Skip to content

Pediatric Emergency Department Smartphone Otoscope Study (PED-Oto)

Pediatric Emergency Department Smartphone Otoscope Study (PED-Oto)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02918773
Enrollment
22
Registered
2016-09-29
Start date
2016-10-15
Completion date
2017-04-15
Last updated
2018-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Otitis Externa, Acute Otitis Media

Keywords

Pediatrics, Emergency Medicine, Ear infection

Brief summary

Acute otitis media (AOM), defined as acute inflammation in the middle ear, is a leading cause of health encounters and antimicrobial prescriptions in children worldwide. Diagnosis of AOM is often dependent on a brief view of the tympanic membrane in an uncooperative child's ear canal. As a consequence, AOM may be inappropriately diagnosed when visualization of the tympanic membrane (ear drum) is not optimal. Improved methods for visualizing the tympanic membrane including capturing still images and recording video of the ear exam would be beneficial in the diagnosis and management of otic complaints, including acute and chronic otitis media. Use of a smartphone otoscope has the potential to optimize clinician ability to manage otic complaints, visualize the tympanic membrane, and support antimicrobial stewardship. This study will be conducted as a randomized control study in two affiliated children's hospital emergency departments. Twenty volunteer clinicians will be randomly assigned to use either a smartphone otoscope or a conventional otoscope for all otic examinations for a 6-month period.

Detailed description

A smartphone otoscope (CellScope-Oto) is a pocket size attachment that employs the technology and light source of a smartphone to capture reproducible images of the ear canal and tympanic membrane. Previous studies with this device demonstrated that images taken with both the smartphone otoscope and a camera-fitted conventional analogue otoscope were equivalent with respect to image quality and that the smartphone otoscope was acceptable as an educational and diagnostic tool to health professional students. A pilot study with a similar design to this study conducted in two offices of an ambulatory pediatric clinic demonstrated a trend toward decreased antimicrobial prescription filling among families whose children were examined with the smartphone otoscope compared to those who were examined with a conventional otoscope. To further assess this trend, this study proposes an evaluation of the impact of device use on antimicrobial prescribing for children with an otic complaint in a pediatric emergency department (PED) setting. This study will enroll 20 clinicians for the 6-month study period; 10 who will be randomly assigned to use a smartphone otoscope for the 6-month study period and 10 who will be assigned to use a conventional otoscope for all otoscopic exams. Data will be abstracted via retrospective review of the electronic medical record of encounters in with an otoscopic exam was performed as part of the diagnostic evaluation.

Interventions

A smartphone otoscope is a pocket size smartphone attachment that uses the technology and light source of a smartphone to capture reproducible images of the ear canal and tympanic membrane. The smartphone otoscope has the capability to capture still images and video, which can be referred to post-examination as well as be incorporated into an electronic medical record. Clinicians will use the smartphone otoscope for the duration of the 6-month study period.

A conventional otoscope has a light and lenses to provide a view of the ear canal and tympanic membrane or eardrum. Clinicians will use the conventional otoscope for the duration of the 6-month study period.

Sponsors

Georgia Institute of Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
CollaboratorOTHER
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must be a pediatric emergency care clinicians providing care at an emergency department a participating children's hospital * Willing to agree to random assignment to either a smartphone otoscope device or a conventional otoscope device for the 6-month study period * Willing to log patient encounters that included the an otoscopic examination for non-traumatic indication for each shift * Willing to document and report episodes of care in which the assigned otoscopic device could not be used on a study-eligible otoscopic examination * Willing to complete an end of study assessment, if assigned to use the smartphone otoscope

Exclusion criteria

* Declines to give informed consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Antibiotic PrescriptionsMonth 6The number of emergency department encounters where antibiotics were prescribed to treat acute otitis media (AOM) are presented here. Information about antimicrobial prescriptions were found in the medical records of children receiving an otoscopic exam by a participating clinician.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Diagnoses of Acute Otitis Media (AOM)Month 6The number of emergency department encounters where a diagnosis of acute otitis media (AOM) was made is presented here. Information about the diagnosis of AOM was found in the medical records of children receiving an otoscopic exam by a participating clinician.
Number of Diagnoses of Otitis ExternaMonth 6The number of emergency department encounters where a diagnosis of otitis externa was made is presented here. Information about the diagnosis of otitis externa was found in the medical records of children receiving an otoscopic exam by a participating clinician.
Clinician Acceptability of the Smartphone Otoscopic DeviceMonth 6Clinicians randomized to use the smartphone otoscopic device completed a survey to assess the acceptability of this device compared to the historical use of a conventional otoscope. The survey, developed specifically for this study, asked clinicians to report on their preference for using the smartphone otoscope over the conventional otoscope, whether the device increased their ability to diagnose AOM, and the perceived impact on antibiotic prescribing.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Twenty-two volunteer clinicians were randomly assigned to use either a smartphone otoscope device or a conventional otoscope for a six-month period from October 15, 2016 to April 15, 2017. This study was conducted at two children's hospital emergency departments in Atlanta, Georgia.

Pre-assignment details

Study clinicians logged 1,502 encounters where otoscopes were used; 112 (7%) of encounters were excluded due to incomplete data or not meeting study inclusion criteria, for a total of 1390 encounters evaluated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Conventional Otoscope Encounters
Emergency department (ED) encounters by participating clinicians randomized to the conventional otoscope study arm. Clinicians randomized to this group used a conventional otoscope for a 6-month period for all otic (ear) examinations for any non-traumatic complaints with the potential for otic involvement including fever, ear pain, congestion, or runny nose.
11
Conventional Otoscope Encounters
Emergency department (ED) encounters by participating clinicians randomized to the conventional otoscope study arm. Clinicians randomized to this group used a conventional otoscope for a 6-month period for all otic (ear) examinations for any non-traumatic complaints with the potential for otic involvement including fever, ear pain, congestion, or runny nose.
776
Smartphone Otoscope Encounters
Emergency department (ED) encounters by participating clinicians randomized to the smartphone otoscope study arm. Clinicians randomized to this group used a smartphone otoscope for a 6-month period for all otic (ear) examinations for any non-traumatic complaints with the potential for otic involvement including fever, ear pain, congestion, or runny nose.
11
Smartphone Otoscope Encounters
Emergency department (ED) encounters by participating clinicians randomized to the smartphone otoscope study arm. Clinicians randomized to this group used a smartphone otoscope for a 6-month period for all otic (ear) examinations for any non-traumatic complaints with the potential for otic involvement including fever, ear pain, congestion, or runny nose.
614
Total1,412

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSmartphone Otoscope EncountersConventional Otoscope EncountersTotal
Age, Continuous49.0 age in months of encounter subjects
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42
43.5 age in months of encounter subjects
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.8
45.90 age in months of encounter subjects
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.34
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Reason for clinic visit
Congestion/runny nose
182 Emergency department encounters270 Emergency department encounters452 Emergency department encounters
Reason for clinic visit
Cough
274 Emergency department encounters365 Emergency department encounters639 Emergency department encounters
Reason for clinic visit
Ear pain
96 Emergency department encounters106 Emergency department encounters202 Emergency department encounters
Reason for clinic visit
Fever
424 Emergency department encounters522 Emergency department encounters946 Emergency department encounters
Reason for clinic visit
Other
317 Emergency department encounters338 Emergency department encounters655 Emergency department encounters
Region of Enrollment
United States
614 Emergency department encounters776 Emergency department encounters1390 Emergency department encounters
Sex/Gender, Customized
Not collected
614 Emergency department encounters776 Emergency department encounters1390 Emergency department encounters

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 7760 / 614
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7760 / 614
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 7760 / 614

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Antibiotic Prescriptions

The number of emergency department encounters where antibiotics were prescribed to treat acute otitis media (AOM) are presented here. Information about antimicrobial prescriptions were found in the medical records of children receiving an otoscopic exam by a participating clinician.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: This analysis includes emergency department encounters with children by a participating clinician where AOM was diagnosed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Conventional Otoscope EncountersNumber of Antibiotic PrescriptionsAntibiotic prescribed140 Emergency department encounters
Conventional Otoscope EncountersNumber of Antibiotic PrescriptionsAntibiotic not prescribed6 Emergency department encounters
Conventional Otoscope EncountersNumber of Antibiotic PrescriptionsUnknown0 Emergency department encounters
Smartphone Otoscope EncountersNumber of Antibiotic PrescriptionsAntibiotic not prescribed7 Emergency department encounters
Smartphone Otoscope EncountersNumber of Antibiotic PrescriptionsAntibiotic prescribed115 Emergency department encounters
Smartphone Otoscope EncountersNumber of Antibiotic PrescriptionsUnknown1 Emergency department encounters
Secondary

Clinician Acceptability of the Smartphone Otoscopic Device

Clinicians randomized to use the smartphone otoscopic device completed a survey to assess the acceptability of this device compared to the historical use of a conventional otoscope. The survey, developed specifically for this study, asked clinicians to report on their preference for using the smartphone otoscope over the conventional otoscope, whether the device increased their ability to diagnose AOM, and the perceived impact on antibiotic prescribing.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Only participating clinicians who were randomized to use the smartphone otoscope were administered a survey at the end of the 6-month intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conventional Otoscope EncountersClinician Acceptability of the Smartphone Otoscopic DevicePreferred smartphone over conventional otoscope8 Participants
Conventional Otoscope EncountersClinician Acceptability of the Smartphone Otoscopic DeviceSmartphone increased ability to diagnose AOM3 Participants
Conventional Otoscope EncountersClinician Acceptability of the Smartphone Otoscopic DeviceSmartphone did not impact antibiotic prescribing6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Diagnoses of Acute Otitis Media (AOM)

The number of emergency department encounters where a diagnosis of acute otitis media (AOM) was made is presented here. Information about the diagnosis of AOM was found in the medical records of children receiving an otoscopic exam by a participating clinician.

Time frame: Month 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Conventional Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Acute Otitis Media (AOM)AOM Diagnosed146 Emergency department encounters
Conventional Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Acute Otitis Media (AOM)AOM Not Diagnosed630 Emergency department encounters
Smartphone Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Acute Otitis Media (AOM)AOM Diagnosed123 Emergency department encounters
Smartphone Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Acute Otitis Media (AOM)AOM Not Diagnosed491 Emergency department encounters
Secondary

Number of Diagnoses of Otitis Externa

The number of emergency department encounters where a diagnosis of otitis externa was made is presented here. Information about the diagnosis of otitis externa was found in the medical records of children receiving an otoscopic exam by a participating clinician.

Time frame: Month 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Conventional Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Otitis ExternaOtitis Externa Diagnosed0 Emergency department encounters
Conventional Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Otitis ExternaOtitis Externa Not Diagnosed776 Emergency department encounters
Smartphone Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Otitis ExternaOtitis Externa Diagnosed0 Emergency department encounters
Smartphone Otoscope EncountersNumber of Diagnoses of Otitis ExternaOtitis Externa Not Diagnosed614 Emergency department encounters

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026