Skip to content

Addressing Barriers to Adult Hearing Healthcare

Addressing Barriers to Adult Hearing Healthcare

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02928107
Enrollment
1146
Registered
2016-10-10
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2021-08-27
Last updated
2021-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geriatric Disorder, Hearing Loss

Brief summary

The aim of this project is to develop evidence that can inform hearing health care best practices for adults between the ages of 65-75, and determine what level of involvement by the primary care practitioner (PCP) is required to inform and encourage adults age 65-75 to follow through with routine hearing screening. This study also aims to evaluate the accuracy of assessment of medical conditions for which the FDA requires physician evaluation and management prior to hearing aid fitting, and determine which medical conditions should require medical evaluation prior to hearing aid fitting. The results of this study should provide information to implement changes in health care policy to facilitate accessible and affordable hearing health care.

Detailed description

Age-related hearing loss is the third-most common chronic condition affecting older adults in the US (data from Healthy People 2020 US Dept of Health and Human Services). This study aims to improve the understanding of attitudes, barriers and facilitators needed to improve hearing health care delivery. Two study cohorts of study participants between the ages of 65 - 75 are proposed. The first cohort of participants include healthy adults being seen by a primary care provider (PCP) for a routine appointment. Each participating primary care practice is assigned to one of three different telephone hearing screening strategies that include progressive levels of PCP time and guidance to complete telephone-based hearing screening. Those who fail a telephone hearing screening go on to a medical referral study and receive (1) diagnostic audiological testing and (2) determination of the reliability and validity of identification of conditions that should require medical referral prior to hearing aid provision (called FDA 'Red Flag' conditions, including conditions such as sudden hearing loss, cerumen impaction, conductive hearing loss, dizziness, external deformity, ear drainage). We will evaluate the proportion of subjects in Groups 1 and 2 who dial the phone number and complete the telephone hearing test at or within two months of their PCP visit, relative to Group 3, and the proportion of subjects in all groups who: a) schedule and b) complete the visit for diagnostic audiological testing, and subsequently, c) complete a plan for appropriate hearing loss intervention, if indicated, within four months of initial hearing screening. Enrollment in this cohort is complete. 955 subjects were screened for eligibility. Of those, 660 patients were enrolled. The second cohort includes adults who are being seen for a routine appointment for a complaint of hearing loss at one of several participating Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) practices in the CHEER network. Information about Red Flag conditions will be obtained from the patient, audiologist, and ENT provider. This information, along with Red Flag data from the PCP Cohort, will be used to evaluate the accuracy of assessment of medical conditions for which the FDA requires physician evaluation and management prior to hearing aid fitting, and determine which medical conditions should require medical evaluation prior to hearing aid fitting. Enrollment in this cohort is ongoing. The anticipated enrollment goal is 500 subjects.

Interventions

OTHERTele-HS

Patients will be given information on the Tele-HS and given access to take the screening at home or in-office, depending on arm.

OTHERPCP encouragement

Patients will or will not either receive PCP encouragement to do the Tele-HS.

Sponsors

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
CollaboratorNIH
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Primary Care Cohort: Inclusion Criteria: * 65-75 years of age * Being seen by PCP for non-acute follow-up or annual appointment for primary care * No prior history of hearing aid use or self-reported diagnosis of hearing loss

Exclusion criteria

* Not between the ages of 65-75 * Current or past hearing aid user * Patient has been tested by an audiologist in the past and self-reports a hearing loss diagnosis * Being seen by the PCP for an acute illness CHEER Cohort: Inclusion Criteria: * 65-75 years of age * Being seen by an OHNS/ENT provider for a complaint of hearing loss. * Is scheduled to have an audiogram as standard of care for complaint of hearing loss. * No prior diagnosis of hearing loss by a medical professional or history of hearing aid use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Completion of Tele-HS screen2 months of PCP appointment (day 1)The proportion (%) of subjects in Groups 1 and 2 who take the test will be compared to those in Group 3.
Medical conditions for which the FDA requires physician evaluation prior to hearing aid fitting1 day (following completion of Red Flag questionnaires by patient, audiologist and medical provider)Analysis of medical conditions for which the FDA requires physician evaluation prior to hearing aid fitting by comparing red flag assessments from patient, audiologist and ENT provider (CHEER Cohort)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scheduling of follow-up audiological testing4 months of date of Tele-HSThe proportion (%) of subjects in Groups 1 and 2 who fail the Tele-HS and schedule follow-up testing compared to those in Group 3.
Completion of follow-up audiological testing4 months of date of Tele-HSThe proportion (%) of subjects in Groups 1 and 2 who fail the Tele-HS and complete follow-up testing compared to those in Group 3.
Completion of plan for appropriate hearing loss intervention, if applicable4 months of date of Tele-HSThe proportion (%) of subjects in Groups 1 and 2 who fail the Tele-HS, complete follow-up testing, and complete a plan for hearing loss intervention, if applicable, compared to those in Group 3.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attitudes towards hearing loss2 daysAnalysis of attitudes towards hearing loss using the ALHQ questionnaire and focus group discussions
Cost to conduct telephone hearing screening in the Primary Care clinic setting1 dayCost to conduct hearing screening based on costs of educational material, telephone screening test, provider time and clinic space. (Both Cohorts)
Attitudes of communication partners regarding hearing loss1 day, completion of the Significant Other Hearing Questionnaire (SOS-HEAR)Evaluation of how attitudes of significant others impact decision making to pursue hearing screening, diagnostic testing, and intervention.
Significance of medical conditions requiring medical evaluation prior to hearing aid fitting1 day, completion of patient, audiologist and provider questionnairesAnalysis to determine what medical conditions should require medical evaluation prior to hearing aid fitting (CHEER Cohort)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026