Skip to content

Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System Study for PAD (Disrupt PAD III)

Randomized Study of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty® System Used in Combination With DCB Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty Used in Combination With DCB to Treat Moderate and Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Arteries

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02923193
Enrollment
306
Registered
2016-10-04
Start date
2017-02-22
Completion date
2022-06-02
Last updated
2023-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Brief summary

Shockwave Medical Inc. intends to conduct a prospective, multi-center, single blind, randomized (1:1) study of Lithoplasty treatment used in combination with DCB versus standard balloon angioplasty used in combination with DCB to treat moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal arteries. Assuming that roughly 15% of the subjects will be lost-to-follow-up, a total of up to 400 subjects (200 per treatment arm) will be enrolled in the study at up to 60 sites in Europe, the United States and New Zealand. In addition to the randomized study, an observational study of subjects who do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the randomized study will be conducted. The objective of the observational study is to assess the real-world acute performance of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System in the treatment of calcified, stenotic, peripheral arteries. The observational study is a prospective, multi-center, single arm observational study for subjects who do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the randomized study. A maximum of 1500 subjects at the same 60 sites will be enrolled in the observational study. Once enrollment in the randomized portion of the study is complete, subjects may continue to be enrolled in the observational study provided they meet OS eligibility criteria. Results for the observational study will be reported in a separate record under NCT05881421.

Detailed description

Shockwave Medical Inc. intends to conduct a prospective, multi-center, single blind, randomized (1:1) study of Lithoplasty treatment used in combination with DCB versus standard balloon angioplasty used in combination with DCB to treat moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal arteries. The Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System is indicated for lithotripsy-enhanced, low-pressure balloon dilatation of calcified, stenotic peripheral arteries in patients who are candidates for percutaneous therapy. Up to 400 subjects at 60 sites in Europe, the United States and New Zealand. Subjects will be followed through discharge, 30 days, and 6, 12 and 24 months. DUS assessments will be completed at 12 and 24 months. Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting by angiographic core lab. Subjects who do not meet the randomized study inclusion and exclusion criteria, but meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the observational study may be enrolled in the observational study. The objective of the observational study is to assess the real-world acute performance of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System in the treatment of calcified, stenotic, peripheral arteries.The observational study is a prospective, multi-center, single arm observational study for subjects who do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the randomized study. A maximum of 1500 subjects at the same 60 sites will be enrolled in the observational study. Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting by angiographic core lab. Enrollment in the observational study is anticipated to last approximately 22 months. Subjects in the observational study will be followed through hospital discharge. Once enrollment in the randomized portion of the study is complete, subjects may continue to be enrolled in the observational study provided they meet OS eligibility criteria. Results for the observational study will be reported in a separate record under NCT05881421.

Interventions

DEVICEShockwave Lithoplasty® Peripheral Lithoplasty System

The Shockwave Lithoplasty® System is a proprietary lithotripsy-enhanced balloon catheter that is designed to be delivered through the peripheral arterial system of the lower extremities to the site of calcified stenosis. Activating the lithotripsy within the device will generate pulsatile mechanical energy within the target treatment site, disrupt calcium within the lesion and allow subsequent dilation of a peripheral artery stenosis using low balloon pressure. The system consists of a balloon catheter with multiple integrated lithotripsy electrodes, and a generator.

DRUGMedtronic IN.PACT (DCB)

The IN.PACT Admiral DCB is an over-the-wire (OTW) balloon catheter with a drug-coated balloon at the distal tip. The drug component, referred to as the FreePac™ drug coating, consists of the drug paclitaxel and the excipient urea. The device component physically dilates the vessel lumen by PTA, and the drug is intended to reduce the proliferative response that is associated with restenosis.

Sponsors

Shockwave Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Randomized Study Arm Eligibility Criteria General Inclusion Criteria 1. Subject is able and willing to comply with all assessments in the study. 2. Subject or subject's legal representative have been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate and has signed the approved consent form. 3. Age of subject is greater than or equal to 18. 4. Rutherford Clinical Category 2, 3, or 4 of the target limb. 5. Estimated life expectancy \>1 year. 6. Subject is a suitable candidate for angiography and endovascular intervention in the opinion of the investigator or per hospital guideline. 7. Subject is intended to undergo treatment with Lithoplasty followed by DCB, or DCB with standard balloon pre-dilatation. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria 8. Target lesion that is located in a native, de novo superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery (popliteal artery extends to and ends proximal to the ostium of the anterior tibial artery). 9. Target lesion reference vessel diameter is between 4.0mm and 7.0mm by visual estimate. 10. Target lesion is ≥70% stenosis by investigator via visual estimate. 11. Target lesion length is ≤180mm for lesions 70-99% stenosed. Target lesion can be all or part of the 180mm treated zone. 12. Chronic total occlusion, lesion length is ≤100mm of the total ≤180 mm target lesion. 13. Subject has at least one patent tibial vessel on the target leg with runoff to the foot, defined as no stenosis \>50%. 14. Calcification is at least moderate defined as presence of fluoroscopic evidence of calcification: 1) on parallel sides of the vessel and 2) extending \> 50% the length of the lesion if lesion is ≥50mm in length; or extending for minimum of 20mm if lesion is \<50mm in length. General

Exclusion criteria

1. Rutherford Clinical Category 0, 1, 5 and 6. 2. Subject has active infection requiring antibiotic therapy. 3. Planned target limb major amputation (above the ankle). 4. History of prior endovascular or surgical procedure on the index limb within the past 30 days or planned within 30 days of the index procedure. 5. Subject has a known coagulopathy or has bleeding diatheses, thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 100,000/microliter. 6. Subject in whom antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated. 7. Subject has known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention that cannot be adequately pre-treated. 8. Subject has known allergy to urethane, nylon, or silicone. 9. Myocardial infarction within 60 days prior to enrollment. 10. History of stroke within 60 days prior to enrollment. 11. History of thrombolytic therapy within two weeks of enrollment. 12. Subject has acute or chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine of \>2.5 mg/dL or \>220 umol/L, or on dialysis. 13. Subject is pregnant or nursing. 14. Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint. 15. Subject has other medical, social or psychological problems that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving this treatment, and the procedures and evaluations pre- and post-treatment. 16. The use of specialty balloons, re-entry or atherectomy devices. Angiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Procedural SuccessPeri-Procedural, approximately 2 hoursProcedural success is defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting by angiographic core lab.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success ABI30 daysDefined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 30 days as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.
Clinical Success Quality of Life30 daysDefined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 30 days as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied. It ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)30 days* Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb * Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle) * Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization * Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting
Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)30 daysAny revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI \>20% or \>0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion \>50% at the target lesion site
Number of Participants With Primary Patency12 monthsDefined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and freedom from restenosis determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram greater than or equal to 50% stenosis.
Clinical Success Rutherford Category30 daysDefined as Rutherford Category reported at 30 days as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.

Countries

Austria, Germany, New Zealand, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCB
Shockwave Lithoplasty® Peripheral Lithoplasty System is a lithotripsy-enhanced, low-pressure balloon dilatation of calcified, stenotic peripheral arteries in patients who are candidates for percutaneous therapy. lithoplasty Shockwave Lithoplasty® Peripheral Lithoplasty System: The Shockwave Lithoplasty® System is a proprietary lithotripsy-enhanced balloon catheter that is designed to be delivered through the peripheral arterial system of the lower extremities to the site of calcified stenosis. Activating the lithotripsy within the device will generate pulsatile mechanical energy within the target treatment site, disrupt calcium within the lesion and allow subsequent dilation of a peripheral artery stenosis using low balloon pressure. The system consists of a balloon catheter with multiple integrated lithotripsy electrodes, and a generator. Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB): The IN.PACT Admiral DCB is an over-the-wire (OTW) balloon catheter with a drug-coated balloon at the distal tip. The drug component, referred to as the FreePac™ drug coating, consists of the drug paclitaxel and the excipient urea. The device component physically dilates the vessel lumen by PTA, and the drug is intended to reduce the proliferative response that is associated with restenosis.
153
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)
Medronic IN.PACT Drug Coated Balloon (DBS) is indicated for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with obstructive disease of peripheral arteries, including patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) and arteriovenous (AV) access to help maintain hemodialysis access in patients with end-stage renal disease. Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB): The IN.PACT Admiral DCB is an over-the-wire (OTW) balloon catheter with a drug-coated balloon at the distal tip. The drug component, referred to as the FreePac™ drug coating, consists of the drug paclitaxel and the excipient urea. The device component physically dilates the vessel lumen by PTA, and the drug is intended to reduce the proliferative response that is associated with restenosis.
153
Total306

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLithoplasty System Followed by DCBTotalMedtronic IN.PACT (DCB)
Age, Continuous72.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
71.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
71.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants21 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
143 Participants276 Participants133 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
25 Participants49 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
39 Participants73 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 Participants168 Participants88 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants80 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
106 Participants226 Participants120 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
17 / 15312 / 153
other
Total, other adverse events
134 / 153135 / 153
serious
Total, serious adverse events
87 / 15391 / 153

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Procedural Success

Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting by angiographic core lab.

Time frame: Peri-Procedural, approximately 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Procedural Success96 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Procedural Success67 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Success ABI

Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 12 months as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success ABI.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success ABI.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Secondary

Clinical Success ABI

Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 6 months as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success ABI.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success ABI.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Secondary

Clinical Success ABI

Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 30 days as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success ABI.23 indexStandard Deviation 0.21
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success ABI.22 indexStandard Deviation 0.23
Secondary

Clinical Success ABI

Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 24 months as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success ABI.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success ABI.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Secondary

Clinical Success Quality of Life

Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 24 months as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied and ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Quality of Life.080 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.204
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Quality of Life.089 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.216
Secondary

Clinical Success Quality of Life

Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 30 days as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied. It ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Quality of Life.103 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.202
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Quality of Life.116 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.184
Secondary

Clinical Success Quality of Life

Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 6 months as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied and ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Quality of Life.118 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.194
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Quality of Life.089 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Clinical Success Quality of Life

Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 12 months as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied and ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Quality of Life.090 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.202
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Quality of Life.074 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.208
Secondary

Clinical Success Rutherford Category

Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 24 months as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Rutherford Category-2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Rutherford Category-2.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Secondary

Clinical Success Rutherford Category

Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 30 days as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Rutherford Category-2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Rutherford Category-2.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Secondary

Clinical Success Rutherford Category

Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 12 months as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Rutherford Category-2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Rutherford Category-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Secondary

Clinical Success Rutherford Category

Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 6 months as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBClinical Success Rutherford Category-2.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Clinical Success Rutherford Category-2.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI \>20% or \>0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion \>50% at the target lesion site

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)4 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI \>20% or \>0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion \>50% at the target lesion site

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)11 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI \>20% or \>0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion \>50% at the target lesion site

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)6 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI \>20% or \>0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion \>50% at the target lesion site

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)0 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)

* Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb * Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle) * Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization * Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)0 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)

* Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb * Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle) * Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization * Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)0 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)

* Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb * Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle) * Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization * Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)0 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)

* Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb * Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle) * Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization * Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)0 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Primary Patency

Defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and freedom from restenosis determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram greater than or equal to 50% stenosis.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Primary Patency81 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Primary Patency63 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Primary Patency

Defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and freedom from restenosis determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram greater than or equal to 50% stenosis.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lithoplasty System Followed by DCBNumber of Participants With Primary Patency99 Participants
Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)Number of Participants With Primary Patency87 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026