Skip to content

The Development of a Personalized Decision Aid: Perspectives of Patients and Health Care Professionals on Shared Decision Making and Informational Needs on Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

The Development of a Personalized Decision Aid: Perspectives of Patients and Health Care Professionals on Shared Decision Making and Informational Needs on Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02934126
Acronym
M16SDM
Enrollment
15
Registered
2016-10-14
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2016-12-28
Last updated
2017-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

Background: The Dutch guideline on breast cancer treatment shows several grey areas, where no clear recommendation is given on the radiotherapy options, but where the advice is to discuss the treatment of choice with the patient. Currently, patients are exposed to different information given by the professionals' personal styles of informing patients. The challenge for all oncological professionals is to give clear, structured, and neutral information on the pros and cons of the treatment option(s) in the context of the natural course of the disease to the patient; to elicit patients' needs and preferences. How and which information should be shared in a decision aid is up for investigation, as well as how this should best be implemented. Research goals: Qualitative assessment of patients' and health care professionals' informational needs and perspectives on breast cancer radiotherapy and shard decision making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews will be held with both breast cancer patients and health care professionals. To reach as heterogeneous groups as possible patients of different ages, with different education levels and who underwent different treatments or chose not to get radiotherapy at all will be selected . Data will be collected til saturation is reached. Interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Results of the qualitative study are expected at the beginning of 2017. Hypothesis: Investigating the patients' and health care professionals' perspectives on shared decision making and informational needs on radiotherapeutic options will help the development of a personalized decision aid eligible for broad implementation.

Detailed description

semi-structured interviews with breast cancer patients and health care professionals.

Interventions

OTHERbreast cancer patients

semi structured face to face interviews

Sponsors

The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 2-3 months after facing decision or \> 1 year after decision * able to speak and understand Dutch * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* recurrence of breast cancer prior to interview

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients' perspectives on informational needs and shared decision making when making a decision on radiation treatment, a qualitative assessment.4 monthsthe face-to face interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The analysis will be performed by two independent researches with help of NVIVO 11
Health care professionals perspectives' on shared decision making and decision tools when facing a preference-sensitive decision on radiation treatment, a qualitative assesment4 monthsthe face-to face interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The analysis will be performed by two independent researches with help of NVIVO 11

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026