Skip to content

Study Assessing Injection Pain of Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL) When Administered Via Subcutaneous Auto-injector vs Intramuscular Injection Via Needle and Syringe in Healthy Post-menopausal Women

A Phase III, Single-Center, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Study Assessing Injection Pain of Preservative-free Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL) When Administered Via Subcutaneous Auto-injector vs Intramuscular Injection Via Needle and Syringe in Healthy Post-menopausal Women

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02937766
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-10-19
Start date
2016-10-07
Completion date
2017-03-27
Last updated
2022-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessing Injection Pain of Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL) in Healthy Post-menopausal Women

Brief summary

To demonstrate that Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL) delivered subcutaneously via auto-injector is associated with less pain as compared to intramuscular injections of Makena®

Interventions

Sponsors

AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Female subjects aged 50 to 75 years of age, inclusive, at Screening Visit. 2. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels greater than 40 mIU/mL. 3. Naturally or surgically postmenopausal with or without an intact uterus.

Exclusion criteria

1. Have history of or positive test results for HIV or hepatitis B or C. 2. A significant history or current evidence of chronic infectious disease, organ dysfunction especially cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic disorders or other medical condition. 3. Receiving or have received chronic opioid therapy within 12 months. 4. Unwilling to stop taking/using: * pain medication. * topical analgesic or anti-inflammatory treatment. Topical analgesics must be washed out by at least 72 hours in the areas to be treated before randomization. 5. History of alcohol abuse (regularly drinks \> 4 units of alcohol per day; 8 oz. beer, 3 oz. wine, 1 oz. spirits) or prescription/illicit drug abuse in the last 12 months. 6. Currently taking any estrogen/progesterone hormone replacement therapy (HRT). 7. History of allergy or sensitivity to hydroxyprogesterone caproate, castor oil or any of the constituents of the study medications or history of any drug hypersensitivity or intolerance. 8. Poorly controlled diabetes (Hgb A1C \>8). 9. Current or history of thrombosis or thromboembolic disorders. 10. Known or suspected breast cancer, other hormone-sensitive cancer or tumor, or history of these conditions within the last 5 years. 11. Any current or recent (within previous 12 months) vaginal bleeding. 12. Uncontrolled hypertension. 13. A chronic pain condition (i.e. chronic back pain) that may confound the assessments of injection pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Average Pain Intensity4 weeksComparison of average pain intensity associated with the administration of Makena® via subcutaneous autoinjector versus intramuscular injection (averaged over 4 visits). Score on a scale: 0 (No Pain) up to 10 (Worst Pain Imaginable)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinician Assessment of Ease of Injection Technique4 weeksInvestigate the clinician's assessment of the ease of injection technique associated with the administration of Makena® via subcutaneous auto-injector versus intramuscular injection as measured by a categorical scale. Scores were as follows: completely dissatisfied = -3; mostly dissatisfied = -2, somewhat dissatisfied = -1, neither satisfied nor unsatisfied = 0, somewhat satisfied = 1, mostly satisfied = 2, completely satisfied = 3
Clinician Assessment of Ease of Drug Preparation4 weeksInvestigate the clinician's assessment of the ease of drug preparation associated with the administration of Makena® via subcutaneous auto-injector versus intramuscular injection as measured by a categorical scale. Scores were as follows: completely dissatisfied = -3; mostly dissatisfied = -2, somewhat dissatisfied = -1, neither satisfied nor unsatisfied = 0, somewhat satisfied = 1, mostly satisfied = 2, completely satisfied = 3

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment A
Subcutaneous (SQ) injection using an autoinjector weekly over 4 weeks (4 injections) Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL)
30
Treatment B
Intramuscular injection (IM) using syringe and needle weekly over 4 weeks (4 injections) Makena® (Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Injection, 250 mg/mL)
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment BTreatment ATotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
27 Participants23 Participants50 Participants
Age, Continuous56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.23
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.39
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.55
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 3013 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Average Pain Intensity

Comparison of average pain intensity associated with the administration of Makena® via subcutaneous autoinjector versus intramuscular injection (averaged over 4 visits). Score on a scale: 0 (No Pain) up to 10 (Worst Pain Imaginable)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: The Comparison of Average Pain Intensity outcome was not analyzed. Pain assessments for participants included Adverse Events of Injection Site Pain reporting. 3 participants in Treatment Group A and 2 participants in Treatment Group B reported Injection Site Pain.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment AComparison of Average Pain Intensity3 Participants with Injection Site Pain
Treatment BComparison of Average Pain Intensity2 Participants with Injection Site Pain
Secondary

Clinician Assessment of Ease of Drug Preparation

Investigate the clinician's assessment of the ease of drug preparation associated with the administration of Makena® via subcutaneous auto-injector versus intramuscular injection as measured by a categorical scale. Scores were as follows: completely dissatisfied = -3; mostly dissatisfied = -2, somewhat dissatisfied = -1, neither satisfied nor unsatisfied = 0, somewhat satisfied = 1, mostly satisfied = 2, completely satisfied = 3

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis population is comprised of all subjects who were randomized and received study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment AClinician Assessment of Ease of Drug Preparation2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Treatment BClinician Assessment of Ease of Drug Preparation2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
p-value: 0.23495% CI: [-0.2, 0.7]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Clinician Assessment of Ease of Injection Technique

Investigate the clinician's assessment of the ease of injection technique associated with the administration of Makena® via subcutaneous auto-injector versus intramuscular injection as measured by a categorical scale. Scores were as follows: completely dissatisfied = -3; mostly dissatisfied = -2, somewhat dissatisfied = -1, neither satisfied nor unsatisfied = 0, somewhat satisfied = 1, mostly satisfied = 2, completely satisfied = 3

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis population is comprised of all subjects who were randomized and received study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment AClinician Assessment of Ease of Injection Technique2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Treatment BClinician Assessment of Ease of Injection Technique2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
p-value: 0.09395% CI: [-0.1, 0.9]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026