Skip to content

Fixation of Patellar Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Endobutton vs Metal Interference Screws

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Endobutton CL BTB Fixation System With Metal Interference Screws in the Femoral Fixation of Patellar Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02918734
Enrollment
220
Registered
2016-09-29
Start date
2016-10-01
Completion date
2033-03-01
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Injuries

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting

Brief summary

In this randomized controlled trial the investigators will compare the results after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using two different methods for femoral fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. Interference screws have been the standard method for fixing the femoral side of BPTB grafts; however, several pitfalls have been reported. Cortical fixation with the Endobutton CL BTB Fixation System has become available and the clinical results have been described as promising; however, no randomized controlled trials comparing these two femoral fixation methods have been conducted, and there is no published data that confirms that the bone block heals in the tunnel with the newer method. The aim of our study is to compare the outcome after primary ACL reconstruction with BPTB autografts using the Endobutton CL BTB or metal interference screw for femoral fixation.

Detailed description

Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts have recently been found to have a lower risk of revision compared with hamstring tendon autografts, and BPTB has again become our graft of choice. Interference screws have been the standard method for fixing the femoral side of a BPTB graft; however problems such as damage of the graft and failure due to nonparallel screw placement have been reported. Cortical fixation using a suspensory system has been used for soft-tissue graft fixation for several years, and a corresponding device, the Endobutton CL BTB Fixation System (Smith & Nephew, Inc., Andover, MA, USA), has become available for fixation of bone-tendon-bone grafts. The clinical results after fixation with the Endobutton CL BTB have been described as promising; however, no randomized controlled trials comparing these two fixation methods have been conducted, and there is no published data that confirms that the bone block heals in the tunnel with the newer method. In this randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction will be randomized into either an Endobutton group or an interference screw group. The primary aim of the study is to compare these two fixation methods, assessed by patient reported outcomes, laxity, range of motion and muscle strength. Knee related quality of life 2 years after surgery is the primary outcome, measured by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale "knee related Quality of life (QOL)". Other aims are to see if there is any difference in the integration of the bone block in the femoral tunnel assessed by CT scan, in the risk of developing osteoarthritis assessed by radiographs, or in the risk of a postoperative complication or revision. The patients will be followed up 6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years and 10 years after surgery. CT scan will be performed after 6 months, and radiographs after 2 years and 10 years. In addition details of the rehabilitation will be recorded. Patients undergoing a revision will be followed up but excluded from further comparisons in the study. Our hypothesis is that there is no difference in the outcome after primary ACL reconstruction with BPTB autografts using the Endobutton CL BTB or metal interference screw for femoral fixation, both with a metal interference screw for the tibial fixation.

Interventions

DEVICEEndobutton CL BTB

ACL reconstruction with Endobutton CL BTB

DEVICEMetal interference screw

ACL reconstruction with metal interference screw

Sponsors

St. Olavs Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Rosenborgklinikken
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary reconstruction of ACL ruptures * Surgery at least 6 weeks after injury * The patient must accept and sign the informed consent form before surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Medical indication for using another graft than BPTB autograft (such as history of anterior knee pain or occupations etc. requiring frequent kneeling) * Previous major surgical procedures in the same knee * Major additional injuries in the knee (posterior cruciate ligament, lateral collateral ligament, medial collateral ligament, sutured meniscus lesions and major cartilage lesions undergoing cartilage repair) * Contralateral ACL injury (treated or untreated) * Present or former serious illness that makes follow-up or rehabilitation difficult (e.g. alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric disease)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee related quality of life2 yearsKOOS subscale "knee related Quality of life (QOL)"

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tegner activity scale6 months, 2 years, 10 years
Lachman test6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 10 yearsAnterior translation of the tibia
Muscular strength6 months, 2 years, 10 yearsBiodex dynamometer
Bone block integration6 monthsCT scan
Osteoarthritis2 years, 10 yearsX-ray radiographs
Range of motion6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 10 years
Knee related quality of life6 weeksKOOS subscale "knee related Quality of life (QOL)"
Lysholm functional knee score6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 10 years
KOOS6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 10 yearsKnee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Pivot shift test6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 10 yearsAnteroposterior and rotational stability
KT-1000 arthrometer6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 10 yearsAnterior translation of the tibia

Countries

Norway

Contacts

CONTACTTrond Olav Lundemo, md
TrondOlav.Lundemo@helse-nordtrondelag.no
CONTACTTone Gifstad, md phd
tone.gifstad@stolav.no
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJon Olav Drogset, md phd

St. Olavs Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026