Skip to content

PROSTVAC in Combination With Nivolumab in Men With Prostate Cancer

Phase I/II Study of PROSTVAC in Combination With Nivolumab in Men With Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02933255
Enrollment
24
Registered
2016-10-14
Start date
2017-04-18
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2024-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Safety, Neoadjuvant, Prostatectomy, Immunotherapy, Vaccine

Brief summary

Background: The immune system is the cells and organs in the body that recognize and fight infection and cancer. The prostate specific antigen (PSA)/TRICOM (PROSTVAC) vaccine might teach the immune system to find and kill certain prostate cancer cells. Nivolumab is a drug that allows the immune system to fight tumors. It might help PROSTVAC work better. Objective: To test the safety and effectiveness of the combination of PROSTVAC and nivolumab. To test this for people with castration resistant prostate cancer and then for other people with localized prostate cancer who are candidates for surgical removal of the prostate. Eligibility: Men ages 18 and older with prostate cancer Design: Participants will be screened with: Medical history Physical exam Blood and urine tests Electrocardiogram Bone scan Computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Tumor sample. This may be from a previous procedure. All participants will get a combination of the study drugs over 8 weeks. They will have 1 visit for the initial injection then 3 booster injection / nivolumab infusion visits. Blood will be tested at these visits. Over the next 4 weeks, some participants will have: An exam of the large intestine through the rectum. CT and bone scans Standard hormonal treatment Option to continue treatment every 3 weeks if their disease does not get worse. They will have scans every 12 weeks. Other participants will have surgery to remove the prostate in week 9. Participants will have a safety visit about a month after their last treatment. This will include a physical exam, blood tests, and possibly scans. If their cancer progresses, participants will leave the study and may enroll in a long-term follow-up study. They will be contacted once a year to ask about their cancer and treatment.

Detailed description

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors interfere with the immune systems autoregulatory mechanisms, allowing for a potentially expanded and prolonged T-cell response with the possibility of greater antitumor effects. Nivolumab is a fully human Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody that targets the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) protein. Specifically, the antibody binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PD-L2), thereby releasing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, including anti-tumor immune response. PROSTVAC (developed by the National Cancer Institute \[NCI\] and licensed to Bavarian Nordic Immunotherapeutics, Mountain View, California (CA) is a therapeutic cancer vaccine for prostate cancer. Early studies have demonstrated immunologic efficacy and suggested clinical benefit. A phase III trial has completed accrual. A previous study combining the immune checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab and PROSTVAC suggested greater efficacy than PROSTVAC alone. Additional studies have demonstrated the potential efficacy of immunologic combination therapy with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. This study will aim to evaluate the impact of the combination of PROSTVAC and the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab on the tumor microenvironment focusing on immune cell infiltration as the primary endpoint. United States (US)-MRI imaging technology will be employed to sample the tumor before treatment and after radical prostatectomy. The findings from this study could serve as the basis for future studies with this combination in this population of participants and more advanced disease. Objectives: Safety (For castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) lead-in cohort) Evaluate changes in T-cell infiltration in the tumor after neoadjuvant treatment with PROSTVAC and nivolumab, relative to changes seen in a phase 2 trial with PROSTVAC alone in the neoadjuvant setting- NCT02153918 (For the neoadjuvant cohort). Eligibility: Participants must have histopathological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the prostate prior to starting this study and evaluable biopsy tissue (e.g., unstained slides or blocks) available for analysis. For the castration resistant lead in cohort, if histopathological documentation is unavailable, a rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) and a clinical course consistent with prostate cancer would be acceptable. Participants must have a performance status of 0 to 1 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) criteria. Hematological eligibility parameters (within 16 days of starting therapy): Granulocyte count 1,500/mm\^3 Platelet count 100,000/mm\^3 Hemoglobin (Hgb) \>= 8 g/dL Biochemical eligibility parameters (within 16 days of starting therapy): Hepatic function: Bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dl (OR in participants with Gilbert's syndrome, total bilirubin \<= 3.0 mg/dL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) \<= 2.5 times upper limit of normal. Creatinine \<= 1.5 X ULN Design: The primary focus of this study will be to evaluate PROSTVAC and nivolumab in the neoadjuvant setting. Lead-in cohort evaluating the safety and tolerability of this combination in the castration resistant setting (CRPC cohort) Following this lead-in cohort in the CRPC setting, we will enroll a cohort in the neoadjuvant setting evaluating the combination of PROSTVAC and nivolumab. The lead-in safety cohort will require 10 participants and the neoadjuvant cohort will require 17 evaluable participants. In order to allow for a small number of inevaluable participants, the accrual ceiling will be set to 29 participants.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPROSTVAC-V/F

PROSTVAC-V (vaccinia) will be administered subcutaneously in an extremity (e.g., thigh) at a dose of 2x10\^8 infectious units. PROSTVAC-F (fowlpox) will be administered subcutaneously in an extremity (e.g., thigh) at a dose of 1x10\^9 infectious units.

DRUGNivolumab

Nivolumab is to be administered as a flat dose over approximately 30-minutes via intravenous (IV) infusion.

PROCEDUREProstatectomy

Participants in the neoadjuvant cohort will undergo a radical prostatectomy in week 9. (If surgery is scheduled earlier than 9 weeks after initial dosing, the 6 and 8 week dosing may be skipped, and surgery may be done as early as week 5.)

PROCEDUREBiopsy

A baseline biopsy is performed for participants in the neoadjuvant cohort that do not have a previous collection of biopsy material.

Participants who experience aches or fever after vaccination may take Tylenol as directed.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: For the neoadjuvant cohort, patients must have histopathological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the prostate prior to starting this study and evaluable biopsy tissue (e.g., unstained slides or blocks) available for analysis. If evaluable tissue is not available, the patient must agree to undergo a pre-vaccination prostate biopsy on study. For the castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) lead in cohort, if histopathological documentation is unavailable, a rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) and a clinical course consistent with prostate cancer would be acceptable. * Age greater than or equal to 18 years. Because no dosing or adverse event data are currently available on the use of PROSTVAC in combination with nivolumab, ipilimumab or both in participants \<18 years of age, children are excluded from this study, but will be eligible for future pediatric trials. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. * Participants must not have other active invasive malignancies within the past 2 years (with the exception, of non-melanoma skin cancers) (for CRPC cohort only). * Participants must be willing to travel to the study site for follow-up visits * All participants who have received prior vaccination with vaccinia virus (for smallpox immunization) must not have a history of serious adverse reaction to the vaccine. * The effects of PROSTVAC in combination nivolumab, ipilimumab or both on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, men must agree to use adequate contraception (abstinence, vasectomy) or female partner must use (intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal \[birth control, pills, injections, or implants\], tubal ligation\] prior to study entry and for up to 7 months after the last dose. * Participants must understand and sign informed consent that explains the neoplastic nature of their disease, the procedures to be followed, the experimental nature of the treatment, alternative treatments, potential risks and toxicities, and the voluntary nature of participation. * Participants must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below: * hemoglobin greater than or equal to 8 g/dL * granulocytes greater than or equal to 1,500/mcL * platelets greater than or equal to 100,000/mcL * total bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dL (or less than or equal to 3.0 mg/dL in patients with Gilbert syndrome) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT)(SGOT)/alanine transaminase (ALT)serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) less than or equal to 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal * creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 X ULN * For the lead in cohort: * Castrate testosterone level (\<50ng/dl or 1.7nmol /L) * Progressive disease at study entry defined as one or more of the following criteria occurring in the setting of castrate levels of testosterone: * Radiographic progression defined as any new or enlarging bone lesions or growing lymph node disease, consistent with prostate cancer OR * PSA progression defined by sequence of rising values separated by \>1 week (2 separate increasing values over a minimum of 2ng/ml (Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) PSA eligibility criteria). If participants had been on flutamide, PSA progression is documented 4 weeks or more after withdrawal. For patients on bicalutamide or nilutamide disease progression is documented 6 or more weeks after withdrawal. * Participants must agree to continuation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist or bilateral orchiectomy * For all neoadjuvant cohorts: * Participants must be a surgical candidate for radical prostatectomy based on standard workup of PSA, biopsy results, and if necessary supplemental imaging. * Participants must have chosen radical prostatectomy as their definitive treatment of choice for management of their prostate cancer. * No systemic steroid or steroid eye drop use within 2 weeks prior to initiation of experimental therapy. Limited doses of systemic steroids to prevent intravenous (IV) contrast, allergic reaction or anaphylaxis (in patients who have known contrast allergies) are allowed.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior splenectomy. * The recombinant vaccinia vaccine should not be administered if the following apply to either recipients or, for at least 3 weeks after vaccination, their close household contacts (Close household contacts are those who share housing or have close physical contact): * persons with active or a history of eczema or other eczematoid skin disorders * those with other acute, chronic or exfoliative skin conditions (e.g., atopic dermatitis, burns, impetigo, varicella zoster, severe acne or other open rashes or wounds) until condition resolves * pregnant or nursing women; children under 3 years of age * Participants should have no evidence, as listed below, of being immunocompromised: * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity due to the potential for decreased tolerance and risk for severe side effects. * Hepatitis B or C positivity. * Concurrent use of systemic steroids or steroid eye drops. This is to avoid immunosuppression which may lead to potential complications with vaccinia (priming vaccination). Nasal, topical, or inhaled steroid use is permitted. * Participants with known allergy to eggs or to compounds with a similar chemical or biologic composition to PROSTVAC, ipilimumab or nivolumab. * No prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4), anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) are allowed. * Other serious intercurrent illness. * Participants with a history of unstable or newly diagnosed angina pectoris, recent myocardial infarction (within 6 months of enrollment) or New York Heart Association class II-IV congestive heart failure. * Participants with significant autoimmune disease that is active or potentially life threatening if activated. * Participants with clinically significant cardiomyopathy requiring treatment. * Participants with ongoing toxicities related to prior therapies targeting T cell coregulatory proteins (immune checkpoints) such as anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-CTLA-4 antibody are excluded * No transfusion of blood or blood products within 2 weeks and no granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) within 2 weeks prior to initiations of experimental therapy. * Contraindication to biopsy or prostatectomy (for sequential neoadjuvant cohorts only): * Bleeding disorders * Artificial heart valve * Prothrombin time (PT)/partial thromboplastin time (PTT) greater than or equal to 1.5 in participants not taking anticoagulation. Participants on anticoagulation (e.g., enoxaparin, oral anticoagulants) are eligible regardless of PT/PTT. Prior to biopsy, anticoagulation will be held per standard practice. * For participants with localized prostate cancer contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): * Participants weighing \>136 kilograms (weight limit for the scanner tables) * Allergy to magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent * Participants with pacemakers, cerebral aneurysm clips, shrapnel injury or implantable electronic devices * History of radiation proctitis (for lead-in CRPC cohort only)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)From baseline to radical prostatectomy (approximately week 9)Changes in T-cell infiltration in the tumor after neoadjuvant treatment with PROSTVAC and nivolumab, is defined as difference in density of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8 T) cells and clusters of differentiation 4 (CD4 T) cells infiltrate from baseline to post-treatment (radical prostatectomy performed at week 9), calculated utilizing computer automated staining analysis. The analysis was done per tissue compartment (normal region, intra-tumoral and invasive margin). We hypothesized an increase in T cell infiltration after treatment. Statistically significant changes in T-cell infiltration are those with p\<0.05; to 0.05. The changes are not statistically significant.
Number of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)From treatment start throughout study completion, an average of 1.4 years.Clinically important immune-related adverse events were defined as grade 3 or above inflammation requiring steroids or anti cytokine therapy or not resolving to grade 1 or less within 28 days. These immune-related adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). Grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening, and grade 5 is death related to adverse event.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SeraWeek 4, week 10, and week 20 after therapy compared to baselineChanges in soluble immune mediating factors were defined as differences in sCD27 concentration between pre- and post-treatment samples and were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Mesoscale Assay. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. We hypothesized an increase in sCD27 after treatment. Statistically significant changes in soluble analyzes are those with p\<0.05; to 0.05 means no statistically significant changes.
Changes in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraWeek 4, week 10, and week 20 after therapy compared to baselineChanges in soluble immune mediating factors were defined as differences in TNFα, and IL-10 concentration between pre- and post-treatment samples and were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Mesoscale Assay. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. We hypothesized an increase in TNFα and IL-10 after treatment. Statistically significant changes in soluble analyzes are those with p\<0.05, p0.05 means the changes are not statistically significant.
Percent Change of Tumor Cells Expressing Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PDL-1) (for the Neo-adjuvant Cohort)Baseline (biopsy before first PROSTVAC administration) and at time of radical prostatectomy (on week 9)Changes in PD-L1 expression is defined as changes in density of cells positive for PDL1 and was analyzed by immunohistochemistry staining using the clone 22C3. Placenta tissue was used as a positive control. Previous studies have shown that high PDL1 expression is associated with poor clinical outcomes in prostate cancer participants. An increase of PDL1 after immunotherapy could indicate a resistance of the tumor to the treatment. Values can go from 0 to 100. 50% of Tumor cells is considered positive for PDL1. The sample will be considered positive if at least 1% or tumor cells express PDL1.
Changes in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodWeek 4 and week 10 after therapy compared to baseline.Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and after treatment start via apheresis and cryopreserved peripheral blood mononucleate cells (PBMCs) were analyzed through multicolor flow cytometry to assess cell subsets, i.e. cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) T cells, cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) T cells, Tregs, B cells, Natural Killer (NK) cells, NK-T cells, conventional Dendritic Cells (cDCs), plasmocytoid DCs (pDCs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and monocytes and refined subsets related to their maturation/function. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Statistically significant changes in immune cell subsets are defined as those with p\<0.05 and \>50% of participants having a \>25% change in a given subset.
Changes in Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) LevelsAt baseline and at week 9Blood samples will be collected at baseline and after treatment, and aliquoted onto slides and examined, cytokeratin-positive/lymphocyte common antigen (CD45)-negative cells with an intact nucleus and a malignancy-consistent morphology will be identified as CTCs, and their exact positions on the slides recorded.
Number of Participants With a Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)From baseline and time of radical prostatectomy (average of week 9)Complete pathologic response is defined as the absence of detectable malignant cells in the prostatectomy specimen evaluated by standard histologic techniques.
Rate of Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)From time of prostatectomy through study completion, an average of 10 weeksBiochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy is defined as at least two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values that are 0.2 ng/mL or higher.
Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)From baseline to closest date to prostatectomy, average on week 9.MRI of the prostate was performed to assess for changes in imaging characteristics of prostate cancer pre and post vaccination. MRI changes secondary to immune treatment is defined as increase or decrease in the size of lesions from baseline (pre-vaccine) measurements. Decrease from baseline to after treatment would represent a positive outcome.
Changes in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Mapping, Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)From baseline to closest date to prostatectomy, average on week 9.Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indicator of tumor cell density. This outcome aims to capture any changes in ADC within the prostate tissue before and after the treatment administration. ADC changes secondary to immune treatment are defined as increase or decrease in ADC from baseline (pre-treatment) measurements. Low ADC values in tumors reflect areas of cell proliferation, and high ADC values reflects necrotic and acellular areas.
Intraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)Baseline and at time of prostatectomy (approximately week 9)Intraprostatic Treg cell infiltration was measured by computer automated staining analysis pre and post treatment. Quantification will be reported as number of stained cells per mm\^2 of tissue.
Number of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune TreatmentWeeks 7-10 and 17-22 compared to baselineThe number of participants who developed positive PSA-Specific T cell responses secondary to immune treatment will be reported. Peripheral prostatic specific antigen (PSA)-specific T cells at baseline and after therapy were assessed. PSA-specific T cells were those producing cytokine (Interferon gamma (IFNγ), Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα), Interleukin-2 (IL-2) or positive for the degranulation marker cluster of differentiation 107a (CD107a) following in vitro stimulation with PSA-15-mer peptides compared to a negative control peptide pool, measured by intracellular cytokine staining. A positive response will be defined as a \>2-fold increase in PSA-specific T cells after therapy compared to baseline.
Best Overall Response for Participants With Measurable Disease (Only in the Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Cohort)Baseline throughout study completion (average 1.4 years)The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/ recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started) measured by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study.
Number of Participants With Serologic ResponseFrom baseline throughout study completion, an average of 1.4 years.Best serologic response secondary to immune treatment was reported. Change in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) was used to identify serological responses among participants in the lead-in cohort. Complete Serological Response was defined as PSA level less than 0.2 ng/mL measured for 2 consecutive measurements at least 4 weeks apart. Partial Serological Response was defined as decline of PSA at least 50% measured for 2 consecutive measurements at least 4 weeks apart. Serological Progression: Serological progression will only be measured once PSA has risen above 4 ng/mL and this value must be 50% above the PSA level before commencing treatment. Increase in PSA more than 50% of nadir (lowest PSA on treatment). Values must be measured for 2 consecutive measurements at least 2 weeks apart. The date of the first increase will be recorded as progression. Stable disease: not meeting progressive disease (PD) criteria for ≥12 weeks from treatment start.
Number of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)From baseline throughout study completion, an average of 20 weeks.Clinically important immune-related adverse events were defined as grade 3 or above inflammation requiring steroids or anti cytokine therapy or not resolving to grade 1 or less within 28 days. These immune-related adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). Grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening, and grade 5 is death related to adverse events.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)First study intervention, Study Day 1, to 30 days after participant received last study drug administration. Approximately 1.4 years for the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer cohort, and an average of 20 weeks for the neoadjuvant cohort.Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Cohort
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-TRICOM vaccinia (PROSTVAC)-V on week 0 followed by booster injection called PROSTVAC-F on week 2, 4, and 8. Nivolumab will be administered on week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. When administered on the same day, the preferred order of administration is PROSTVAC first followed by nivolumab. Participants will undergo restaging scans on week 12. If no progressive disease (PD), option to continue treatment with nivolumab every 2 weeks and PROSTVAC-F every 4 weeks until intolerance or progression. Option to extend nivolumab interval to 4 weeks for participants who remain on protocol beyond 1 year. PROSTVAC-V/F: PROSTVAC-V (vaccinia) will be administered subcutaneously in an extremity (e.g., thigh) at a dose of 2x10\^8 infectious units. PROSTVAC-F (fowlpox) will be administered subcutaneously in an extremity (e.g., thigh) at a dose of 1x10\^9 infectious units. Nivolumab: Nivolumab is to be administered as a flat dose over approximately 30-minutes via intravenous (IV) infusion.
12
Neoadjuvant Cohort
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-TRICOM vaccinia (PROSTVAC)-V on week 0 followed by booster injection called PROSTVAC-fowlpox (F) on 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Nivolumab will be administered on week 2, 4, and 8. When administered on the same day, the preferred order of administration is PROSTVAC first followed by nivolumab. Participants will undergo prostatectomy on week 9. PROSTVAC-V/F: PROSTVAC-V (vaccinia) will be administered subcutaneously in an extremity (e.g., thigh) at a dose of 2x10\^8 infectious units. PROSTVAC-F (fowlpox) will be administered subcutaneously in an extremity (e.g., thigh) at a dose of 1x10\^9 infectious units. Nivolumab: Nivolumab is to be administered as a flat dose over approximately 30-minutes via intravenous (IV) infusion.
12
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDiscontinued due to study closure.10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNeoadjuvant CohortTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous71.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.42
60.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.53
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.71
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants12 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1212 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 123 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)

Changes in T-cell infiltration in the tumor after neoadjuvant treatment with PROSTVAC and nivolumab, is defined as difference in density of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8 T) cells and clusters of differentiation 4 (CD4 T) cells infiltrate from baseline to post-treatment (radical prostatectomy performed at week 9), calculated utilizing computer automated staining analysis. The analysis was done per tissue compartment (normal region, intra-tumoral and invasive margin). We hypothesized an increase in T cell infiltration after treatment. Statistically significant changes in T-cell infiltration are those with p\<0.05; to 0.05. The changes are not statistically significant.

Time frame: From baseline to radical prostatectomy (approximately week 9)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the total tissue at baseline64.02 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the total tissue at prostatectomy at week 9154.3 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the center of the tumor at baseline57.9 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the center of the tumor at prostatectomy at week 9110.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the invasive margin at baseline56.4 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the invasive margin at prostatectomy at week 9304 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the normal region at baseline99.15 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD8+ T cell in the normal region at prostatectomy at week 9124.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell helper in the total tissue at baseline114.4 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell helper in the total tissue at prostatectomy at week 9478.8 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell helper in the center of the tumor at baseline109.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell in the center of the tumor at prostatectomy at week 9394.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell helper in the invasive margin at baseline161 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell helper in the invasive margin at prostatectomy at 9 weeks672.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell helper in the normal region at baseline57.4 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in T-cell Infiltration in the Tumor After Neoadjuvant Treatment (Only for the Neoadjuvant Cohort)CD4+ T cell helper in the normal region at prostatectomy at week 9246.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.04Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.46Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.016Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.38Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)

Clinically important immune-related adverse events were defined as grade 3 or above inflammation requiring steroids or anti cytokine therapy or not resolving to grade 1 or less within 28 days. These immune-related adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). Grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening, and grade 5 is death related to adverse event.

Time frame: From treatment start throughout study completion, an average of 1.4 years.

Population: \*2 out of 7 immune related adverse events (irAEs) occurred during administration of both ipilimumab and nivolumab, before a protocol amendment was performed and eliminated ipilimumab from the study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 3 irAE colitis1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 3 irAE hemorrhagic cystitis1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 3 irAE hepatitis (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase)1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 3 irAE maculopapular rash1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 3 irAE mucositis oral1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 4 autoimmune diabetes (hyperglycemia)1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 4 irAE myositis (CPK increase)1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 4 irAE hepatitis (alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase)1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (for the Lead-In Cohort)Grade 5 irAE0 Participants
Secondary

Best Overall Response for Participants With Measurable Disease (Only in the Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Cohort)

The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/ recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started) measured by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study.

Time frame: Baseline throughout study completion (average 1.4 years)

Population: 7/12 participants had measurable disease at baseline and were analyzed for this outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortBest Overall Response for Participants With Measurable Disease (Only in the Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Cohort)Complete Response2 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortBest Overall Response for Participants With Measurable Disease (Only in the Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Cohort)Partial Response0 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortBest Overall Response for Participants With Measurable Disease (Only in the Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Cohort)Stable Disease3 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortBest Overall Response for Participants With Measurable Disease (Only in the Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Cohort)Progressive Disease2 Participants
Secondary

Changes in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Mapping, Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indicator of tumor cell density. This outcome aims to capture any changes in ADC within the prostate tissue before and after the treatment administration. ADC changes secondary to immune treatment are defined as increase or decrease in ADC from baseline (pre-treatment) measurements. Low ADC values in tumors reflect areas of cell proliferation, and high ADC values reflects necrotic and acellular areas.

Time frame: From baseline to closest date to prostatectomy, average on week 9.

Population: 4/12 participants were not analyzed because MRI was not performed due to logistical issues.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Mapping, Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)Mean ADC value for all measurable lesions at baseline1220.6 10^6 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 218.4
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Mapping, Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)Mean ADC value for all measurable lesions after treatment1236.1 10^6 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 244.6
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) Levels

Blood samples will be collected at baseline and after treatment, and aliquoted onto slides and examined, cytokeratin-positive/lymphocyte common antigen (CD45)-negative cells with an intact nucleus and a malignancy-consistent morphology will be identified as CTCs, and their exact positions on the slides recorded.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 9

Population: This analysis was not performed because the technology developed by Epic Sciences was still in development, thus samples were not sent to the off-site center to perform analysis.

Secondary

Changes in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral Blood

Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and after treatment start via apheresis and cryopreserved peripheral blood mononucleate cells (PBMCs) were analyzed through multicolor flow cytometry to assess cell subsets, i.e. cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) T cells, cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) T cells, Tregs, B cells, Natural Killer (NK) cells, NK-T cells, conventional Dendritic Cells (cDCs), plasmocytoid DCs (pDCs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and monocytes and refined subsets related to their maturation/function. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Statistically significant changes in immune cell subsets are defined as those with p\<0.05 and \>50% of participants having a \>25% change in a given subset.

Time frame: Week 4 and week 10 after therapy compared to baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK ki67+ cells Baseline0.7 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg cells week 10 post treatment0.6 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK ki67+ cells week 4 post treatment1 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ki67+ T cells week 4 post treatment1.3 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK ki67+ cells week 10 post treatment0.8 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ T cells week 4 post treatment27.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKG2D+ cells Baseline1 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ki67+ T cells week 10 post treatment0.9 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKG2D+ cells week 4 post treatment1.7 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodcDC cells Baseline0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKG2D+ cells week 10 post treatment1.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+EM ki67+ T cells Baseline0.6 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKp46+ cells Baseline2.5 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ T cells week 10 post treatment10.6 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKp46+ cells week 4 post treatment3.3 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+EM ki67+ T cells week 4 post treatment0.8 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKp46+ cells week 10 post treatment3.1 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodcDC cells week 4 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ naive T cells Baseline3.3 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+EM ki67+ T cells week 10 post treatment0.7 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ naive T cells week 4 post treatment2.6 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ T cells Baseline11.7 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ naive T cells week 10 post treatment2.3 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ ICOS+ T cells Baseline2.6 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ CM T cells Baseline0.3 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodcDC cells week 10 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ CM T cells week 4 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ ICOS+ T cells week 4 post treatment3.8 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ CM T cells week 10 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg cells Baseline0.9 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodgMDSC Baseline0 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ ICOS+ T cells week 10 post treatment2.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodgMDSC week 4 post treatment0 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodMonocytes Baseline6.8 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodgMDSC week 10 post treatment0 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ ki67+ T cells Baseline0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodIntermediate monocytes Baseline0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ T cells week 10 post treatment24.5 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodIntermediate monocytes week 4 post treatment0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ ki67+ T cells week 4 post treatment0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodIntermediate monocytes week 10 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodMonocytes week 4 post treatment7.5 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNon-classical monocytes Baseline0.7 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ ki67+ T cells week 10 post treatment0.3 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNon-classical monocytes week 4 post treatment0.9 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg cells week 4 post treatment1.1 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNon-classical monocytes week 10 post treatment0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg ICOS+ cells Baseline0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ CM T cells Baseline10 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodMonocytes week 10 post treatment6.2 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ CM T cells week 4 post treatment7.5 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg ICOS+ cells week 4 post treatment0.7 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ CM T cells week 10 post treatment7.6 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ T cells week 4 post treatment11 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ naive T cells Baseline9 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg ICOS+ cells week 10 post treatment0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ naive T cells week 4 post treatment8.5 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ki67+ T cells Baseline0.9 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ naive T cells week 10 post treatment8.8 percentage of PBMC's
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ T cells Baseline33.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ naive T cells week 10 post treatment5.7 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ T cells Baseline27 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ T cells week 4 post treatment20.3 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ T cells week 10 post treatment25.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ T cells Baseline10.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ T cells week 4 post treatment9.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ T cells week 10 post treatment10.8 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg cells Baseline0.9 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg cells week 4 post treatment1 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg cells week 10 post treatment0.9 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodcDC cells Baseline0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodcDC cells week 4 post treatment0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodcDC cells week 10 post treatment0.3 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodMonocytes Baseline12.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodMonocytes week 4 post treatment14.6 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodMonocytes week 10 post treatment10.9 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ki67+ T cells Baseline0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ki67+ T cells week 4 post treatment0.6 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ki67+ T cells week 10 post treatment0.6 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+EM ki67+ T cells Baseline0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+EM ki67+ T cells week 4 post treatment0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+EM ki67+ T cells week 10 post treatment0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ ICOS+ T cells Baseline2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ ICOS+ T cells week 4 post treatment2.3 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ ICOS+ T cells week 10 post treatment2.3 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ ki67+ T cells Baseline0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ ki67+ T cells week 4 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ ki67+ T cells week 10 post treatment0.3 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg ICOS+ cells Baseline0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg ICOS+ cells week 4 post treatment0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodTreg ICOS+ cells week 10 post treatment0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK ki67+ cells Baseline0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK ki67+ cells week 4 post treatment0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK ki67+ cells week 10 post treatment0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKG2D+ cells Baseline1.2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKG2D+ cells week 4 post treatment1.6 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKG2D+ cells week 10 post treatment2.3 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKp46+ cells Baseline2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKp46+ cells week 4 post treatment2.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNK NKp46+ cells week 10 post treatment1.8 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ naive T cells Baseline2.2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ naive T cells week 4 post treatment1.7 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ naive T cells week 10 post treatment2.1 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ CM T cells Baseline0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ CM T cells week 4 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD8+ CM T cells week 10 post treatment0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodgMDSC Baseline0 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodgMDSC week 4 post treatment0.2 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodgMDSC week 10 post treatment0.1 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodIntermediate monocytes Baseline0.4 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodIntermediate monocytes week 4 post treatment0.7 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodIntermediate monocytes week 10 post treatment0.5 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNon-classical monocytes Baseline0.8 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNon-classical monocytes week 4 post treatment1.6 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodNon-classical monocytes week 10 post treatment0.9 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ CM T cells Baseline9.3 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ CM T cells week 4 post treatment5.9 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ CM T cells week 10 post treatment9 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ naive T cells Baseline6.7 percentage of PBMC's
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Immune Cell Subsets in the Peripheral BloodCD4+ naive T cells week 4 post treatment4.7 percentage of PBMC's
p-value: 0.339Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.037Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.009Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.844Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.204Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.084Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.042Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.688Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.733Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.519Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.695Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.034Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.301Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.38Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.014Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.791Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.042Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.424Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.77Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.105Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.622Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.313Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.049Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.47Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.313Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.092Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.176Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.232Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.131Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.424Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.438Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.151Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.569Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.105Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.012Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.677Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.424Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.432Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.016Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.733Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.519Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.557Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.034Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.092Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.733Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.922Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.176Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.049Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.563Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.012Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.084Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.016Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.688Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.38Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.021Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.91Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.084Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.151Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.042Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.424Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.846Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.339Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.012Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.622Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.492Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.11Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.02Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.052Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.844Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: >0.999Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.049Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.339Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: >0.999Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)

MRI of the prostate was performed to assess for changes in imaging characteristics of prostate cancer pre and post vaccination. MRI changes secondary to immune treatment is defined as increase or decrease in the size of lesions from baseline (pre-vaccine) measurements. Decrease from baseline to after treatment would represent a positive outcome.

Time frame: From baseline to closest date to prostatectomy, average on week 9.

Population: 4/12 participants were not analyzed because MRI was not performed due to logistical issues.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)Mean largest lesion measurement at baseline16.5 mm
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Secondary to Immune Treatment (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)Mean targeted lesion measurement after treatment17.3 mm
Secondary

Changes in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in Sera

Changes in soluble immune mediating factors were defined as differences in sCD27 concentration between pre- and post-treatment samples and were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Mesoscale Assay. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. We hypothesized an increase in sCD27 after treatment. Statistically significant changes in soluble analyzes are those with p\<0.05; to 0.05 means no statistically significant changes.

Time frame: Week 4, week 10, and week 20 after therapy compared to baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SerasCD27 at baseline98.6 U/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SerasCD27 week 10108.8 U/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SeraSCD27 week 20131.9 U/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SerasCD27 week 4127.9 U/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SeraSCD27 week 2081 U/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SerasCD27 at baseline77.2 U/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SerasCD27 week 480.2 U/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 27 (sCD27) in SerasCD27 week 1082 U/mL
p-value: 0.064Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.004Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.004Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Changes in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in Sera

Changes in soluble immune mediating factors were defined as differences in TNFα, and IL-10 concentration between pre- and post-treatment samples and were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Mesoscale Assay. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. We hypothesized an increase in TNFα and IL-10 after treatment. Statistically significant changes in soluble analyzes are those with p\<0.05, p0.05 means the changes are not statistically significant.

Time frame: Week 4, week 10, and week 20 after therapy compared to baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Baseline2.8 pg/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Week 43.5 pg/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Week 103 pg/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Week 203.4 pg/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Baseline0.3 pg/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Week 40.6 pg/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Week 100.5 pg/mL
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Week 200.5 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Week 200.5 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Baseline2.5 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Baseline0.3 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Week 42.7 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Week 100.4 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Week 102.8 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraIL-10 Week 40.5 pg/mL
Neoadjuvant CohortChanges in Soluble Immune Mediating Factors (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) in SeraTNFα Week 202.4 pg/mL
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.042Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.233Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.052Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.055Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.203Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.034Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.034Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.004Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.129Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Intraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)

Intraprostatic Treg cell infiltration was measured by computer automated staining analysis pre and post treatment. Quantification will be reported as number of stained cells per mm\^2 of tissue.

Time frame: Baseline and at time of prostatectomy (approximately week 9)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the normal region at baseline0 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the total tissue at baseline0.3 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the total tissue at prostatectomy1.3 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the center of the tumor at baseline0 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the center of the tumor at prostatectomy1.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the invasive margin at baseline0 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the invasive margin at prostatectomy3.5 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortIntraprostatic Treg Cell Infiltration With Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) and Forkhead Box P3 (FOX-P3) Staining (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)T regs in the normal region at prostatectomy0 Cell/mm^2 of tissue
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)

Complete pathologic response is defined as the absence of detectable malignant cells in the prostatectomy specimen evaluated by standard histologic techniques.

Time frame: From baseline and time of radical prostatectomy (average of week 9)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With a Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)

Clinically important immune-related adverse events were defined as grade 3 or above inflammation requiring steroids or anti cytokine therapy or not resolving to grade 1 or less within 28 days. These immune-related adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). Grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening, and grade 5 is death related to adverse events.

Time frame: From baseline throughout study completion, an average of 20 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Immune-related Adverse Events (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune Treatment

The number of participants who developed positive PSA-Specific T cell responses secondary to immune treatment will be reported. Peripheral prostatic specific antigen (PSA)-specific T cells at baseline and after therapy were assessed. PSA-specific T cells were those producing cytokine (Interferon gamma (IFNγ), Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα), Interleukin-2 (IL-2) or positive for the degranulation marker cluster of differentiation 107a (CD107a) following in vitro stimulation with PSA-15-mer peptides compared to a negative control peptide pool, measured by intracellular cytokine staining. A positive response will be defined as a \>2-fold increase in PSA-specific T cells after therapy compared to baseline.

Time frame: Weeks 7-10 and 17-22 compared to baseline

Population: 1/12 were not analyzed in the lead-in cohort because there was an insufficient number of viable peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to perform the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune TreatmentParticipants with PSA-specific T cells at baseline2 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune TreatmentParticipants with positive PSA-specific Tcell response 7-10weeks post treatment compared to baseline7 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune TreatmentParticipants with positive PSAspecific Tcell response 17-22weeks post treatment compared to baseline4 Participants
Neoadjuvant CohortNumber of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune TreatmentParticipants with PSA-specific T cells at baseline6 Participants
Neoadjuvant CohortNumber of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune TreatmentParticipants with positive PSA-specific Tcell response 7-10weeks post treatment compared to baseline3 Participants
Neoadjuvant CohortNumber of Participants With Peripheral Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Specific T Secondary To Immune TreatmentParticipants with positive PSAspecific Tcell response 17-22weeks post treatment compared to baseline5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serologic Response

Best serologic response secondary to immune treatment was reported. Change in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) was used to identify serological responses among participants in the lead-in cohort. Complete Serological Response was defined as PSA level less than 0.2 ng/mL measured for 2 consecutive measurements at least 4 weeks apart. Partial Serological Response was defined as decline of PSA at least 50% measured for 2 consecutive measurements at least 4 weeks apart. Serological Progression: Serological progression will only be measured once PSA has risen above 4 ng/mL and this value must be 50% above the PSA level before commencing treatment. Increase in PSA more than 50% of nadir (lowest PSA on treatment). Values must be measured for 2 consecutive measurements at least 2 weeks apart. The date of the first increase will be recorded as progression. Stable disease: not meeting progressive disease (PD) criteria for ≥12 weeks from treatment start.

Time frame: From baseline throughout study completion, an average of 1.4 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Serologic ResponseComplete Serological Response1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Serologic ResponsePartial Serological Response1 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Serologic ResponseSerological Progressive Disease4 Participants
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Serologic ResponseSerological Stable Disease6 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change of Tumor Cells Expressing Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PDL-1) (for the Neo-adjuvant Cohort)

Changes in PD-L1 expression is defined as changes in density of cells positive for PDL1 and was analyzed by immunohistochemistry staining using the clone 22C3. Placenta tissue was used as a positive control. Previous studies have shown that high PDL1 expression is associated with poor clinical outcomes in prostate cancer participants. An increase of PDL1 after immunotherapy could indicate a resistance of the tumor to the treatment. Values can go from 0 to 100. 50% of Tumor cells is considered positive for PDL1. The sample will be considered positive if at least 1% or tumor cells express PDL1.

Time frame: Baseline (biopsy before first PROSTVAC administration) and at time of radical prostatectomy (on week 9)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortPercent Change of Tumor Cells Expressing Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PDL-1) (for the Neo-adjuvant Cohort)Baseline0 Percent change in cell/mm^2 of tissueStandard Deviation 0
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortPercent Change of Tumor Cells Expressing Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PDL-1) (for the Neo-adjuvant Cohort)Time of prostatectomy (week 9)0.07 Percent change in cell/mm^2 of tissueStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

Rate of Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)

Biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy is defined as at least two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values that are 0.2 ng/mL or higher.

Time frame: From time of prostatectomy through study completion, an average of 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortRate of Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)0 Participants
Neoadjuvant CohortRate of Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy (Only for Neoadjuvant Cohort)0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

Time frame: First study intervention, Study Day 1, to 30 days after participant received last study drug administration. Approximately 1.4 years for the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer cohort, and an average of 20 weeks for the neoadjuvant cohort.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lead-in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) CohortNumber of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)12 Participants
Neoadjuvant CohortNumber of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)12 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026