Skip to content

Effects of Behavioral Interventions on Mechanisms of Pain Regulation and Hedonic Regulation

Effects of Behavioral Interventions on Mechanisms of Pain Regulation and Hedonic Regulation in Opioid-Treated Chronic Pain Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02935465
Enrollment
17
Registered
2016-10-17
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2020-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic, Non-neuropathic Back Pain

Brief summary

The overarching aim of this project is to conduct a randomized controlled study to determine whether Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) vs. a Support Group (SG) can improve pain regulation and hedonic functions (i.e., natural reward responsiveness) thought to be governed by the endogenous opioid system among opioid-treated, chronic, non-neuropathic back pain patients (CNBP) and thereby improve clinical pain, affect, and opioid use.

Interventions

Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) is a group behavioral intervention that unites mindfulness training, cognitive reappraisal, and positive psychological principles into an integrative intervention strategy targeting mechanisms of pain and opioid misuse.

BEHAVIORALSupport Group

A conventional support group will allow participants to express emotions, share experiences, and receive social support under the guidance of a skilled therapist.

Sponsors

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age 21-60 years of age 2. English fluency 3. 20/20 vision with corrective lenses 4. current chronic, non-neuropathic back pain diagnosis determined by physician assessment 5. reporting pain ≥3 on 0-10 scale with opioid medication 6. current use of prescription opioids for ≥3 consecutive months 7. ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Mindfulness experience (e.g., MBSR or shamatha/vipassana meditation) 2. psychosis 3. untreated, active suicidality in the past month 4. and severe non-opioid substance use disorder in the past year as assessed with the MINI 5. clinically unstable illness judged to interfere with treatment, and presence of facial/jaw pain 6. pregnancy 7. inability or unwillingness of individual to give written informed consent 8. physical characteristics that preclude neuroimaging or study procedures (e.g., metal implants, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in endogenous opioid system function in response to pain challengeChange from week 0 to 8 weeksPET opioid receptor binding potential from baseline through pain challenge
Changes in fMRI activity level during natural reward processingChange from week 0 to 8 weeksBlood oxygen dependent signal (BOLD) response during viewing and regulating response to natural reward cues measured during a fMRI scan.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain sensitivity as a measure of volume of hypertonic salineChange from week 0 to 8 weeksVolume of hypertonic saline to maintain pain at 40 out of 100 on a VAS
Self-report affect ratingsChange from week 0 to 8 weeks
Significant correlation between PET and fMRI measures with improvements in clinical pain, affect, and opioid useChange from week 0 to 8 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026