Skip to content

Silk-Like Bed Linens for Prevention of Unit-Acquired Ulcers

Clinical Trial of Silk-Like Linens for Prevention of Unit-Acquired Pressure Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02925741
Enrollment
3343
Registered
2016-10-06
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2020-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pressure Ulcer

Keywords

bed linens

Brief summary

This study will use a traditional parallel randomization design with patients in five medical intensive care units at the Cleveland Clinic to evaluate the efficacy of silk-like bed sheets and underpads for prevention of Unit-Acquired Pressure Ulcers (UAPU). Adult hospitalized patients in beds with standard bed linens versus those with silk-like linens will be compared for 1) rate of development of UAPU, 2) time to develop the first UAPU, and the maximum severity of any UAPU that develop. Bed linens will be changed per unit protocol. Patient characteristics will be summarized using frequencies and percentages for categorical factors and means, standard deviations, percentiles and median and range for continuous measures. For the primary outcome of unit-acquired pressure ulcer rate, generalized linear mixed models, assuming a Poisson distribution for the outcome, and unit length of stay as an offset will be used. For the time to event analysis, frailty models will be used to assess whether time to first pressure ulcer differs between treatment types. Generalized linear mixed models will be used for other secondary endpoints, including maximum severity of observed pressure ulcers

Detailed description

Although there has been a large amount of research published on contributing factors to pressure ulcers, there has been little research related to the role that bed linens play in affecting moisture, friction, and shear that may lead to development of unit-acquired pressure ulcers (UAPU) for patients in acute care settings. This study will use a traditional parallel randomized design with patients in five medical intensive care units at the Cleveland Clinic to evaluate the efficacy of silk-like bed sheets and underpads for prevention of Unit-Acquired Pressure Ulcers (UAPU). Patients were randomly assigned by personnel who were blinded to the intervention based on bed availability. Nurses will assess all patients on standard bed linens and silk-like linens for development of UAPU. Adult hospitalized patients in beds with standard bed linens versus those with silk-like linens will be compared for 1) rate of development of UAPU, 2) time to develop the first UAPU, and the maximum severity of any UAPU that develop. Upon entry into the study, all patients will be assessed for baseline skin integrity by the admitting nurse. Demographic data (MRN; unit name; type of linen on bed; admitting diagnosis; dates of admission/discharge; age; gender; race; weight; Braden score; date, location, and stages of UAPU development; lab values (albumin, total protein); and categories of the Charlson Comorbidity Index will be recorded on data collection form by research nurse. Bed linens will be changed per unit protocol. A sample size of 3456 patients is estimated. Patient characteristics will be summarized using frequencies and percentages for categorical factors and means, standard deviations, percentiles and median and range for continuous measures. Comparisons of these patient characteristics, including Braden score, Charlson comorbidity index, unit length of stay and hospital length of stay, will be compared between linen types using generalized linear mixed effect models. For the primary outcome of unit-acquired pressure ulcer rate, generalized linear mixed models, assuming a Poisson distribution for the outcome, and unit length of stay as an offset will be used. In these models, linen type and study period will be used as fixed effects and each unit will be included as a random effect. For the time to event analysis, frailty models will be used to assess whether time to first pressure ulcer differs between treatment types. Generalized linear mixed models will be used for other secondary endpoints, including maximum severity of observed pressure ulcers.

Interventions

OTHERSilk-Like Linens

Synthetic moisture-wicking fabric

Sponsors

Standard Textile
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Precision Fabrics Group, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Of 5 Medical ICUs at 1 quaternary care medical center, patients were assigned to groups based on bed availability by personnel who were blinded to linens used on those units.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients admitted into the medical intensive care unit during the one year study period

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are transferred from one study unit to another study unit, data for their days on the second unit will be measured only if the second unit is in the same study arm as the sending unit * Patients who are in the prone position * Patients remaining on a unit past the two week washout period, will not be included in the crossover arm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Development of Unit-acquired Pressure UlcersDuring MICU admissionTotal count of the number of patients who developed unit acquired pressure ulcers during the study (count)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Time to Develop the First Unit-acquired Pressure UlcerDays from admission to HAPIThe number of days spent in the intensive care unit prior to the development of a pressure ulcer
Maximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)During MICU admissionHAPI staged by trained clinical nurses using the National Pressure Advisory Panel (NPUAP) staging definitions in which Stage 1 is the least severe with severity progressing through Stage 2, 3, 4, and unstageable. Unstageable is an evolving type of pressure injury evolving into a Stage 3 or 4.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Eleven patients refused the synthetic linens.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Silk-like Linen
Patients cared for on silk-like linen.
1,626
Standard Cotton Linen
Patients cared for on standard cotton linen
1,706
Total3,332

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalStandard Cotton LinenSilk-like Linen
Admission Type
Direct Admission
80 Participants37 Participants43 Participants
Admission Type
Emergency Department
1449 Participants729 Participants720 Participants
Admission Type
Inpatient
852 Participants452 Participants400 Participants
Admission Type
Outside
944 Participants484 Participants460 Participants
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
Albumin, mg/dL3.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
3.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
3.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71
APACHE66.9 calculated score (high= high acuity)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.2
66.4 calculated score (high= high acuity)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.8
67.5 calculated score (high= high acuity)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.7
Braden Score15.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
15.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
15.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
Charlson Comorbidity Index
0
591 Participants282 Participants309 Participants
Charlson Comorbidity Index
1-2
1289 Participants690 Participants599 Participants
Charlson Comorbidity Index
3-4
890 Participants439 Participants451 Participants
Charlson Comorbidity Index
5 or more
557 Participants293 Participants264 Participants
Diagnostic Category
Cardiovascular
1015 Participants510 Participants505 Participants
Diagnostic Category
Gastrointestinal
467 Participants250 Participants217 Participants
Diagnostic Category
Hematologic
249 Participants104 Participants145 Participants
Diagnostic Category
Other
446 Participants256 Participants190 Participants
Diagnostic Category
Respiratory
999 Participants491 Participants508 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1037 Participants499 Participants538 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
181 Participants103 Participants78 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2114 Participants1104 Participants1010 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1565 Participants796 Participants769 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1765 Participants909 Participants856 Participants
Total Protein, mg/dL6.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03
6.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
6.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
Weight; kgs85.4 kgs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.1
85.4 kgs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.6
85.5 kgs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 1,6260 / 1,706
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1,6260 / 1,706

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Development of Unit-acquired Pressure Ulcers

Total count of the number of patients who developed unit acquired pressure ulcers during the study (count)

Time frame: During MICU admission

Population: Total count and percentage of patients who developed a hospital acquired pressure injury (HAPI)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Silk-Like LinenRate of Development of Unit-acquired Pressure Ulcers45 Participants
Standard Cotton LinenRate of Development of Unit-acquired Pressure Ulcers42 Participants
Secondary

Maximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)

HAPI staged by trained clinical nurses using the National Pressure Advisory Panel (NPUAP) staging definitions in which Stage 1 is the least severe with severity progressing through Stage 2, 3, 4, and unstageable. Unstageable is an evolving type of pressure injury evolving into a Stage 3 or 4.

Time frame: During MICU admission

Population: For all patients, maximum stage of HAPI during medical intensive care unit (MICU) stay

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Silk-Like LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)Stage 16 Participants
Silk-Like LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)Stage 2-420 Participants
Silk-Like LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)Unstageable15 Participants
Silk-Like LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)No HAPI1585 Participants
Standard Cotton LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)No HAPI1660 Participants
Standard Cotton LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)Stage 19 Participants
Standard Cotton LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)Unstageable15 Participants
Standard Cotton LinenMaximum Severity of Unit Acquired Pressure Injury (UAPI)Stage 2-422 Participants
Secondary

The Time to Develop the First Unit-acquired Pressure Ulcer

The number of days spent in the intensive care unit prior to the development of a pressure ulcer

Time frame: Days from admission to HAPI

Population: Number of days from admission to first HAPI for patients who developed a HAPI

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Silk-Like LinenThe Time to Develop the First Unit-acquired Pressure Ulcer6 days
Standard Cotton LinenThe Time to Develop the First Unit-acquired Pressure Ulcer6 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026