Skip to content

Comparison of Two Electroencephalograms (EEG) Monitors in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

Monitoring the Responses to Nociceptive Stimuli During General Anesthesia Based on Electroencephalographic Signals, an Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02928172
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-10-10
Start date
2018-01-02
Completion date
2023-02-20
Last updated
2024-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Deep Sedation

Keywords

q-CON, q-NOX, BIS, Electroencephalograms (EEG), Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA), Sedation, General Anesthesia

Brief summary

Hypothesis: There is a statistically measurable correlation between qNOX and rough clinical signs of insufficient anti-nociception such as movements during Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion, skin Incision, LMA removal. It will reduce the problem of anticipating the nociception in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Objectives: 1. to compare two indexes of hypnosis, the qCON (Quantium Medical, Spain) with the Bispectral index (BIS™) (Covidien, Boulder CO. USA), in patients undergoing surgery under sedation and general anesthesia. 2. to assess the qNOX index of pain/nociception (Quantium Medical, Barcelona, Spain) and the qCON index of hypnosis. 3. to assess qNOX reliability as a specific indicator of response to nociceptive stimulation.

Detailed description

Monitoring the anti-nociceptive drug effect is useful because a sudden and strong nociceptive stimulus may result in untoward autonomic responses and muscular reflex movements. Unopposed stimulation may also 'overrule' a state of stable unconsciousness, with resultant awakening and awareness. The traditional clinical use of systolic or mean blood pressure is actually still one of the methods in everyday use for this monitoring purpose. Another cornerstone is the experience of which drugs and doses are effective in attenuating nociception. Alpiger and colleagues found that simple end-tidal monitoring of sevoflurane was a better predictor of nociceptive response than Auditory Evoked Potential. Thus, monitoring the state of anti-nociception with objective, non-clinical methods is still in a state of testing and development, without well-documented and proven methods for consistent 'no-fuss' clinical daily use. Some methods, like those using systolic blood pressure, are based on the reduced sympathetic response from the Central Nervous System (CNS) when in a state of drug-induced anti-nociception during concomitant surgical stress. These include the pulse plethysmogram amplitude, heart rate variability and/or amplitude, pupillometry, muscle tonus and skin conductance.They all have limitations in interpretation, as the state of sympathetic tone is strongly influenced by numerous factors, including hypovolemia, vasopressors, atropine and patient positioning. In addition, sympathetic tone is very unspecific in the awake or lightly sedated patient, as mood and subjective feelings have a strong impact. Attempts are also been made on using the EEG for monitoring of anti-nociception. This approach has been challenged as difficult, as most of the antinociceptive drugs effects are in the periphery, the medullary cord or deeper cerebral layers, far from the EEG signals derived from the frontal cortex. However, EEG is a 'mirror' of what is going on in other parts of the CNS and peripheral nervous system. One problem is to elucidate how the EEG signals may be used in a sensitive and specific way to reflect anti-nociception. Concepts such as response-entropy, Composite Variability Index and BIS variability score have been tested and launched. Quantium Medical has an EEG-based algorithm with two outputs: the qCON for unconsciousness and the qNOX for anti-nociception. This means that calculates and displays two indices. One, the qCON, is designed to provide information about the depth of the hypnotic state, similar to that provided by the BIS™ and Sedline™ monitor (Masimo, Irvine CA). The second index, the qNOX, is designed to provide information about the depth of the antinociceptive state. The qCON has shown a comparable performance with BIS, and qNOX has proved correlation with rough clinical signs of insufficient antinociception, such as movements during LMA insertion, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Interventions

DEVICEqCON-qNOX

Each subject will have the qCON-qNOX monitor on his/her forehead + the BIS monitor

DEVICEBIS

Each subject will have the BIS monitor on his/her forehead + the qCON-qNOX monitor

Sponsors

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled to undergo general surgical procedures with general anesthesia/LMA. * Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document. * 18 - 80 years of age. * ASA Class I - III adults of either sex

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to consent * Withdrawal criteria * Electrodes should be changed when patient's skin impedance value exceeds 15 kΩ after conditioning skin properly. If after two changes of electrodes, impedance remains above 15 kΩ, patient will be excluded from the present study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Movements as Response to Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) InsertionApproximately 10 minutesCorrelation between qNOX-qNOX and rough clinical signs of insufficient anti-nociception during Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion occurs during the induction, lasting an average of 5-10 minutes. Total number of movements reported for the group as a whole and not per participant.
Number Coughing/BuckingIntraoperative period (30 minutes to 3 hours)Coughing/bucking as a response to intraoperative stimuli. The total number of coughing/bucking reported intraoperatively for the group as a whole was recorded. The intraoperative period lasted approximately 30 min to 3 hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Intraoperative MovementsIntraoperative period (30 minutes to 3 hours)Movements as a response to intraoperative stimuli. The total number of movements reported intraoperatively for the group as a whole was recorded. The intraoperative period lasted approximately 30 min to 3 hours.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Depth of Anesthesia
Subjects will have the qCON-qNOX and BIS monitor qCON-qNOX: Each subject will have the qCON-qNOX monitor on his/her forehead + the BIS monitor BIS: Each subject will have the BIS monitor on his/her forehead + the qCON-qNOX monitor
59
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDevice did not record data1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDepth of Anesthesia
Age, Continuous52.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Movements as Response to Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion

Correlation between qNOX-qNOX and rough clinical signs of insufficient anti-nociception during Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion occurs during the induction, lasting an average of 5-10 minutes. Total number of movements reported for the group as a whole and not per participant.

Time frame: Approximately 10 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Depth of AnesthesiaMovements as Response to Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion16 Number of Movements for the whole group
Primary

Number Coughing/Bucking

Coughing/bucking as a response to intraoperative stimuli. The total number of coughing/bucking reported intraoperatively for the group as a whole was recorded. The intraoperative period lasted approximately 30 min to 3 hours.

Time frame: Intraoperative period (30 minutes to 3 hours)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Depth of AnesthesiaNumber Coughing/Bucking21 Number of intraop coughing/bucking
Secondary

Number of Intraoperative Movements

Movements as a response to intraoperative stimuli. The total number of movements reported intraoperatively for the group as a whole was recorded. The intraoperative period lasted approximately 30 min to 3 hours.

Time frame: Intraoperative period (30 minutes to 3 hours)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Depth of AnesthesiaNumber of Intraoperative Movements21 number of intraop movements

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026