Injuries, Spinal Cord
Conditions
Keywords
Sit-to-stand, Walking devices
Brief summary
1. Were there differences in functional ability between ambulatory individuals with SCI who passed and failed the independent sit-to-stand (iSTS) task? 2. Did the ability of iSTS relate to ability of walking as determined using a type of AAD used? 3. What were factors associated with the ability of iSTS?
Detailed description
* To evaluate the proportion and compare functional abilities between subjects who passed and failed the independent sit-to-stand (iSTS) task. * To assess the relationship between ability of iSTS and types of AAD used. * To investigate factors associated with the ability of iSTS.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Ambulatory patients with iSCI from both non-traumatic and traumatic causes * Aged at least 18 years * Who are able to walk independently with or without AADs at least 15 meters continuously \[FIM locomotor (FIM-L) scores = 5 to 7\]
Exclusion criteria
* Any patients with conditions that might affect ambulatory ability; such as brain function disorders, visual deficits, musculoskeletal pain (VAS \> 5), deformity of the musculoskeletal system, unable to follow a command of the tests, unstable medical conditions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Independent sit-to-stand test | 1 day | Ability to perform sit-to-stand independently |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lower limb support during sit-to-stand test | 1 day | Percent of body-weight support during sit-to-stand performance |
| Timed up and go test | 1 day | Ability of dynamic balance control |