Morbid Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
Obesity, Bariatric surgery, Sleeve gastrectomy, Staple-line Leak, Bougie, Calibration
Brief summary
Staple-line leak is the most frequent and incapacitating complication after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to compare the staple-line leak rate after LSG according to the use of a standard bougie calibre (34, 36 or 38 Fr) or 48-Fr, assuming that a higher diameter is correlated with a lower risk of leak, without lowering long-term weight loss.
Detailed description
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become an increasing bariatric procedure. The most common complication is gastric leak from the staple line, observed in approximately 3% of cases, and can result in long and incapacitating treatment. The diameter of the bougie used to calibrate the remnant stomach could impact the rate of gastric leak, a higher diameter being correlated with a lower risk of leak, without lowering long-term weight loss. The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to compare the outcomes of LSG according to the use of a standard care bougie calibre or 48-Fr on postoperative gastric leak and mid-term weight loss.
Interventions
After gastric mobilization, the 48-Fr bougie is inserted through the mouth by the anesthesiologist and positioned in the stomach. Patient is blind to the type of bougie used. Gastrectomy is performed alongside the calibration bougie.
After gastric mobilization, the standard care bougie is inserted through the mouth by the anesthesiologist and positioned in the stomach. Patient is blind to the type of bougie used. Gastrectomy is performed alongside the calibration bougie.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients between 18 and 70 years * Sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure * Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m² or \> 35 kg/m² associated with at least one comorbidity susceptible to improve after surgery (including arterial hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and other severe respiratory disorders, severe metabolic disorders, particularly type 2 diabetes, incapacitating osteo-articular disorders, non alcoholic steatohepatitis) * Decision for intervention after multidisciplinary discussion * Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Previous upper abdominal surgery (cholecystectomy excepted) * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score \> 3 * Ongoing pregnancy or breast feeding * Esophagus pathology or disorder (esophageal varices, esophageal diverticula, esophageal tumors, esophageal strictures) * Coagulation disorder * Patient not covered by social security service and patient on AME * Patient under legal guardianship and trusteeship * Patient with known silicon allergy (calibration bougie contains medical silicon) * More generally, all other contraindications to the use of esophageal bougie MID-TUBE that have been the subject of a scientific paper or have been identified by the practitioner or practitioners
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative gastric leak rate | 30 days following the procedure | Postoperative gastric leak rate during the first month following the procedure will be proven either on: * Morphologic examination (with contrast ingestion) * Blue dye test during surgical reintervention or postoperative course * Contrast opacification during endoscopy |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative morbidity rate | 90 days following the procedure | Postoperative morbidity rate will be calculated regarding any complication occurring 90 days following the procedure. |
| Short-term weight loss | At 3 and 6 months after the procedure | Short-term weight loss will be assessed by calculation of excess weight loss at 3 and 6 months after the procedure. |
| Mid-term weight loss | At 1 and 2 years after the procedure | Mid-term weight loss will be assessed by calculation of excess weight loss at 1 and 2 years after the procedure. |
| Quality of life related to health | At 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the procedure | Quality of life related to health will be assessed at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the procedure with the validated GIQLI scale (Gastro Intestinal Quality of Life Index) |
Countries
France