modification: retention score \>=2, stability score \>=2). Maxillary dentures and mandibular dentures, if present, must be considered to be well-made based on design and construction criteria specified in the protocol. The qualifying maxillary incisal bite force readings (without adhesive) must be less than or equal to 9 pounds (lb) at the Screening Visit and subsequent visit pre-treatment baseline bites. At least 2 of the 4 qualifying bite readings at the Screening Visit must be reproducible (+/- 2lb). At subsequent visits the bite force readings must be within +/-2lb for 1 of the 3 practice bites and the pre-treatment baseline bite. * Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.
Exclusion criteria
* A woman who is known to be pregnant or who is intending to become pregnant (self reported) over the duration of the study. * A woman who is breast-feeding. * Implanted with a cardiac pacemaker. * Daily doses of medication that might interfere with the ability to perform the study according to protocol (as determined by the Investigator). * Taking or have taken a bisphosphonate drug for treatment of osteoporosis. * A serious chronic disease requiring hospitalization. * Any condition not previously mentioned that in the Investigator's opinion may impair the study evaluation. * Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients. * Any clinically significant or relevant oral abnormality (e.g. temporomandibular joint \[TMJ\] problems) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the participant's participation in the study. * Any participant clinically identified as having an incisal bite relation which could affect the bite force measurements. * Severe dry mouth that may affect denture retention in the opinion of the Investigator. * OST examination findings such as stomatitis, open sores, lesions, redness or swelling that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the participant's participation in the study. * Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit. * Previous participation in this study. * Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse. * A participant who is unwilling to refrain from smoking, including e-cigarettes and the use of chewing tobacco or other tobacco products for the duration of screening and each treatment day (12-14 hours). * An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 Versus (vs.) No Adhesive | up to 12 hours | Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (pounds \[lbs\]). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values. |
| Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. No Adhesive | up to 12 hours | Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Positive Control Adhesive | up to 12 hours | Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values. |
| Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. Positive Control Adhesive | up to 12 hours | Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values. |
| Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Test Adhesive 2 | up to 12 hours | Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
All participants were recruited at a single center in USA.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 37 participants were screened. Out of which 23 participants were randomized in the study. 14 participants were not randomized in the study because 12 of which were screened failure, one participant withdrew consent and one participant was dismissed because number of participants required being reached.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Overall Study Participants All randomized participants who received all four treatments: test adhesive 1, test adhesive 2, positive control adhesive and no adhesive were included in the baseline assessment. | 23 |
| Total | 23 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Deviation | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Overall Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 15 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 21 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 20 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 21 | 3 / 22 | 2 / 21 | 0 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 21 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 20 |
Outcome results
Primary
Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 Versus (vs.) No Adhesive
Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (pounds \[lbs\]). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values.
Time frame: up to 12 hours
Population: Analysis for this outcome was performed on intent-to-treat (ITT) population which included all randomized participants with at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed are the participants from ITT population analyzed for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Adhesive 1 | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 Versus (vs.) No Adhesive | 2.09 lbs | Standard Error 0.34 |
| No Adhesive | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 Versus (vs.) No Adhesive | 1.43 lbs | Standard Error 0.33 |
p-value: 0.17795% CI: [-0.14, 1.47]ANCOVA
Primary
Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. No Adhesive
Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values.
Time frame: up to 12 hours
Population: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population which included all randomized participants with at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed are the participants from ITT population analyzed for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Adhesive 1 | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. No Adhesive | 1.23 lbs | Standard Error 0.33 |
| No Adhesive | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. No Adhesive | 1.43 lbs | Standard Error 0.33 |
p-value: 0.832195% CI: [-0.98, 0.59]ANCOVA
Secondary
Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Positive Control Adhesive
Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values.
Time frame: up to 12 hours
Population: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population which included all randomized participants with at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed are the participants from ITT population analyzed for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Adhesive 1 | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Positive Control Adhesive | 2.09 lbs | Standard Error 0.34 |
| No Adhesive | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Positive Control Adhesive | 2.02 lbs | Standard Error 0.33 |
p-value: 0.856695% CI: [-0.72, 0.87]ANCOVA
Secondary
Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Test Adhesive 2
Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values.
Time frame: up to 12 hours
Population: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population which included all randomized participants with at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed are the participants from ITT population analyzed for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Adhesive 1 | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Test Adhesive 2 | 2.09 lbs | Standard Error 0.34 |
| No Adhesive | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 vs. Test Adhesive 2 | 1.23 lbs | Standard Error 0.33 |
p-value: 0.035295% CI: [0.06, 1.66]ANCOVA
Secondary
Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. Positive Control Adhesive
Area over baseline over 12 hours (AOB0-12) was assessed to measure the incisal bite force. AOB0-12 was calculated as area under the curve over 12 hours \[AUC0-12\])/12 hours minus baseline bite force (lbs). AUC0-12 was calculated using the trapezoidal method. This transformation returned the measurement to the same scale as the original observations. Higher values of AOB0-12 demonstrate a stronger bite force overtime than lower values.
Time frame: up to 12 hours
Population: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population which included all randomized participants with at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed are the participants from ITT population analyzed for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Adhesive 1 | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. Positive Control Adhesive | 1.23 lbs | Standard Error 0.33 |
| No Adhesive | Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 2 vs. Positive Control Adhesive | 2.02 lbs | Standard Error 0.33 |
p-value: 0.048895% CI: [-1.58, 0]ANCOVA