Skip to content

Injection of Corticoids for the Treatment of Acute Sprains of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers.

Randomized Controlled Prospective Study on the Injection of Corticoids for the Treatment of Acute Sprains of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers (Thumb Excluded).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02916940
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-09-28
Start date
2016-11-16
Completion date
2020-02-11
Last updated
2020-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sprain

Keywords

sprains of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the long fingers, Diprophos

Brief summary

There is currently no real consensus on the optimal management of acute sprains of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the long fingers. The aim of this study is to assess the beneficial effect of an injection of corticosteroids for the treatment of this type of sprain (one single sub-cutaneous injection, in the acute phase). This treatment, if effective, might become the treatment of choice for these types of injuries, instead of a prolonged immobilization or a careful early mobilization.

Interventions

DRUGDiprophos

Single subcutaneous injection of Diprophos, in the acute phase.

Sponsors

Brugmann University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults over 18 years old * Type I and II and III of the Eaton classification (except if fracture/luxation with more than 50% of the articular surface injured) * Trauma of one articulation only * Consultation within 2 weeks of trauma

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under 18 years old and over 80 years old * Pregnant/nursing women * Eaton classification Type II with a fracture affecting more than 50% of the articular surface, or persistant instability after reduction. * Open wounds, nerve lesion with sensitive issue and any wound needing a surgical intervention * Underlying pathologies: rhumatological, neurological, congenital (giving hyperextensive articulations as a result) * Corticoids allergy * Infection within the treated zone * Trauma antecedents at the level of the tendons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flexion/extension deficitBaseline (day of kenacort injection)Evaluation of the maximal amplitude of the articulation, as measured by a goniometer.
Laxity in hyperextensionBaseline (day of kenacort injection)Evaluation of the maximal amplitude of the articulation, as measured by a goniometer.
Diameter of the articulationBaseline (day of kenacort injection)Oedema evaluation. Collateral comparison with the same finger of the other hand: result expressed as a ratio
Prehension forceBaseline (day of kenacort injection)Assessed by a dynamometer (Jamar hydraulic gauge). Result expressed as a ratio with the prehension force of the non-injured hand.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mini-DASH7 days after injectionAssessment of the return to daily life activities or sport activities. Questionnaire of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand.
Mitchigan Hand Questionnaire7 days after injectionAuto-evaluation of the patient regarding the functionality of his/her articulation
EVA scale7 days after injectionPain assessment at the level of the volar plate

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026