Skip to content

Abbreviated Breast MRI and Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography in Screening Women With Dense Breasts

Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breasts

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02933489
Enrollment
1516
Registered
2016-10-14
Start date
2016-12-27
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asymptomatic

Brief summary

This randomized phase II trial studies how well abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital tomosynthesis mammography work in detecting cancer in women with dense breasts. Abbreviated breast MRI is a low cost procedure in which radio waves and a powerful magnet linked to a computer and used to create detailed pictures of the breast in less than 10 minutes. These pictures can show the difference between normal and diseased tissue. Digital tomosynthesis mammography is a procedure that uses multiple x-rays pictures of each breast to produce a 3-dimensional rendering of the entire breast. Combined screening with abbreviated breast MRI and digital tomosynthesis mammography may be a better method to screen women with dense breasts.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the rates of detection of invasive cancers between the initial abbreviated breast (AB)-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsies, call back rates, and short-term follow up rates after AB-MR and DBT on both the initial and 1 year follow up studies. II. To estimate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of AB-MR and DBT, using the 1 year follow up to define a reference standard. III. To compare patient-reported short-term quality of life related to diagnostic testing with AB-MR and DBT using the Testing Morbidities Index. IV. To compare willingness to return for testing with AB-MRI versus (vs) DBT within the recommended screening interval and explore factors associated with willingness to return for screening. V. To compare the tumor biologies of invasive cancers and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected on AB-MR and DBT. VI. To estimate the incident cancer rate during 3 years following the year-1 AB-MR/DBT when patients return to standard screening. OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A (DBT, AB-MR): Participants undergo DBT followed by AB-MR for under 10 minutes on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. ARM B (AB-MR, DBT): Participants undergo AB-MR for under 10 minutes followed by DBT on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. After completion of study, patients are followed up at every 6 months for 3 years.

Interventions

Undergo DBT

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patents must be scheduled for routine screening DBT * Women must not be pregnant or breast-feeding; all females of childbearing potential who are uncertain if they could be pregnant or may be pregnant or as per local site standard of practice in women undergoing DBT and MRI must have a blood test or urine study within 2 weeks prior to randomization to rule out pregnancy; a female of childbearing potential is any woman, regardless of sexual orientation or whether they have undergone tubal ligation, who meets the following criteria: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months) * Women of childbearing potential must be strongly advised to use an accepted and effective method of contraception or to abstain from sexual intercourse for the following year until the year 1 AB-MR and DBT studies are performed * Patient?s breast density must be known; patients must have mammographically dense breasts, American College of Radiology \[ACR\] Breast Imaging \[BI\]- Reporting and Data System Atlas (RADS) lexicon categories c or d (heterogeneous or extreme fibroglandular tissue) on their most-recent prior screening * Patient must be asymptomatic for breast disease and undergoing routine screening * Patient must have no known breast cancer (DCIS or invasive cancer), not currently undergoing treatment for breast cancer, or planning surgery for a high risk lesion (atypical ductal breast hyperplasia \[ADH\], atypical lobular breast hyperplasia \[ALH\], lobular breast carcinoma in situ \[LCIS\], papilloma, radial scar) * Patient must not be taking chemoprevention for breast cancer * Patient must not have undergone breast ultrasound within 12 months prior to randomization * Patient must not have previously had a breast MRI * Patient must not have previously had molecular breast imaging (MBI, multiplexed ion beam imaging \[MIBI\]) * Patient must agree to not undergo screening ultrasound (of breast) for the duration of the 1 year study period * Patient must not be suspected of being at high-risk for breast cancer, as defined by the American Cancer Society (ACS) breast MR screening recommendations (lifetime risk of \>= 20-25%) * Patient must be able to undergo breast MRI with contrast enhancement; patients unable to undergo breast MRI with contrast enhancement for any reason are ineligible * No history of untreatable claustrophobia * No presence of non MR compatible metallic objects or metallic objects that, in the opinion of the radiologist, would make MRI a contraindication * No history of sickle cell disease * No contraindication to intravenous contrast administration * No known allergy-like reaction to gadolinium or moderate or severe allergic reactions to one or more allergens as defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR); patient may be eligible if willing to undergo pre-treatment as defined by the institution's policy and/or ACR guidance * No known or suspected renal impairment; requirements for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prior to MRI as determined by local site standard practice * Weight less than or equal to the MRI table limit * No women who have had prior contrast enhanced mammography (contrast enhanced spectral mammography \[CESM\] or contrast enhanced digital mammography \[CEDM\]) * No women who have breast prosthetic implants (silicone or saline)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by PathologyUp to 1 yearFor each modality, the detection rate of invasive cancers is defined as the proportion of participants who had an invasive cancer detected by the modality at baseline and verified by pathology versus the total number of participants. In the out come measures table below, these proportions will be automatically calculated, multiplied by 100, and be presented as percentages (%).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of BiopsiesBaseline to up to 1 yearTest Positive (T+): Biopsy recommended by imaging, defined as patients with at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 on image interpretation. Reference Standard Positive (RS+): Pathologically confirmed DCIS or invasive disease resultant from a positive test. The 95% confidence interval for PPV of biopsy for each modality were derived from the GEE model using the appropriate estimable contrasts with robust standard errors
Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MRBaselineFor DBT: DBT: Call back is defined as having additional views or targeted ultrasound to evaluate DBT findings DBT: short term follow up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on DBT DBT: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having either call back or STFU For AB-MR: Ab-MR: Call back does not apply to AB-MR and will not be evaluated Ab-MR: Short Term Follow-up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on AB-MR Ab-MR: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having a STFU
Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity)Baseline to up to 1 yearReference standard positive (RS+): breast cancer (invasive or DCIS) detected on the year 0 screening or reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screening. Reference standard negative (RS-): No breast cancer reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screen. Incomplete: No Year 1 imaging, and \<11 months of patient follow-up (\<330 days) after year 0 screen Positive Test (T+) is defined as the imaging modality result is positive (BI-RADS 3-5), and the location of the finding is matches the location of the cancer indicated by the reference standard. Negative Test (T-) will be estimated as the fraction of reference standard negative subjects for whom the imaging modality result was negative (BI-RADS 1-2). 95% confidence intervals for the sensitivity and specificity of each modality calculated using the Wilson method.
Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic TestingBaseline to up to 1 yearTesting Morbidities Index (TMI) scores \[0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale\] will be computed for abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) after the baseline screen.
Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Up to 1 yearThe proportions of participants willing to return for screening with either test, AB-MRI only, DBT only, or not willing to return for either test will be estimated.
Factors Associated With Willingness to Return for ScreeningUp to 1 yearPolytomous logistic regression will be used to examine factors associated with willingness to return, including screen result, cancer status, and demographic characteristics.
Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityUp to 1 yearDescriptive Analyses presenting the the distributions of Oncotype-DCIS scores by modality: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected on abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) A low risk score is less than 39, and a high risk score is 55 or higher. A score of 39 to 54 is intermediate risk.
Incident Cancer RateUp to 3 yearsBreast cancer incidence will be estimated. Person-years will be measured.
NanoString Tumor Biologies of Invasive Cancers and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) Detected on AB-MR and DBTend of studyFor all invasive cancers detected during the study period, the NanoString PAM50 will be performed. The frequencies of cancer types determined by the NanoString analysis will be tabulated and compared. For DCIS, if the Oncotype-DCIS score was performed, the distributions of scores will be tabulated and compared. All efforts to obtain NanoString data have been exhausted, therefore we have no data available to report.

Countries

Germany, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristopher Comstock

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Women with dense breasts scheduled for routine screening with DBT were enrolled to receive DBT and AB-MR, with scan order determined by randomization. The first subject was accrued on December 27, 2016, and accrual ended on November 10, 2017. A total of 48 institutions participated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (DBT, AB-MR)
Participants undergo DBT followed by AB-MR, for under 10 minutes, on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. AB-MR: Contrast-enhanced Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) DBT: Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography
757
Arm B (AB-MR, DBT)
Participants undergo AB-MR, for under 10 minutes, followed by DBT on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. AB-MR: Contrast-enhanced Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) DBT: Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography
759
Total1,516

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalArm B (AB-MR, DBT)Arm A (DBT, AB-MR)
Age, Continuous54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Breast density (baseline DBT)
Almost entirely fat
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Breast density (baseline DBT)
Extremely dense
222 Participants109 Participants113 Participants
Breast density (baseline DBT)
Heterogeneously dense
1128 Participants564 Participants564 Participants
Breast density (baseline DBT)
Scan not performed
48 Participants19 Participants29 Participants
Breast density (baseline DBT)
Scattered fibroglandular densities
116 Participants66 Participants50 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants31 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1382 Participants678 Participants704 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
92 Participants50 Participants42 Participants
Menopausal Status
Naturally post-menopausal
671 Participants355 Participants316 Participants
Menopausal Status
Peri-menopausal
94 Participants45 Participants49 Participants
Menopausal Status
Pre-menopausal
442 Participants206 Participants236 Participants
Menopausal Status
Surgically post-menopausal
243 Participants129 Participants114 Participants
Menopausal Status
Unknown (data not available)
66 Participants24 Participants42 Participants
Prior personal history of breast cancer
No
1452 Participants728 Participants724 Participants
Prior personal history of breast cancer
Unknown
55 Participants25 Participants30 Participants
Prior personal history of breast cancer
Yes
9 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
60 Participants22 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
70 Participants41 Participants29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
94 Participants53 Participants41 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1287 Participants639 Participants648 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
1516 Participants759 Participants757 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 1,444
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 1,444
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 1,444

Outcome results

Primary

Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by Pathology

For each modality, the detection rate of invasive cancers is defined as the proportion of participants who had an invasive cancer detected by the modality at baseline and verified by pathology versus the total number of participants. In the out come measures table below, these proportions will be automatically calculated, multiplied by 100, and be presented as percentages (%).

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: Subjects with both DBT and AB-MR

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by PathologyNo Invasive Cancer Detected1437 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by PathologyInvasive Cancer Detected7 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by PathologyNo Invasive Cancer Detected1427 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by PathologyInvasive Cancer Detected17 Participants
Comparison: The proportion of participants who had an invasive cancer, verified by pathology, detected by each modality (the invasive cancer detection rates) will be made using exact McNemar's test.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.0022, 0.0116]McNemar
Secondary

Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MR

For DBT: DBT: Call back is defined as having additional views or targeted ultrasound to evaluate DBT findings DBT: short term follow up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on DBT DBT: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having either call back or STFU For AB-MR: Ab-MR: Call back does not apply to AB-MR and will not be evaluated Ab-MR: Short Term Follow-up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on AB-MR Ab-MR: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having a STFU

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MRCall back146 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MRShort-term follow-up (subject-level)18 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MRAdditional imaging recommendation146 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MRCall backNA Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MRShort-term follow-up (subject-level)108 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MRAdditional imaging recommendation108 Participants
Comparison: The exact p-value from McNemar's test is reported for for comparing the DBT against the AB-MR short term follow-up ratesp-value: <0.0001McNemar
Comparison: The exact p-value from McNemar's test is reported for for comparing the DBT against the AB-MR additional imaging ratesp-value: 0.02McNemar
Secondary

Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic Testing

Testing Morbidities Index (TMI) scores \[0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale\] will be computed for abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) after the baseline screen.

Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 year

Population: Participants with both DBT and MRI performed and completed PRO surveys

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic TestingTMI component during exam90.1 score on 0-100 scale
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic TestingTMI component after exam98.4 score on 0-100 scale
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic TestingTMI component during exam86.3 score on 0-100 scale
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic TestingTMI component after exam99.0 score on 0-100 scale
Secondary

Factors Associated With Willingness to Return for Screening

Polytomous logistic regression will be used to examine factors associated with willingness to return, including screen result, cancer status, and demographic characteristics.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Secondary

Incident Cancer Rate

Breast cancer incidence will be estimated. Person-years will be measured.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: All eligible subjects who received both Ab-MR and DBT at year 0 and year 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Incident Cancer RateYear 1 Screen to 12 mo post screening7.89 cancers per 1,000 person-years
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Incident Cancer Rate12 months to 24 months post study screening3.19 cancers per 1,000 person-years
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Incident Cancer Rate24 months to 36 months study screening5.00 cancers per 1,000 person-years
Secondary

NanoString Tumor Biologies of Invasive Cancers and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) Detected on AB-MR and DBT

For all invasive cancers detected during the study period, the NanoString PAM50 will be performed. The frequencies of cancer types determined by the NanoString analysis will be tabulated and compared. For DCIS, if the Oncotype-DCIS score was performed, the distributions of scores will be tabulated and compared. All efforts to obtain NanoString data have been exhausted, therefore we have no data available to report.

Time frame: end of study

Population: NanoString data were not collected

Secondary

Oncotype-DCIS Scores by Modality

Descriptive Analyses presenting the the distributions of Oncotype-DCIS scores by modality: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected on abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) A low risk score is less than 39, and a high risk score is 55 or higher. A score of 39 to 54 is intermediate risk.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: All subjects with DCIS detected either by AbMRI or DBT received Oncotype DX assessment

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityTissue not available/not submitted4 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityHigh risk (>54)0 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityLow (<39)1 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityIntermediate (39-54)0 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityDCIS not detected by Modality5 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityDCIS not detected by Modality4 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityIntermediate (39-54)1 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityHigh risk (>54)0 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityTissue not available/not submitted3 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Oncotype-DCIS Scores by ModalityLow (<39)2 Participants
Secondary

Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Biopsies

Test Positive (T+): Biopsy recommended by imaging, defined as patients with at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 on image interpretation. Reference Standard Positive (RS+): Pathologically confirmed DCIS or invasive disease resultant from a positive test. The 95% confidence interval for PPV of biopsy for each modality were derived from the GEE model using the appropriate estimable contrasts with robust standard errors

Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 year

Population: Positive predictive value is calculated on patients with at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 on image interpretation (I.e., Biopsy recommended) and is the percentage of biopsy recommended by imaging test versus patients with cancer P(D+\|T+)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Biopsies31.0 percentage of Biopsy Recommended
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Biopsies19.6 percentage of Biopsy Recommended
Comparison: Positive Predictive Value (PPV)p-value: 0.15Leisenring
Secondary

Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity)

Reference standard positive (RS+): breast cancer (invasive or DCIS) detected on the year 0 screening or reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screening. Reference standard negative (RS-): No breast cancer reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screen. Incomplete: No Year 1 imaging, and \<11 months of patient follow-up (\<330 days) after year 0 screen Positive Test (T+) is defined as the imaging modality result is positive (BI-RADS 3-5), and the location of the finding is matches the location of the cancer indicated by the reference standard. Negative Test (T-) will be estimated as the fraction of reference standard negative subjects for whom the imaging modality result was negative (BI-RADS 1-2). 95% confidence intervals for the sensitivity and specificity of each modality calculated using the Wilson method.

Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 year

Population: of the 1444 women available for analysis 14 were missing reference standard information.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity)Sensitivity (T+|RS+)39.1 percentage of correct classifications
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity)Specificity (T-|RS-)97.4 percentage of correct classifications
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity)Sensitivity (T+|RS+)95.7 percentage of correct classifications
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity)Specificity (T-|RS-)86.7 percentage of correct classifications
p-value: 0.001McNemar
p-value: <0.001McNemar
Secondary

Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)

The proportions of participants willing to return for screening with either test, AB-MRI only, DBT only, or not willing to return for either test will be estimated.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: Subjects with AB-MR, DBT and completed surveys

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every four Years13 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every two years147 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Never Again13 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every three years34 Participants
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every year1107 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every three years13 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every four Years5 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Never Again8 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every two years66 Participants
Abbreviated Breast MR (AB-MR)Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every year1221 Participants
Ab-MRI Future Screen if AB-MRI Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every three years7 Participants
Ab-MRI Future Screen if AB-MRI Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every year1237 Participants
Ab-MRI Future Screen if AB-MRI Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every two years64 Participants
Ab-MRI Future Screen if AB-MRI Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every four Years4 Participants
Ab-MRI Future Screen if AB-MRI Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Never Again7 Participants
DBT Future Screen if DBT Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every four Years4 Participants
DBT Future Screen if DBT Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every two years35 Participants
DBT Future Screen if DBT Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every year1271 Participants
DBT Future Screen if DBT Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Screen every three years3 Participants
DBT Future Screen if DBT Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or UltrasoundWillingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT)Never Again5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026