Skip to content

Study of Anaesthesia Costs and Recovery Profiles

Recovery Profiles and Costs in Sevoflurane and Propofol Based Anaesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02920749
Acronym
SACRP
Enrollment
120
Registered
2016-09-30
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2018-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaesthesia

Keywords

anaesthesia, costs, recovery profiles

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery profiles and cost containment of sevoflurane and propofol based general anesthesia for otorhinolaryngeal surgery.

Detailed description

Sevoflurane and propofol are two basic drugs in the maintenance of anaesthesia. In this study we compared the perioperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery profiles and cost containment of sevoflurane and propofol based general anaesthesia for otorhinolaryngeal surgery. Patients were equally divided into four anaesthetic subgroups. In groups A and C anaesthesia was based on sevoflurane or propofol, respectively, without bispectral index (BIS) and train-of-for monitor (TOF) monitoring. In groups B and D anaesthesia was based on sevoflurane or propofol, respectively, with BIS and TOF monitoring. Drug consumption, recovery profiles and anaesthesia costs were analysed. ECG, main arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, oxygen saturation of peripheral haemoglobin (SpO2), pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide was monitored continuously and registered at 5 min intervals during anaesthesia. Each group received propofol for anaesthesia induction. In group A and B anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, in groups C and D with propofol. In groups B and D the depth of anaesthesia (BIS® Quatro Brain Monitoring Sensor, Covidien) and the neuromuscular blocking status (Infinity®, Trident® NMT SmartPod®, Dräger Medical) were monitored too. BIS and TOF values were recorded at 5 min intervals.

Interventions

DRUGSevoflurane group A

In this group anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. Initial and maintenance fresh gas flow was 4 and 1 l/min, respectively. Sevoflurane dosing was adjusted for the same MAP range.

DRUGSevoflurane group B

In this group anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. Initial and maintenance fresh gas flow was 4 and 1 l/min, respectively. Sevoflurane dosing was set to maintain target BIS levels of 40 to 60 and MAP for controlled hypotension within 60-85 mmHg.

DRUGPropofol group C

In this group anaesthesia was maintained with propofol. Propofol was administered according to protocol. Propofol dosing was adjusted for the same MAP range.

DRUGPropofol group D

In this group anaesthesia was maintained with propofol. Propofol dosing was set to maintain target BIS levels of 40 to 60 and MAP for controlled hypotension within 60-85 mmHg.

Sponsors

University of Pecs
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status grade I or II who were scheduled for elective otorhinolaryngological surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with a history of bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, psychiatric illness, cerebrovascular or congenital neuromuscular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Drug Consumptionat induction one dose and during anaesthesia mg/1 hourdrugs of sevoflurane or total intravenous anaesthesia without or with BIS and TOF monitoring : fentanyl, sevoflurane, propofol 1%, atracurium in milligrams

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Costs of Anaesthesia1 hourtotal cost of drugs (midazolam, propofol 1%, sevoflurane, atracurium, diclofenac, nalbuphin and antidotes) and disposable cost in euros

Countries

Hungary

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In this study we compared the perioperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery profiles and cost containment of sevoflurane and propofol based general anaesthesia with controlled hypotension for otorhinolaryngeal surgery.

Pre-assignment details

We studied patients with ASA physical status I or II, their age between was between 18 and 65 years. Individuals with a history of pulmonary, psychiatric, cerebrovascular or congenital neuromuscular disease were excluded from the study. Patients were blocked randomised to one of four anaesthetic treatment groups with closed envelops.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A
General anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane.
30
Group B
Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and the depth of anaesthesia (BIS® Quatro Brain Monitoring Sensor, Covidien) and the neuromuscular blocking status (Infinity®, Trident® NMT SmartPod®, Dräger Medical) was monitored too.
30
Group C
General anaesthesia was maintained with propofol.
30
Group D
Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol and the depth of anaesthesia (BIS® Quatro Brain Monitoring Sensor, Covidien) and the neuromuscular blocking status (Infinity®, Trident® NMT SmartPod®, Dräger Medical) was monitored too.
30
Total120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGroup AGroup BGroup CGroup D
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
120 Participants30 Participants30 Participants30 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
120 participants30 participants30 participants30 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants14 Participants16 Participants19 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants16 Participants14 Participants11 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 3015 / 304 / 308 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 300 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Drug Consumption

drugs of sevoflurane or total intravenous anaesthesia without or with BIS and TOF monitoring : fentanyl, sevoflurane, propofol 1%, atracurium in milligrams

Time frame: at induction one dose and during anaesthesia mg/1 hour

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group ADrug Consumptionfentanyl at induction0.0983 mgStandard Deviation 0.0091
Group ADrug Consumptionpropofol during anesthesia0 mgStandard Deviation 0
Group ADrug Consumptionsevoflurane during anesthesia11400 mgStandard Deviation 2800
Group ADrug Consumptionpropofol at induction196.3 mgStandard Deviation 46.9
Group ADrug Consumptionatracurium during anaesthesia8.3 mgStandard Deviation 3.7
Group ADrug Consumptionatracurium at induction38.3 mgStandard Deviation 4.2
Group ADrug Consumptionfentanyl during anaesthesia0.0546 mgStandard Deviation 0.0269
Group BDrug Consumptionpropofol during anesthesia0 mgStandard Deviation 0
Group BDrug Consumptionfentanyl during anaesthesia0.0598 mgStandard Deviation 0.0389
Group BDrug Consumptionatracurium at induction37.3 mgStandard Deviation 6.7
Group BDrug Consumptionsevoflurane during anesthesia14800 mgStandard Deviation 12400
Group BDrug Consumptionatracurium during anaesthesia7.4 mgStandard Deviation 4.7
Group BDrug Consumptionpropofol at induction166.4 mgStandard Deviation 35.2
Group BDrug Consumptionfentanyl at induction0.1033 mgStandard Deviation 0.0183
Group CDrug Consumptionfentanyl during anaesthesia0.0898 mg
Group CDrug Consumptionfentanyl at induction0.0991 mgStandard Deviation 0.0046
Group CDrug Consumptionpropofol at induction194.3 mgStandard Deviation 18.9
Group CDrug Consumptionatracurium at induction36.0 mgStandard Deviation 5.7
Group CDrug Consumptionsevoflurane during anesthesia0 mgStandard Deviation 0
Group CDrug Consumptionpropofol during anesthesia1185.5 mgStandard Deviation 320.9
Group CDrug Consumptionatracurium during anaesthesia8.5 mgStandard Deviation 4.7
Group DDrug Consumptionatracurium at induction37.7 mgStandard Deviation 7
Group DDrug Consumptionatracurium during anaesthesia8.9 mgStandard Deviation 6.1
Group DDrug Consumptionpropofol during anesthesia1082.1 mgStandard Deviation 297.9
Group DDrug Consumptionpropofol at induction147.3 mgStandard Deviation 30.2
Group DDrug Consumptionfentanyl at induction0.0992 mgStandard Deviation 0.0103
Group DDrug Consumptionsevoflurane during anesthesia0 mgStandard Deviation 0
Group DDrug Consumptionfentanyl during anaesthesia0.0947 mgStandard Deviation 0.034
Comparison: Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS version 21 for Windows (IBM Corporation) software. All data are expressed as means ± SD. Mann-Whitney test was performed to assess the differences between patient subgroups.p-value: <0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Costs of Anaesthesia

total cost of drugs (midazolam, propofol 1%, sevoflurane, atracurium, diclofenac, nalbuphin and antidotes) and disposable cost in euros

Time frame: 1 hour

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group ACosts of Anaesthesiatotal drug cost8.84 eurosStandard Deviation 4.11
Group ACosts of Anaesthesiatotal cost of anaesthesia12.15 eurosStandard Deviation 5.32
Group ACosts of Anaesthesiatotal disposable cost6.49 eurosStandard Deviation 0.11
Group BCosts of Anaesthesiatotal drug cost7.86 eurosStandard Deviation 3.54
Group BCosts of Anaesthesiatotal cost of anaesthesia19.95 eurosStandard Deviation 8.53
Group BCosts of Anaesthesiatotal disposable cost23.25 eurosStandard Deviation 0.12
Group CCosts of Anaesthesiatotal disposable cost8.09 eurosStandard Deviation 0.07
Group CCosts of Anaesthesiatotal drug cost8.33 eurosStandard Deviation 3.02
Group CCosts of Anaesthesiatotal cost of anaesthesia13.23 eurosStandard Deviation 4.23
Group DCosts of Anaesthesiatotal drug cost7.52 eurosStandard Deviation 2.49
Group DCosts of Anaesthesiatotal cost of anaesthesia22.11 eurosStandard Deviation 8.08
Group DCosts of Anaesthesiatotal disposable cost24.76 eurosStandard Deviation 0.19
Comparison: Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS version 21 for Windows (IBM Corporation) software. All data are expressed as means ± SD. Mann-Whitney test was performed to assess the differences between patient subgroups.p-value: <0.05ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026