Skip to content

To Look or Not to Look at the Needle During Vaccination

To Look or Not to Look? Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of a Simple Psychological Intervention in Reducing Vaccination Pain and Fear in Adult

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02937428
Enrollment
160
Registered
2016-10-18
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2016-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaccination

Keywords

vaccination, pain, fear, psychological intervention

Brief summary

It is common for people to advise individuals undergoing vaccination to look away from the needle to make them hurt less and be less scary. However, this advice is not backed up by research evidence. the purpose of this study is to learn about how looking away vs. looking at the needle during vaccination makes people feel. People will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups: look at the needle, look away. Then they will undergo vaccination and report on pain and fear experienced.

Detailed description

It is common for people to advise individuals undergoing vaccination to look away from the needle to make them hurt less and be less scary. However, this advice is not backed up by experimental research evidence. It is possible that looking away acts as a distraction and takes attention away from the needle, thus reducing pain. However, it is also possible that looking at the needle is better because it prevents people's imaginations from making them think it is worse than it actually is. To our knowledge, this is the first first randomized study to examine the effect of looking away vs. looking at the needle on pain and fear experienced during vaccinations. Adult university students undergoing routine flu vaccination will be included.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLook away from the needle

Participant looks away from the needle during vaccination

BEHAVIORALLook at the needle

Participant looks at the needle during vaccination

Sponsors

University of Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* undergraduate and graduate students at the University of Toronto's Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy undergoing flu vaccination

Exclusion criteria

* less than 18 years of age or prior participation in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Painimmediately after vaccination (<5 minutes)self-reported pain assessed after vaccination using a numerical rating scale (0-10)
Fearimmediately after vaccination (<5 minutes)self-reported fear assessed after vaccination using a numerical rating scale (0-10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of appointmentimmediately after vaccinationAmount of time taken for appointment as per clock
Attrition of participantsimmediately after vaccinationnumber of participants that are lost/drop-out of study
Recruitment ratebefore vaccination (1 day to 4 weeks)percentage of people eligible that participate
Fidelity of interventionDuring vaccinationCompliance with instruction to look at the needle or look away, according to checklist
Preferences of participantsimmediately after vaccination (<5 minutes)participant preferences about interventions according to questionnaire
Feasibility of recruitment of subjects in the 2 study strata (i.e., preference to look or not look)immediately before vaccination (<5 minutes)percentage of individuals that prefer to look or not look at baseline

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactAnna Taddio, PhD
anna.taddio@utoronto.ca416-978-8822

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026