Skip to content

The Effect of Exercise Intervention on the Community's Older Adults

The Effect of Exercise Intervention on the Physical Fitness, Bone Mineral Density and Health-related Quality of Life in the Community's Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02936336
Enrollment
411
Registered
2016-10-18
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2018-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Disease

Brief summary

Osteoporosis is a serious global health problem, second only to cardiovascular disease. Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease in the elderly population, characterized by loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and continuous destruction of bone microstructure, especially in postmenopausal women. It gives rise to bone fragility and fracture risk. Moreover, as people grow older, falls frequently occur with high severity, and nearly 35% to 45% of persons aged 65 or older fall at least once a year. Osteoporotic fractures increase mortality, morbidity, chronic pain, and the cost of social care and it decreases the quality of life. Here, investigators plan to perform different exercise interventions such as circuit exercise, aerobic dance and Tai Chi on the community's older adults to evaluate whether exercise intervention could improve the bone mineral density, physical fitness, muscle strength or quality of life.

Interventions

OTHERexercise

circuit exercise, aerobic dance and Tai Chi exercise

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being \>45 years-of-age, * Healthy and physically independent.

Exclusion criteria

* The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline bone mineral densityPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upBone mineral density measurement is measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Measurements are made over the lumbar spine and over the upper part of the hip and the measurement is assessed at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weight parameters of the subjectsPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upWeight (kg) are measured at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Change from baseline elbow muscle strengthPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upExtension and flexion of elbow were tested by the HUMAC NORM system (CSMi, Stoughton, MA) with the eccentric/concentric contraction mode at an angular velocity of 60 degrees/s.Isokinetic tests were performed five times for each participant, and each test was separated by a rest period of 3 min.The Muscle strength was present as a peak torque which was normalized to body weight (Unit:Nm/kg). The participants are assessed at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Change from baseline shoulder muscle strengthPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upExtension and flexion of shoulder were tested by the HUMAC NORM system (CSMi, Stoughton, MA) with the eccentric/concentric contraction mode at an angular velocity of 60 degrees/s.Isokinetic tests were performed five times for each participant, and each test was separated by a rest period of 3 min.The Muscle strength was present as a peak torque which was normalized to body weight (Unit:Nm/kg). The participants are assessed at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Height parameters of the subjectsPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upHeight (cm) are measured at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Change from baseline hip muscle strengthPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upExtension and flexion of hip were tested by the HUMAC NORM system (CSMi, Stoughton, MA) with the eccentric/concentric contraction mode at an angular velocity of 60 degrees/s.Isokinetic tests were performed five times for each participant, and each test was separated by a rest period of 3 min.The Muscle strength was present as a peak torque which was normalized to body weight (Unit:Nm/kg). The participants are assessed at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Blood pressurePre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upDiastolic and systolic blood pressure are measured at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Change from baseline SF-36 questionnaire assessmentPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upSF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. Eight sections including physical function, role limitation due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitation due to emotional problems, and mental health. Additionally, the eight health domains can be used to provide a physical component summary and mental component summary score. The outcome measurement is assessed at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
High-density lipoprotein from blood samplePre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upHigh-density lipoprotein are measured at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Triglyceride from blood samplePre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upTriglyceride are measured at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Fasting blood glucose from blood samplePre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upFasting blood glucose are measured at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Waistline parameters of the subjectsPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upWaistline (cm) are measured at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.
Change from baseline knee muscle strengthPre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-upExtension and flexion of knee were tested by the HUMAC NORM system (CSMi, Stoughton, MA) with the eccentric/concentric contraction mode at an angular velocity of 60 degrees/s.Isokinetic tests were performed five times for each participant, and each test was separated by a rest period of 3 min.The Muscle strength was present as a peak torque which was normalized to body weight (Unit:Nm/kg). The participants are assessed at Pre-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month-follow-up.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026