Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase (FLT3) / Internal Tandem Duplication (ITD) Mutation
Conditions
Keywords
Acute myeloid leukemia, First Complete Remission, gilteritinib, FLT3/ITD, AML, ASP2215
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) between participants with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) / internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) and who were randomized to receive gilteritinib or placebo beginning after completion of induction/consolidation chemotherapy for a two-year period.
Detailed description
Participants in CR1 were approached for this study after induction/consolidation therapy was complete and a decision not to proceed with transplantation was made or a suitable donor could not be identified. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive gilteritinib or placebo. Participants entered the screening period up to 14 days prior to the start of treatment. Participants were administered treatment over continuous 28-day cycles. Gilteritinib or placebo was given daily for up to 2 years. After treatment discontinuation, participants had a 30-day follow-up visit for safety, after which the participants entered the long-term follow up period for collection of subsequent AML treatment, remission status, and survival (cause of death and date of death). Final database lock will occur when last subject last follow-up visit is reached, per protocol. Study drug was not provided during the follow-up period.
Interventions
Oral tablet
Oral tablet
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subject is considered an adult according to local regulation at the time of obtaining consent form (ICF). * Subject consents to allow access to subject's diagnostic bone marrow aspirate or peripheral blood sample and/or the DNA derived from that sample, if available, that may be used to validate a companion diagnostic test for gilteritinib. * Subject has confirmed morphologically documented AML, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), in CR1 (including CRp and CRi). For the purposes of enrollment, CR will be defined as \< 5% blasts in the bone marrow with no morphologic characteristics of acute leukemia (e.g., Auer rods) in the bone marrow with no evidence of extramedullary disease such as central nervous system involvement or granulocytic sarcoma. * Subject will not proceed with transplantation as either a decision not to proceed with transplantation has been made either on the recommendation of the treating physician or by the patient or a suitable donor could not be identified. * Subject is \< 2 months from the start of the last cycle of consolidation and should have completed the recommended number of consolidations per local practice. * Subject has had no use of investigational agents, with the exception of FLT3 inhibiting agents during induction and/or consolidation therapy, within the prior 4 weeks. * Subject has had presence of the FLT3/ITD activating mutation in the bone marrow or peripheral blood as determined by the local institution at diagnosis. * Subject has an ECOG performance status 0 to 2. * Subject must meet the following criteria as indicated on the clinical laboratory tests: * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN), or if serum creatinine outside normal range, then glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \> 40 mL/min/1.73m\^2 as calculated with the 4-parameter Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. * Serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 mg/dL (43 μmol/L), except for subjects with Gilbert's syndrome. * Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 3 x ULN. * Serum potassium and serum magnesium ≥ institutional lower limit of normal (LLN). * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/μl and platelets ≥ 20000/μl (unsupported by transfusions). * Subject is suitable for oral administration of study drug. * Female subject must either: * Be of nonchildbearing potential: * Postmenopausal (defined as at least 1 year without any menses) prior to screening, or * Documented surgically sterile or status posthysterectomy (at least 1 month prior to screening) * Or, if of childbearing potential, * Agree not to try to become pregnant during the study and for 6 months after the final study drug administration * And have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test at screening * And, if heterosexually active, agree to consistently use highly effective contraception per locally accepted standards (in addition to a barrier method) starting at screening and throughout the study period and for 6 months after the final study drug administration. * Female subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 2 months and 1 week after the final study drug administration. * Female subject must not donate ova starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 6 months after the final study drug administration. * Male subject and subject's female partners who are of childbearing potential must be using highly effective contraception per locally accepted standards (in addition to a barrier method) starting at screening and continue throughout the study period and for 4 months and 1 week after the final study drug administration. * Male subject must not donate sperm starting at screening and throughout the study period and for 4 months and 1 week after the final study drug administration. * Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.
Exclusion criteria
* Subject has had prior allogeneic transplant. * Subject has QTcF interval \> 450 msec (average of triplicate determinations based on central reading). * Subject with Long QT Syndrome. * Subject with hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia at screening (defined as values below LLN). * Subject has clinically active central nervous system leukemia. * Subject is known to have human immunodeficiency virus infection. * Subject has active hepatitis B or C. * Subject has an uncontrolled infection. If a bacterial or viral infection is present, the subject must be receiving definitive therapy and have no signs of progressing infection for 72 hours prior to randomization. If a fungal infection is present, the subject must be receiving definitive systemic anti-fungal therapy and have no signs of progressing infection for 1 week prior to randomization. * Subject has progressing infection defined as hemodynamic instability attributable to sepsis or new symptoms, worsening physical signs or radiographic findings attributable to infection. Persisting fever without other signs or symptoms will not be interpreted as progressing infection. * Subject has uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4 or subject has a history of congestive heart failure NYHA class 3 or 4 in the past, unless a screening echocardiogram or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan performed within 1 month prior to study entry results in a left ventricular ejection fraction that is ≥ 45%. * Subject requires treatment with concomitant drugs that are strong inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. * Subject requires treatment with concomitant drugs that are strong inhibitors or inducers of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) with the exception of drugs that are considered absolutely essential for the care of the subject. * Subject requires treatment with concomitant drugs that target serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1 (5HT1R) or 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B (5HT2BR) or sigma nonspecific receptor with the exception of drugs that are considered absolutely essential for the care of the subject. * Subject has a serious medical or psychiatric illness likely to interfere with participation in this clinical study. * Subject has prior malignancies, except resected basal cell carcinoma or treated cervical carcinoma in situ. Cancer treated with curative intent ≥ 5 years previously will be allowed. Cancer treated with curative intent \< 5 years previously will not be allowed. * Subject has any condition which makes the subject unsuitable for study participation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Adjudication | From the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse, or death; (Median time on study drug was 427 days for gilteritinib group and 212 days for placebo group) | RFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Relapse after complete remission (CR) \[including complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)\], was defined as bone marrow blasts 5% or higher (not attributable to regenerating bone marrow), any circulating blasts, any extra-medullary blast foci as per Revised International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Participants were classified as: CRi, if they fulfilled all the criteria for CR except for incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 × 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence was not required. CRp, if they achieved CR except for incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). RFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. hazard ratio (HR), cox proportional hazards model (CHM) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause; (Median time on study drug was 427 days for gilteritinib group and 212 days for placebo group) | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meiers method. |
| Event-Free Survival (EFS) | From date of randomization until the date of documented relapse or discontinuation of the treatment, or initiation of other anti-leukemic treatment or death from any cause; (Median time on study drug was 427 days for gilteritinib and 212 days for Placebo) | EFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse or discontinuation of the treatment, or initiation of other anti-leukemic treatment or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Relapse after CR (including CRp and CRi), was defined as bone marrow blasts 5% or higher (not attributable to regenerating bone marrow), any circulating blasts, any extra-medullary blast foci as per Revised IWG criteria. Participants were classified as: CRi, if they fulfilled all the criteria for CR except for incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 × 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence was not required. CRp, if they achieved CR except for incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier's method. |
| Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Baseline and months 3, 6, 12, 24/EoT | MRD was measured from bone marrow samples. FLT3/ITD mutation ratio was measured in relation to total FLT3. For a participant with multiple ITD mutations, the overall FLT3/ITD mutation ratio was calculated from the sum of all ITD mutations. Absence of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) is defined as log10-transformed overall FLT3/ITD mutation ratio ≤ -4. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | From first dose date up to 30 days after last dose or data cut-off date 25-May 2021 (Maximum treatment duration was 744 days) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. It can, be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product whether considered related to the medicinal product. An AE is considered serious if, it results in results in death, is life-threatening (an AE is considered life-threatening if, its occurrence places the participant at immediate risk of death, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, results in congenital anomaly or birth defect, Requires inpatient hospitalization (except for planned procedures as allowed per study) or leads to prolongation of hospitalization. TEAE was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose. |
| Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10. 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24/EoT | ECOG performance status was measured on an 6 point scale. 0-Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. Dead. Number of participants with ECOG PS was reported. ECOG PS grades with zero participants were not reported. |
Countries
Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Adult participants diagnosed with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)/internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), including complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) for whom a decision not to proceed with transplantation was made, or a suitable donor could not be identified, were enrolled in this study.
Pre-assignment details
Randomization was stratified based on: Age (\<60 or ≥60 years), Geographic region (North America or Europe or rest of the world), Presence of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at screening (yes or no), Use of FLT3-inhibiting agents during induction/consolidation (yes or no).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Gilteritinib Participants received gilteritinib 120 mg (three tablets of 40 mg) orally, QD for up to 2 years or until a protocol-defined discontinuation criterion was met. | 63 |
| Placebo Participants received gilteritinib matching placebo orally, QD for up to 2 years or until a protocol-defined discontinuation criterion was met. | 35 |
| Total | 98 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Term Follow-up (Up to 1201 Days) | Death | 23 | 12 |
| Long Term Follow-up (Up to 1201 Days) | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Long Term Follow-up (Up to 1201 Days) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 2 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Adverse Event | 7 | 1 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Becomes eligible for and proceeds to transplant | 0 | 1 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Clinicians decision as suspected relapse | 0 | 1 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Disease Relapse | 23 | 18 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Investigators decision to take participant off trial due to molecular relapse | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | MRD positive | 0 | 1 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Participant relapsed and became eligible for and proceeded to transplant | 0 | 1 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Participant was not eligible for the study | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Randomized in error | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Treatment ended due to transplant procedure | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (Up to 744 Days) | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Gilteritinib | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (<60 or ≥60 years) <60 years | 24 Participants | 37 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Age (<60 or ≥60 years) ≥60 years | 39 Participants | 61 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 61.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 60.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 | 59.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 50 Participants | 79 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants | 10 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Geographic Region Europe | 40 Participants | 60 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Geographic Region North America | 5 Participants | 9 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Geographic Region Rest of the world | 18 Participants | 29 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Presence of MRD MRD = No | 55 Participants | 84 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Presence of MRD MRD = Yes | 8 Participants | 14 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 17 Participants | 27 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 8 Participants | 11 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 38 Participants | 60 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 31 Participants | 51 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 32 Participants | 47 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Use of FLT3-inhibitors Use of FLT3 Inhibitor = No | 51 Participants | 76 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Use of FLT3-inhibitors Use of FLT3 Inhibitor = Yes | 12 Participants | 22 Participants | 10 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 24 / 63 | 12 / 35 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 53 / 62 | 32 / 35 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 24 / 62 | 14 / 35 |
Outcome results
Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Adjudication
RFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Relapse after complete remission (CR) \[including complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)\], was defined as bone marrow blasts 5% or higher (not attributable to regenerating bone marrow), any circulating blasts, any extra-medullary blast foci as per Revised International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Participants were classified as: CRi, if they fulfilled all the criteria for CR except for incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 × 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence was not required. CRp, if they achieved CR except for incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). RFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. hazard ratio (HR), cox proportional hazards model (CHM)
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse, or death; (Median time on study drug was 427 days for gilteritinib group and 212 days for placebo group)
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Gilteritinib | Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Adjudication | 24.02 Months |
| Placebo | Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Adjudication | 15.84 Months |
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT)
MRD was measured from bone marrow samples. FLT3/ITD mutation ratio was measured in relation to total FLT3. For a participant with multiple ITD mutations, the overall FLT3/ITD mutation ratio was calculated from the sum of all ITD mutations. Absence of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) is defined as log10-transformed overall FLT3/ITD mutation ratio ≤ -4.
Time frame: Baseline and months 3, 6, 12, 24/EoT
Population: FAS population with available data at specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilteritinib | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 12 | -0.11 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Gilteritinib | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 3 | 0.14 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Gilteritinib | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 24/EoT | -0.12 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Gilteritinib | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 6 | 0.07 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 24/EoT | 0.23 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 3 | 0.14 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 12 | -0.34 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Minimal Residual Disease Measured as Log10-transformed Overall FLT3/ITD Mutation Ratio at Months 3, 6, 12, 24/End of Treatment (EoT) | Month 6 | -0.17 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
EFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse or discontinuation of the treatment, or initiation of other anti-leukemic treatment or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Relapse after CR (including CRp and CRi), was defined as bone marrow blasts 5% or higher (not attributable to regenerating bone marrow), any circulating blasts, any extra-medullary blast foci as per Revised IWG criteria. Participants were classified as: CRi, if they fulfilled all the criteria for CR except for incomplete hematological recovery with residual neutropenia \< 1 × 10\^9/L with or without complete platelet recovery. RBC and platelet transfusion independence was not required. CRp, if they achieved CR except for incomplete platelet recovery (\< 100 × 10\^9/L). EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier's method.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of documented relapse or discontinuation of the treatment, or initiation of other anti-leukemic treatment or death from any cause; (Median time on study drug was 427 days for gilteritinib and 212 days for Placebo)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Gilteritinib | Event-Free Survival (EFS) | 14.06 Months |
| Placebo | Event-Free Survival (EFS) | 6.74 Months |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. It can, be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product whether considered related to the medicinal product. An AE is considered serious if, it results in results in death, is life-threatening (an AE is considered life-threatening if, its occurrence places the participant at immediate risk of death, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, results in congenital anomaly or birth defect, Requires inpatient hospitalization (except for planned procedures as allowed per study) or leads to prolongation of hospitalization. TEAE was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose.
Time frame: From first dose date up to 30 days after last dose or data cut-off date 25-May 2021 (Maximum treatment duration was 744 days)
Population: The safety analysis set (SAF) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE | 58 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Treatment | 5 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Serious TEAE | 24 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction | 15 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE before Relapse | 57 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction | 14 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related Serious TEAE | 10 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption | 35 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE | 51 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption | 31 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Death | 1 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | 42 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE before Relapse | 51 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Grade 3 or Higher Drug-related TEAE | 33 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Death | 0 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Death | 20 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Treatment | 15 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Death | 11 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE | 33 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE | 20 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE before Relapse | 28 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE before Relapse | 15 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Serious TEAE | 14 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related Serious TEAE | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Death | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Treatment | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Treatment | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | 18 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Grade 3 or Higher Drug-related TEAE | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Death | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score
ECOG performance status was measured on an 6 point scale. 0-Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. Dead. Number of participants with ECOG PS was reported. ECOG PS grades with zero participants were not reported.
Time frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10. 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24/EoT
Population: Safety population with available data at specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Baseline: Grade 0 | 39 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Baseline: Grade 1 | 23 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 2: Grade 0 | 38 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 2: Grade 1 | 16 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 2: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 3: Grade 0 | 33 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 3: Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 3: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 4: Grade 0 | 37 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 4: Grade 1 | 12 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 5: Grade 0 | 35 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 5: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 6: Grade 0 | 32 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 6: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 8: Grade 0 | 32 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 8: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 8: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 10: Grade 0 | 29 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 10: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 12: Grade 0 | 24 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 12: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 14: Grade 0 | 21 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 14: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 16: Grade 0 | 22 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 16: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 16: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 18: Grade 0 | 19 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 18: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 20: Grade 0 | 18 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 20: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 22: Grade 0 | 20 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 22: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 0 | 34 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Gilteritinib | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 10: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Baseline: Grade 0 | 22 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 0 | 20 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Baseline: Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 12: Grade 0 | 14 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 2: Grade 0 | 18 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 20: Grade 0 | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 2: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 12: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 2: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 3: Grade 0 | 20 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 14: Grade 0 | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 3: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 20: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 3: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 14: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 4: Grade 0 | 16 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 4: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 16: Grade 0 | 11 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 5: Grade 0 | 17 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 22: Grade 0 | 11 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 5: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 16: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 6: Grade 0 | 17 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 6: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 16: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 8: Grade 0 | 12 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 22: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 8: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 18: Grade 0 | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 8: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 24/EoT: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 10: Grade 0 | 14 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Score | Month 18: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meiers method.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause; (Median time on study drug was 427 days for gilteritinib group and 212 days for placebo group)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Gilteritinib | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Months |
| Placebo | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Months |