HIV, Men
Conditions
Keywords
HIV, Black/African American, Men, Gay/bisexual, Los Angeles
Brief summary
The proposed research study will focus on Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) who * are HIV- or unknown status AND * have not received HIV testing in over a year or * who test irregularly (on 9/21/2016, the protocol was changed to modify the last to criteria and focus on those who have not used PrEP in the prior six months). and implement an innovative, culturally-informed, peer-based, and client-centered approach that is designed to increase their awareness of their HIV status and their timely entry into prevention (including PrEP), testing, care, and treatment services. The research design compares the effect of an incentives-only approach to one that uses incentives, along with the involvement of peer mentors to support timely entry into prevention, testing, care and treatment. This phase of the study is designed to assess peer-supported intervention group versus a passport/incentive-only control group over an 18-month period using a randomized trial approach.
Detailed description
The proposed research study focuses on BMSM who have not received HIV testing in over a year, or who test irregularly, and implement an innovative, culturally-informed, peer-based, and client-centered approach that is designed to increase their awareness of their HIV status and their timely entry into prevention, care, and treatment services. On 9/21/2016, the protocol was changed to focus on those who have not used PrEP in the prior six months. The research design compares the effect of an incentives-only approach to one that uses incentives, along with the involvement of peer mentors to support timely entry into prevention, testing, care and treatment. This phase of the study is designed to assess peer-supported intervention group versus a passport/incentive-only control group over an 18-month period using a randomized trial approach. The Specific Aims of the full intervention phase are: 2 (Modified). To assess the effectiveness of a peer-supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (PtW) compared to a non-peer supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (Control) for linking at-risk BMSM to biomedical (PEP, STD testing), structural or behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care. 2a. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent and earlier linkages to services than the non-peer supported model (Control). 2b. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to greater reductions in HIV risk behaviors than the non-peer-supported model (Control). 3 (NEW). To assess the effectiveness of a peer-supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (PtW) compared to a non-peer supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (Control) for linking at-risk BMSM to PrEP services. 3a. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent receipt of PrEP education and consultations than the non-peer-supported model (Control) 3b. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent uptake of PrEP (defined as taking PrEP at six month follow-up) than the non-peer-supported model (Control).
Interventions
BEHAVIORALIntervention-Passport and Peer Mentor
In addition to the passport and incentives described below for the control condition, participants assigned to the intervention will select a peer mentor trained in motivational interviewing. The mentor will help guide the participant to complete passport items and address priorities. Participants will also be incentivized for regular meetings with his peer mentor.
BEHAVIORALControl-Passport Only
A trained staff member will use a needs assessment and the participant's own priorities to develop a 'Passport to Wellness,' a personalized set of services whose access may encourage HIV prevention or address barriers to HIV testing. Example passport items include: getting an HIV test, attending an informational session about PEP/PrEP, meeting with a PrEP provider, attending 12-step meetings, yoga classes, a massage or Reiki session, or reviewing specific HIV prevention information online. Participants will be incentivized for each passport item they complete.
Sponsors
University of California, Los Angeles
University of Southern California
Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Addiction (L.A. CADA)
Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. self identify as male 2. self-identify as Black or African American 3. sex with a male or male-to-female transgender in the last 6 months 4. intercourse without a condom in the last 6 months 5. Los Angeles County resident, 6. either is unaware of HIV status and has not tested for HIV in the last 12 months or has recently tested (within 30 days), but had not received testing in the prior 12 months * 6\) Modified 9/21/2016 to has not taken PrEP in the prior 6 months
Exclusion criteria
1. self-identify as female or transgender male or female 2. does not self-identify as Black or African American 3. no sex with a man or a male-to-female transgender in the last 6 months 4. no sexual intercourse in the last 6 months 5. resides outside of Los Angeles County 6. is HIV-positive OR has tested between 1 and 13 months prior to enrollment. * 6\) Modified 9/21/2016 to has not taken PrEP in the prior 6 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number self-reporting specific Social and Behavioral Outcomes | 6 Months | --Number of participants who obtain social and behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care. |
| Number self-reporting specific HIV/STD (sexually transmitted disease) Testing outcomes | 6 Months | --Number of participants 1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tested within one and six months of their baseline; 2) newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) obtaining testing for other STDs within six months of their baseline. |
| Number with specific PrEP outcomes | 6 Months | --Number of participants who attend a PrEP information session, meet with a PrEP provider, or obtain a new PrEP prescription. |
| Percentage of self-reporting specific Social and Behavioral Outcomes | 6 Months | --Percentage of participants who obtain social and behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care. |
| Percentage self-reporting specific HIV/STD (sexually transmitted disease) Testing outcomes | 6 Months | --Percentage of participants 1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tested within one and six months of their baseline; 2) newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) obtaining testing for other STDs within six months of their baseline. Summary data may include the percentage who report HIV or STD testing. |
| Percentage with specific PrEP outcomes | 6 Months | --Percentage of participants who attend a PrEP information session, meet with a PrEP provider, or obtain a new PrEP prescription. Summary items may include the percentage who report doing any of these three PrEP activities. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of referrals HIV tested | 6 Months | The investigators will compare between the two arms, the number of HIV tested referrals from study participants in each arm who were 1) BMSM, 2) BMSM newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) people from other race/gender/sexual orientation groups |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed