Skip to content

A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Insertion Methods

A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Insertion Methods: Conventional vs Inflated Balloon Method

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02924948
Enrollment
482
Registered
2016-10-05
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2016-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Throat Pain After EUS Insertion

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasonography

Brief summary

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an essential technique required in diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases. In previous studies, 6% of patients who undergone EUS had significant throat pain. (NRS scale 5 or greater) Although some endoscopists think balloon inflation while EUS insertion could result in decreased throat damage and pain, there is no data to back up. We designed a single center randomized pilot study to compare throat pain caused by EUS insertion with conventional vs balloon inflation method.

Detailed description

All patients who are undergoing EUS with radial type echoendoscope will be asked for an informed consent. Subjects will be randomized to conventional insertion arm and balloon inflated insertion arm. All patients will be sedated according to SNUH endoscopy center protocol. Conventional insertion will be done in conventional insertion group, and balloon inflation before the start of procedure will be done in balloon inflated insertion arm. After the EUS procedure is finished, subject will be moved to a recovery room. As soon as the subject is recovered from sedation, throat pain will be assessed in NRS scale and be recoreded. Information of insertion failure and balloon damage during insertion will be also collected.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBalloon inflation

EUS balloon inflation will be done before insertion through the subjects throat

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged from 20 to 80 * Patients undergoing EUS with radial echoendoscope

Exclusion criteria

* Refuse to participate the study * Refuse EUS procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Throat painAssess right after the end of the EUS procedureThroat pain assessed by NRS scale 5 or over will be considered as positive

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Throat pain intensityAssess right after the end of the EUS procedureThroat pain assessed in NRS scale which has a range of 0 to 10
EUS Insertion failure rateRight after insertionTo assess the EUS insertion failure rate
Damaged balloon rateduring EUS procedureInability to inflate the balloon after insertion of EUS will be counted

Contacts

Primary ContactSang Hyub Lee, MD. PhD.
gidoctor@snuh.org82-2-2072-2228

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026