Skip to content

Comparison of Two Strategies for Counseling Skin Examination and Sun Protection in First-degree Relatives of Patients With Melanoma

Written Advice to Improve Compliance With Early Detection of Melanoma in First-degree Relatives: a Multicenter, Cluster-randomized Intervention Trial to Evaluate the Impact of Specific Incentives and Study Psychological Determinants of Early Melanoma Detection Behavior in First-degree Relatives

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02917473
Acronym
FADEMELA
Enrollment
420
Registered
2016-09-28
Start date
2017-12-13
Completion date
2019-07-10
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma, Screening

Keywords

Medical skin examination, Skin Self Examination, Sun protection

Brief summary

First-degree relatives of patients with melanoma have a greater risk of developing melanoma. Patients are advised orally to inform their first-degree relatives that they should protect their skin from UV radiation and ask for a skin examination from a general practitioner or dermatologist. The study will evaluate the effectiveness of a written sheet in addition to the usual oral counselling to increase acceptance of skin examination by the first-degree relatives. If effective, written counselling provided to the patient for relatives should be recommended and generalized.

Detailed description

Melanoma (MM) is a common cancer affecting 11,000 new cases per year in France and the incidence has tripled in 30 years. It now includes young people, and is responsible for 1600 deaths /year in France. Greater tumor thickness and delayed diagnosis are associated with higher mortality. Prevention and early detection on a large scale in the general population are effective but expensive. First-degree relatives have a greater risk of developing MM. A study carried out in the USA found that a biennial consultation is justified and cost-effective in first-degree relatives of MM patients. The best way to deliver the message of sun protection and screening by a dermatologist, and the reality of behavioural changes induced by counseling and the psychological determinants of adherence to medical skin examination are not fully understood. A pilot study performed in our center suggested the value of a short written advice provided for participants to give to their relatives to promote sun protection and medical skin examination. The participants reported a significant increase in interest in medical skin examination by their relatives (p=0.006), but the investigators do not know whether the relatives really consulted for examination. The aim of the multicenter cluster-randomized study is to demonstrate that a higher ratio of relatives will in fact consult their GP or dermatologist for skin examination in the centers randomized to the intervention arm, i.e advice leaflet and usual oral counselling, compared to the centers randomized in the control arm, i.e. usual oral counselling. Participants and their relatives in the intervention group will be asked to undergo psychological tests to identify potential barriers to skin examination and sun protection. If effective, the investigators expect to improve the written information and to generalize its distribution at national level.

Interventions

In-person counseling Sun protection

BEHAVIORALWritten advice

Written advice

BEHAVIORALMedical skin screening

Medical skin screening

Sponsors

Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, CIC 1415, TOURS
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, U930,TOURS
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institut d'Enseignement à Distance,University Paris - 8
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Tours
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For Patients: * Personal history of Stage 0 through IIB melanoma * At maximum of 12 weeks after surgical treatment of Stage 0 through IIA melanoma * Have at least one first-degree relative * Speaking and reading French * Affiliated to the French Health Insurance system * Signed non-opposition form at the 1 year consultation For 1st degree relatives: * To be 1st degree related to a patient with melanoma * Speaking and reading French * 1st degree relatives informed by patients and agreeing to fill out the psychological questionnaires and to the use of their personal data by the investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Consulting general practitioner or dermatologist1 yearThe number of relatives who will have consulted a dermatologist or a general practitioner to perform whole body skin examination

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-skin examination reported by the relatives1 yearThe number of relatives who declare to have performed Self-skin examination.
Sun protection behaviors reported by the relatives1 yearSun protection behaviours reported by the relatives and assessed by a questionnaire
Barriers to skin examination identified from psychological questionnaires in patients and their relatives1 yearPsychological barriers of patients and their relatives to skin examination evaluated with several questionnaires and scales.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026