Skip to content

Functional Electrical Stimulation Use in Trans-tibial Amputations

Functional Electrical Stimulation Use in Trans-tibial Amputations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02931396
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-10-13
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2018-02-03
Last updated
2024-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Amputation of Lower Extremity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for trans-tibial amputees. The investigators aim to demonstrate that providing three months of FES intervention will increase knee extension strength, increase volume of the residual limb and decrease chronic and phantom pain.

Detailed description

SUMMARY STUDY GOALS: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of FES for trans-tibial amputees. The investigators aim to demonstrate that providing three months of FES intervention will increase knee extension strength, increase volume of the residual limb and decrease chronic and phantom pain. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Randomized control trial METHODS: Twenty participants will be recruited and randomly divided into two groups, one group will receive the FES intervention while the other group will continue with activities of daily living. Both groups will keep a daily log of number of hours the prosthesis is worn, number of hours the FES is worn (if used) and any changes in skin conditions or medications. Both groups will return for assessment visits at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and a follow up visit 3 months post-intervention for investigators to inspect the residual limb and check the fit of the prosthetic socket, record residual limb knee extension strength on the Biodex machine, take measurements (circumferences and lengths) of the residual limb with a tape measure and ruler, scan the limb with the hand held three-dimensional motion-tracking laser scanner system and the participant will be asked to complete a pain questionnaire. The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) will be completed at the 12 week and the 3 month follow-up visits. Although outcomes data were captured during each assessment visit (0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and 3 months), changes in the primary outcomes (strength, volume and pain) at timepoints 0 weeks (pre-intervention) and 12 weeks (post- intervention) were of primary interest.

Interventions

DEVICEFES

Sponsors

Alicia Koontz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women over 18 years of age. * Participants have a unilateral trans-tibial amputation with a minimum of a 4 residual limb. This length of amputation was chosen to provide for adequate surface area for the electrodes. * Participants must be a minimum of two years postoperative to insure proper healing of the limb has occurred. * Participants have chronic limb pain. * No prior experience in using TENS or FES.

Exclusion criteria

* No cardiac conditions, such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, or a pacemaker. * People with severe diabetes who have insensate skin and or neuropathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Knee Extension Isometric Strength (Peak Torque) Using the Biodex Measurement Systembaseline and 12 weeksResidual limb knee extension isometric strength was tested using a standardized Biodex protocol and custom attachment. The lever arm of the Biodex was positioned at 60 degrees of knee flexion, with the support cushion modified for the amputee and positioned at the mid-tibia. The participant was asked to extend their knee against the arm as hard as they could for five seconds.
Change in Residual Limb Volume Using 3-D Scannerbaseline and 12 weeks3-D motion-tracking laser scanning system was used to determine residual limb volume in cm
Change in Residual Limb Pain Using Likert Scale Pain Questionnairebaseline and 12 weeksScores were reported on a 0 to 10 scale with higher scores representing higher pain levels

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FES Intervention
Study participants who are randomized into the intervention group will be fitted with a portable commercially available surface FES device and instructed in its use by a study investigator. Participants will be directed to use the FES 30 minutes a day for the first week, one hour a day during the next week, 90 minutes a day during the third week, and then a minimum of 2 hours per day or 10 hours per week for the next three months at home. FES
10
Control
Participants will be asked to continue their activities of daily living as usual.
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up30
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalFES Intervention
Age, Continuous49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Knee Extension Isometric Strength (Peak Torque) Using the Biodex Measurement System

Residual limb knee extension isometric strength was tested using a standardized Biodex protocol and custom attachment. The lever arm of the Biodex was positioned at 60 degrees of knee flexion, with the support cushion modified for the amputee and positioned at the mid-tibia. The participant was asked to extend their knee against the arm as hard as they could for five seconds.

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES InterventionChange in Knee Extension Isometric Strength (Peak Torque) Using the Biodex Measurement System-0.1 Nm/kg
ControlChange in Knee Extension Isometric Strength (Peak Torque) Using the Biodex Measurement System2.2 Nm/kg
p-value: 0.768Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Residual Limb Pain Using Likert Scale Pain Questionnaire

Scores were reported on a 0 to 10 scale with higher scores representing higher pain levels

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES InterventionChange in Residual Limb Pain Using Likert Scale Pain Questionnaire-1.2 units on a scale
ControlChange in Residual Limb Pain Using Likert Scale Pain Questionnaire1.5 units on a scale
p-value: 0.03Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Residual Limb Volume Using 3-D Scanner

3-D motion-tracking laser scanning system was used to determine residual limb volume in cm

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
FES InterventionChange in Residual Limb Volume Using 3-D Scanner-1.6 cm
ControlChange in Residual Limb Volume Using 3-D Scanner23.9 cm
p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026