Skip to content

Comparison of Glottic Views and Intubation Times in the Supine and 25 Degree Back-up Positions

Comparison of Glottic Views and Intubation Times in the Supine and 25 Degree Back-up Positions

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02934347
Enrollment
781
Registered
2016-10-17
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2017-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Elective Surgical Patients

Keywords

Intubation, Back-up position; Glottis, View

Brief summary

Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Detailed description

The sniffing position has traditionally been considered the optimal head position for direct laryngoscopy and is the usual patient position preferred by most anaesthetists. In theory, neck flexion aligns the pharyngeal and laryngeal axes, and head extension at the atlanto-occipital joint aligns the oral axis with these two axes allowing the line of sight to fall on the glottis. It is recognized as the starting head position for direct laryngoscopy because it provides the best chance of adequate exposure. However the sniffing position does not guarantee adequate exposure in all patients because many other anatomical factors control the final degree of visualization. To achieve a proper sniffing position in obese patients, the ramped (or the back-up) position has been used as this produces better neck flexion and head extension in these patients when compared to the horizontal supine position. Also the forces required to elevate and move the tongue and other tissues out of the line of sight are less when the patients are ramped. Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all (ie not only obese) patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Interventions

PROCEDURE25 degree back-up position

To test whether a 25 degree back-up position improves laryngeal views and makes intubation easier compared to the standard horizontal position

Sponsors

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult surgical patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients less than 18 years old, 2. Patients recognised to have difficult airways where an alternative method of intubation (e.g. fibre optic) was the method of choice, 3. Patients undergoing emergency surgery where patient positioning and data collection might cause delay (e.g. exsanguinating patients) or where the supine position is not optimal (e.g. brisk bleeding into the upper airway), 4. Patients requiring rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyThe view of the glottis was measured once while the patient was being intubatedThe best glottic view obtained during laryngoscopy was assessed using the Cormack and Lehane classification by the anaesthetist performing the laryngoscopy. The Cormack and Lehane classifies glottic views as follows: Grade 1: Most of the glottis is visible, Grade 2: At best almost half of the glottis is seen, at worst only the posterior tip of the arytenoids is seen., Grade 3: Only the epiglottis is visible, Grade 4: No laryngeal structures are visible.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal IntubationOnce at intubationThe number of attempts at both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were recorded
The Use of Ancillary EquipmentOnce at intubationThe use of ancillary equipment (e.g. bougie, alternative laryngoscope blades) and manoeuvres (e.g. laryngeal manipulation) were recorded but applied at the intubating anaesthetist's discretion
The Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide MonitorOnce at intubationThe time between the beginning of laryngoscopy and detection of carbon dioxide on the end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor after the successful placement of the tracheal tube was recorded

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Supine
A baseline group of adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia who were intubated in the standard horizontal sniffing position.
374
Back-up
A subsequent group of similar the patients who had their anaesthesia induced and tracheas intubated in a 25 degree back-up position achieved by flexion of the operating table at the hips
407
Total781

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSupineBack-upTotal
Age, Continuous57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9
56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
BMI28.5 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
28 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
28.2 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Grade of intubating anaesthetist
Not recorded
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Grade of intubating anaesthetist
Senior
272 participants264 participants536 participants
Grade of intubating anaesthetist
Trainee
101 participants143 participants244 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
374 participants407 participants781 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
188 Participants218 Participants406 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
186 Participants188 Participants374 Participants
Type of surgery
ENT
24 participants43 participants67 participants
Type of surgery
Facio-Maxillary
10 participants62 participants72 participants
Type of surgery
General
248 participants233 participants481 participants
Type of surgery
Gynaecology
44 participants24 participants68 participants
Type of surgery
Not recorded
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Type of surgery
Ophthalmology
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Type of surgery
Orthopaedics
12 participants3 participants15 participants
Type of surgery
Trauma
4 participants18 participants22 participants
Type of surgery
Urology
29 participants19 participants48 participants
Type of surgery
Vascular
2 participants4 participants6 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3740 / 407
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3740 / 407

Outcome results

Primary

The Best Glottic View Obtained During Laryngoscopy

The best glottic view obtained during laryngoscopy was assessed using the Cormack and Lehane classification by the anaesthetist performing the laryngoscopy. The Cormack and Lehane classifies glottic views as follows: Grade 1: Most of the glottis is visible, Grade 2: At best almost half of the glottis is seen, at worst only the posterior tip of the arytenoids is seen., Grade 3: Only the epiglottis is visible, Grade 4: No laryngeal structures are visible.

Time frame: The view of the glottis was measured once while the patient was being intubated

Population: Adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SupineThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 2163 participants
SupineThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 42 participants
SupineThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 323 participants
SupineThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyNot recorded0 participants
SupineThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 1186 participants
Back-upThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyNot recorded2 participants
Back-upThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 1228 participants
Back-upThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 2151 participants
Back-upThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 324 participants
Back-upThe Best Glottic View Obtained During LaryngoscopyCormack and Lehane Grade 42 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no difference in frequency of grade of glottic view between the supine and back-up positionsp-value: >0.05Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

The Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation

The number of attempts at both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were recorded

Time frame: Once at intubation

Population: Adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation1 Laryngoscopy attempt340 participants
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation2 Laryngoscopy attempts25 participants
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation>2 Laryngoscopy attempts5 participants
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal IntubationLaryngoscopy attempts Not recorded4 participants
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation1 Intubation attempt346 participants
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation2 Intubation attempts22 participants
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation>2 Intubation attempts0 participants
SupineThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal IntubationIntubation attempts Not recorded6 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal IntubationIntubation attempts Not recorded10 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation1 Laryngoscopy attempt371 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation1 Intubation attempt378 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation2 Laryngoscopy attempts27 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation>2 Intubation attempts1 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation>2 Laryngoscopy attempts3 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation2 Intubation attempts18 participants
Back-upThe Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal IntubationLaryngoscopy attempts Not recorded6 participants
p-value: <0.01Chi-squared
Secondary

The Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitor

The time between the beginning of laryngoscopy and detection of carbon dioxide on the end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor after the successful placement of the tracheal tube was recorded

Time frame: Once at intubation

Population: Adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
SupineThe Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide MonitorSenior26 seconds
SupineThe Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide MonitorTrainee30 seconds
SupineThe Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide MonitorSenior & Trainee combined28 seconds
Back-upThe Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide MonitorSenior21 seconds
Back-upThe Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide MonitorTrainee27 seconds
Back-upThe Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide MonitorSenior & Trainee combined24 seconds
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

The Use of Ancillary Equipment

The use of ancillary equipment (e.g. bougie, alternative laryngoscope blades) and manoeuvres (e.g. laryngeal manipulation) were recorded but applied at the intubating anaesthetist's discretion

Time frame: Once at intubation

Population: Adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary equipment: Bougie58 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvre: BURP34 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary equipment: 'Not Used'308 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentExternal laryngeal manipulation39 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary equipment use not recorded5 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvres: 'Not Used'277 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentOther Ancillary equipment3 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvres not recorded5 participants
SupineThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvre: Cricoid19 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvres not recorded1 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary equipment: Bougie61 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentOther Ancillary equipment4 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary equipment use not recorded1 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvre: Cricoid2 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvre: BURP25 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentExternal laryngeal manipulation53 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary manoeuvres: 'Not Used'326 participants
Back-upThe Use of Ancillary EquipmentAncillary equipment: 'Not Used'341 participants
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026