Skip to content

Exercise as a Buffer Against Stress-induced Overeating

Exercise as a Buffer Against Stress-induced Overeating

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02936076
Enrollment
49
Registered
2016-10-18
Start date
2017-01-16
Completion date
2019-05-21
Last updated
2021-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological benefits of chronic exercise as well as the effects of exercise training on eating behaviors and stress-induced overeating in overweight and obese women. Participants will be randomized to an 12-week exercise condition or a delayed exercise condition. Assessments will occur at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks and will include answering surveys in real-time using smartphones, several assessments of eating behaviors and dietary intake, and questionnaire measures of factors which could mediate the relationship between exercise and eating. Participants will be compensated for completing assessments and for adherence to the exercise protocol.

Interventions

OTHERExercise intervention
OTHERDelayed exercise intervention

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
The Miriam Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female * 18-60 years of age * BMI 25 to \<40 kg/m2 * Physically inactive (\<60 min/week of physical activity) * Must own a smartphone * Must be willing to receive and respond to text message prompts for 14 days at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Shift workers * Individuals who do not endorse stress-eating * Recent weight loss or current enrollment in a weight loss program * Women who are pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant in the next 6 months * Any medical condition that would limit participation in physical activity * Diabetes * Inability to walk without an assisted device * Inability to meet exercise recommendations * Failure to adequately complete all baseline assessment measures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys12 weeksParticipants completed EMA surveys (5x/day for 14 days). At each prompt they were asked if an eating episode occurred. If they indicated 'yes', they were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If the participant responded with a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'. Further, at each prompt, participants were asked to the respond to the following: 'Right now I feel stressed' (1=not at all, 7=very much so). If the stress score was \>=5 at the prompt just prior to an overeating episode, then it was considered a 'stress-induced overeating episode'.
Percentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'12 weeksIf an eating episode occurred, participants were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If response was a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)baseline and 12 weeksPercent weight change from baseline to 12 weeks
Stress as Measured Via QuestionnaireBaseline and 12 weeksThe 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen 1988) was used to assess changes in stress by treatment arm from baseline to 12 weeks. Scores on this measure range from 0-40 with a higher score indicating greater perceived stress. Presented values are 12 week scores adjusted for baseline values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exercise Condition
Participants randomized to the exercise condition will participate in a 12-week exercise training program. The exercise intervention will consist of both supervised and unsupervised exercise sessions and progress to 200 minutes/week of moderate-intensity exercise. Exercise bouts will be spread across 4-6 days and be at least 20 minutes in duration. During supervised visits, heart rate will be monitored by a member of the research staff to ensure that exercise is within the prescribed intensity range and ratings of perceived exertion and feeling state will be assessed periodically. Unsupervised exercise will be verified using objective physical activity monitors. Exercise intervention
25
Delayed Exercise Condition
Participants randomized to the delayed exercise condition will be asked not to change their exercise or eating habits over the 12-week period and will complete the same assessment measures as the exercise condition. However, following the completion of the 12-week period, participants will be given two options: 1) receive a one-on-one session with an exercise physiologist at our center and receive a written exercise program, and at this time point all study obligations will be completed, or 2) complete the identical exercise protocol as the 'exercise' condition. Delayed exercise intervention
24
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExercise ConditionDelayed Exercise ConditionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants24 Participants49 Participants
Age, Continuous39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants24 participants49 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants24 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'

If an eating episode occurred, participants were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If response was a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exercise ConditionPercentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'21.98 % of eating episodesStandard Deviation 3.32
Delayed Exercise ConditionPercentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'26.62 % of eating episodesStandard Deviation 3.58
Primary

Stress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys

Participants completed EMA surveys (5x/day for 14 days). At each prompt they were asked if an eating episode occurred. If they indicated 'yes', they were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If the participant responded with a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'. Further, at each prompt, participants were asked to the respond to the following: 'Right now I feel stressed' (1=not at all, 7=very much so). If the stress score was \>=5 at the prompt just prior to an overeating episode, then it was considered a 'stress-induced overeating episode'.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exercise ConditionStress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys0.74 episodesStandard Deviation 1.56
Delayed Exercise ConditionStress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys0.55 episodesStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)

Percent weight change from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exercise ConditionChange in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)-1.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.5
Delayed Exercise ConditionChange in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)0.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Stress as Measured Via Questionnaire

The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen 1988) was used to assess changes in stress by treatment arm from baseline to 12 weeks. Scores on this measure range from 0-40 with a higher score indicating greater perceived stress. Presented values are 12 week scores adjusted for baseline values.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Exercise ConditionStress as Measured Via Questionnaire22.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Delayed Exercise ConditionStress as Measured Via Questionnaire21.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026