Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Combined Phase 2b/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02914522
Acronym
SELECTION
Enrollment
1351
Registered
2016-09-26
Start date
2016-11-14
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2021-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of filgotinib in the induction and maintenance treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in participants who are biologic-naive and biologic-experienced. Participants who complete the study, or met protocol specified efficacy discontinuation criteria will have the option to enter a separate, long-term extension (LTE) study (Gilead Study GS-US-418-3899: NCT02914535).

Interventions

DRUGFilgotinib

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

DRUGPTM filgotinib

Tablet(s) administered orally once daily

Sponsors

Galapagos NV
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females, ages 18 to 75 years, inclusive based on the date of the screening visit * Documented diagnosis of UC of at least 6 months AND with a minimum disease extent of 15 cm from the anal verge. Documentation should include endoscopic and histopathologic evidence of UC. * A surveillance colonoscopy is required at screening in individuals with a history of UC for 8 or more years, if one was not performed in the prior 24 months * Moderately to severely active UC * Previously demonstrated an inadequate clinical response, loss of response to, or intolerance to at least 1 of the following agents (depending on current country treatment recommendations/guidelines): corticosteroids, immunomodulators, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa) antagonists, or vedolizumab Key

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of Crohn's disease, indeterminate colitis, ischemic colitis, fulminant colitis, ulcerative proctitis, or toxic mega-colon * Active tuberculosis (TB) or history of latent TB that has not been treated * Use of any concomitant prohibited medications as described in the protocol Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Week 10EBS remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; rectal bleeding subscore of 0; and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes; stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal. Total score for EBS ranged from 0 to 9 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58Week 58EBS remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; rectal bleeding subscore of 0; and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes; stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal. Total score for EBS ranged from 0 to 9 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 10Week 10Geboes histologic remission was assessed using the Geboes histologic scores for evaluation of disease severity in ulcerative colitis and classifies histologic changes. Remission was defined as having Grade 0 of \<= 0.3, Grade 1 of \<= 1.1, Grade 2A of \<= 2A.3, Grade 2B of 2B.0, Grade 3 of 3.0, Grade 4 of 4.0, and Grade 5 of 5.0. Possible scores are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0.0=No abnormality to 0.3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (1.0=No increase to 1.3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: Eosinophils in lamina propria (2A.0=No increase to 2A.3-=Marked increase; Grade 2B: Neutrophils in lamina propria (2B.0= No increase to 2B.3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (3.0=None to 3.3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction (4.0=none to 4.3=Unequivocal crypt destruction), and Grade 5: Erosions and ulcerations: (5.0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 5.4=Ulcer or granulation tissue).
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 10Week 10MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as having rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and PGA subscores of 0 and an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; overall MCS of ≤ 1. MCS possible subscores: rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease), and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Induction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.
Induction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum observed concentration of drug.
Induction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10AUCtau is defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).
Induction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration.
Induction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Ctau is defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval.
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 10Week 10MCS remission was defined as having a MCS of 2 or less and no single subscore higher than 1. The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and physician's global assessment (PGA). The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained EBS Remission at Week 58Week 58Sustained EBS remission was defined as having achieved EBS remission at both Weeks 10 and 58.
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 6-Month Corticosteroid-Free EBS Remission at Week 58Week 58Six-month corticosteroid-free EBS remission at Week 58 was defined as achieving EBS remission with no corticosteroid use for the indication of ulcerative colitis for at least 6 months prior to Week 58.
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Weeks 58Week 58Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 58Week 58Geboes histologic remission was assessed using the Geboes histologic scores for evaluation of disease severity in ulcerative colitis and classifies histologic changes. Remission was defined as having Grade 0 of \<= 0.3, Grade 1 of \<= 1.1, Grade 2A of \<= 2A.3, Grade 2B of 2B.0, Grade 3 of 3.0, Grade 4 of 4.0, and Grade 5 of 5.0. Possible scores are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0.0=No abnormality to 0.3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (1.0=No increase to 1.3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: Eosinophils in lamina propria (2A.0=No increase to 2A.3-=Marked increase; Grade 2B: Neutrophils in lamina propria (2B.0= No increase to 2B.3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (3.0=None to 3.3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction (4.0=none to 4.3=Unequivocal crypt destruction), and Grade 5: Erosions and ulcerations: (5.0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 5.4=Ulcer or granulation tissue).
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 58Week 58MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as having rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and PGA subscores of 0 and an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; overall MCS of ≤ 1. MCS possible subscores: rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease), and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Maintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Week 26 (any Time) and Week 58 (predose)Plasma concentration is defined as the measured drug concentration of filgotinib and its metabolite GS-829845. Lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was defined as 1 ng/mL for analyte filgotinib and 2 ng/mL for analyte GS-829845.
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 58Week 58MCS remission was defined as having a MCS of 2 or less and no single subscore higher than 1. The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA. The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 10Week 10Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in Australia, New Zealand, North America, South America, Asia and Europe. The first participant was screened on 14 November 2016. The last study visit occurred on 31 March 2020.

Pre-assignment details

2040 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mg
Participants in Cohort A (biologic-naive) received filgotinib 200 mg and PTM filgotinib 100 mg orally once daily for 10 weeks.
245
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mg
Participants in Cohort A (biologic-naive) received filgotinib 100 mg and PTM filgotinib 200 mg orally once daily for 10 weeks.
277
Induction Study (Cohort A): Placebo
Participants in Cohort A (biologic-naive) received PTM filgotinib 200 mg and PTM filgotinib 100 mg orally once daily for 10 weeks.
137
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mg
Participants in Cohort B (biologic-experienced) received filgotinib 200 mg and PTM filgotinib 100 mg orally once daily for 10 weeks.
262
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mg
Participants in Cohort B (biologic-experienced) received filgotinib 100 mg and PTM filgotinib 200 mg orally once daily for 10 weeks.
285
Induction Study (Cohort B): Placebo
Participants in Cohort B (biologic-experienced) received PTM filgotinib 200 mg and PTM filgotinib 100 mg orally once daily for 10 weeks.
142
Total1,348

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Adverse Event56418141000000
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Did not Receive Study Drug01001100000
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Investigator's Discretion00001000000
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Lost to Follow-up02110000000
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Non-compliance With Study Drug10000000000
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Pregnancy00001000000
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Protocol Violation02134200000
Induction Study: Up to Week 11Withdrew Consent411463300000
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Adverse Event000000721043
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Death00000020000
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Investigator's Discretion00000001200
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Non-compliance With Study Drug00000000010
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Pregnancy00000000120
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Protocol-specified Disease Worsening0000003449533921
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Protocol Violation00000055301
Maintenance Study: Week 11 to Week 58Withdrew Consent00000041634

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study (Cohort B): PlaceboInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgTotalInduction Study (Cohort A): Placebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
11 Participants16 Participants14 Participants21 Participants19 Participants89 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
234 Participants261 Participants128 Participants264 Participants243 Participants1259 Participants129 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants6 Participants4 Participants8 Participants8 Participants35 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
238 Participants269 Participants134 Participants273 Participants249 Participants1297 Participants134 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Permitted
1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants16 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
77 Participants79 Participants27 Participants51 Participants50 Participants322 Participants38 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants4 Participants19 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Permitted
0 Participants1 Participants13 Participants16 Participants18 Participants49 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
165 Participants192 Participants98 Participants212 Participants190 Participants952 Participants95 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
6 Participants3 Participants2 Participants8 Participants10 Participants30 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants7 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants14 Participants16 Participants36 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants17 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
3 Participants4 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants17 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 Participants1 Participants19 Participants26 Participants32 Participants80 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 Participants3 Participants9 Participants26 Participants31 Participants70 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
9 Participants8 Participants2 Participants5 Participants0 Participants27 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
55 Participants49 Participants3 Participants3 Participants8 Participants145 Participants27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants5 Participants11 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
4 Participants6 Participants12 Participants19 Participants15 Participants57 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
15 Participants16 Participants14 Participants29 Participants29 Participants109 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants10 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
57 Participants56 Participants11 Participants22 Participants17 Participants188 Participants25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants3 Participants19 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
21 Participants10 Participants1 Participants9 Participants6 Participants59 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
1 Participants7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants5 Participants32 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants8 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
0 Participants0 Participants7 Participants5 Participants7 Participants19 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants12 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
33 Participants46 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants106 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
7 Participants3 Participants7 Participants11 Participants12 Participants40 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants33 Participants21 Participants58 Participants36 Participants181 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
122 Participants120 Participants56 Participants99 Participants114 Participants561 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
123 Participants157 Participants86 Participants186 Participants148 Participants787 Participants87 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2450 / 2780 / 1370 / 2620 / 2860 / 1432 / 2020 / 990 / 1790 / 910 / 93
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 24543 / 27720 / 13783 / 26277 / 28555 / 14267 / 20233 / 9953 / 17933 / 9126 / 93
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 24513 / 2774 / 13719 / 26215 / 2859 / 1429 / 2020 / 998 / 1797 / 914 / 93

Outcome results

Primary

Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10

EBS remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; rectal bleeding subscore of 0; and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes; stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal. Total score for EBS ranged from 0 to 9 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 10

Population: Full Analysis Set for the Induction study (Cohorts A and B) included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug in the corresponding Induction study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 1026.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 1019.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 1015.3 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 1011.5 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 109.5 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 104.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.015795% CI: [2.1, 19.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.337995% CI: [-4.3, 12]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.010395% CI: [1.6, 12.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.064595% CI: [0, 10.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58

EBS remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; rectal bleeding subscore of 0; and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes; stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal. Total score for EBS ranged from 0 to 9 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 58

Population: Full Analysis Set for the Maintenance Study included all participants randomized to either the filgotinib 200 mg or filgotinib 100 mg treatment groups in the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) who achieved EBS remission or MCS response at Week 10, were rerandomized, and took at least 1 dose of study drug in the Maintenance Study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 5837.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 5811.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 5823.8 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 5813.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16, 35.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.04295% CI: [0, 20.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 10

Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Time frame: Week 10

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 1012.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 105.8 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 103.6 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 103.4 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 102.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 102.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.004795% CI: [2.9, 14.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.349595% CI: [-2.6, 6.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.426995% CI: [-2.5, 5.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.998795% CI: [-3.4, 3.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 10

Geboes histologic remission was assessed using the Geboes histologic scores for evaluation of disease severity in ulcerative colitis and classifies histologic changes. Remission was defined as having Grade 0 of \<= 0.3, Grade 1 of \<= 1.1, Grade 2A of \<= 2A.3, Grade 2B of 2B.0, Grade 3 of 3.0, Grade 4 of 4.0, and Grade 5 of 5.0. Possible scores are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0.0=No abnormality to 0.3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (1.0=No increase to 1.3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: Eosinophils in lamina propria (2A.0=No increase to 2A.3-=Marked increase; Grade 2B: Neutrophils in lamina propria (2B.0= No increase to 2B.3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (3.0=None to 3.3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction (4.0=none to 4.3=Unequivocal crypt destruction), and Grade 5: Erosions and ulcerations: (5.0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 5.4=Ulcer or granulation tissue).

Time frame: Week 10

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 1035.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 1023.8 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 1016.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 1019.8 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 1013.7 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 108.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [9.9, 28.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.067295% CI: [-0.7, 16.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.001995% CI: [4.2, 18.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.128695% CI: [-1.4, 11.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 10

MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as having rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and PGA subscores of 0 and an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; overall MCS of ≤ 1. MCS possible subscores: rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease), and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 10

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 1012.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 108.7 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 104.4 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 103.8 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 102.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 102.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.010595% CI: [1.9, 13.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.106295% CI: [-1, 9.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.308495% CI: [-2.2, 5.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.910995% CI: [-3.4, 3.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 10

MCS remission was defined as having a MCS of 2 or less and no single subscore higher than 1. The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and physician's global assessment (PGA). The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 10

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 1024.5 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 1017.0 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 1012.4 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 109.5 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 106.0 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): PlaceboInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 104.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.005395% CI: [3.8, 20.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.229595% CI: [-3.1, 12.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.039395% CI: [-0.1, 10.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.530895% CI: [-3.1, 6.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Induction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845

Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10

Population: PK Substudy Analysis Set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of filgotinib, participated in the PK substudy, and had at least 1 nonmissing intensive concentration value for filgotinib and/or GS-829845 with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib1746.3 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1244.05
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298453227.5 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1204.5
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298451812.2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 701.46
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib725.1 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 313.36
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib2283.3 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1012.03
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298454373.3 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1121.58
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib977.9 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 403.51
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298452002.9 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 598.73
Secondary

Induction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984

AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10

Population: Participants in the PK Substudy Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib5537.3 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1900.93
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984560938.4 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 6961.77
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984530643.2 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 12935.37
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib1881.9 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 797.51
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib6743.1 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1743.68
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984579286.3 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 27968.49
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib2420.3 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 837.26
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984534385.6 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 15160.15
Secondary

Induction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984

AUCtau is defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).

Time frame: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10

Population: Participants in the PK Substudy Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984557982.0 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 17767.52
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib5501.3 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1956.39
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984531187.9 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11858.78
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib1909.3 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 788.13
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib6475.6 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1643
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984580208.6 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 25096.57
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-82984536075.6 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13396.86
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib2492.3 hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 852.52
Secondary

Induction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984

Ctau is defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10

Population: Participants in the PK Substudy Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib12.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.74
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-8298452050.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 493.66
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-829845934.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 372.68
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib4.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.61
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib36.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 79.06
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-8298452581.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 777.07
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Filgotinib4.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.05
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Ctau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Metabolite GS-8298451062.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 463.67
Secondary

Induction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845

Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum observed concentration of drug.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10

Population: Participants in the PK Substudy Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib1.50 hour (h)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298453.76 hour (h)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298453.00 hour (h)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib0.75 hour (h)
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib1.00 hour (h)
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298453.02 hour (h)
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib0.57 hour (h)
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-8298453.00 hour (h)
Secondary

Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 6-Month Corticosteroid-Free EBS Remission at Week 58

Six-month corticosteroid-free EBS remission at Week 58 was defined as achieving EBS remission with no corticosteroid use for the indication of ulcerative colitis for at least 6 months prior to Week 58.

Time frame: Week 58

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set who were on corticosteroids at Maintenance Study baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 6-Month Corticosteroid-Free EBS Remission at Week 5827.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 6-Month Corticosteroid-Free EBS Remission at Week 586.4 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 6-Month Corticosteroid-Free EBS Remission at Week 5813.6 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 6-Month Corticosteroid-Free EBS Remission at Week 585.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.005595% CI: [7.7, 33.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.126595% CI: [-4.2, 20.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Weeks 58

Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Time frame: Week 58

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Maintenance Study were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Weeks 5815.6 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Weeks 586.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Weeks 5813.4 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Weeks 587.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.015795% CI: [1.8, 17.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.180895% CI: [-2.9, 13.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 58

Geboes histologic remission was assessed using the Geboes histologic scores for evaluation of disease severity in ulcerative colitis and classifies histologic changes. Remission was defined as having Grade 0 of \<= 0.3, Grade 1 of \<= 1.1, Grade 2A of \<= 2A.3, Grade 2B of 2B.0, Grade 3 of 3.0, Grade 4 of 4.0, and Grade 5 of 5.0. Possible scores are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0.0=No abnormality to 0.3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (1.0=No increase to 1.3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: Eosinophils in lamina propria (2A.0=No increase to 2A.3-=Marked increase; Grade 2B: Neutrophils in lamina propria (2B.0= No increase to 2B.3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (3.0=None to 3.3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction (4.0=none to 4.3=Unequivocal crypt destruction), and Grade 5: Erosions and ulcerations: (5.0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 5.4=Ulcer or granulation tissue).

Time frame: Week 58

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Maintenance Study were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 5838.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 5813.3 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 5827.9 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 5818.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.6, 35.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.052195% CI: [-1.3, 21.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 58

MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as having rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and PGA subscores of 0 and an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; overall MCS of ≤ 1. MCS possible subscores: rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease), and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 58

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Maintenance Study were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 5822.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 586.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 5812.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 587.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.000595% CI: [7.8, 24.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.294695% CI: [-3.9, 12.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 58

MCS remission was defined as having a MCS of 2 or less and no single subscore higher than 1. The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA. The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 58

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Maintenance Study were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 5834.7 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 589.2 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 5822.7 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 5813.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16, 35]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.065895% CI: [-1.1, 19.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained EBS Remission at Week 58

Sustained EBS remission was defined as having achieved EBS remission at both Weeks 10 and 58.

Time frame: Week 58

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Maintenance Study were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained EBS Remission at Week 5818.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained EBS Remission at Week 585.1 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort A): PlaceboMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained EBS Remission at Week 588.7 percentage of participants
Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained EBS Remission at Week 587.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.002495% CI: [5.3, 20.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.795195% CI: [-7, 8.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845

Plasma concentration is defined as the measured drug concentration of filgotinib and its metabolite GS-829845. Lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was defined as 1 ng/mL for analyte filgotinib and 2 ng/mL for analyte GS-829845.

Time frame: Week 26 (any Time) and Week 58 (predose)

Population: PK Analysis Set included all participants in the Safety Analysis Set who who took at least 1 dose of filgotinib and had at least 1 nonmissing plasma concentration value for filgotinib and/or its metabolite GS-829845 with available data were analyzed. Data was not collected for the Maintenance Study Placebo arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib: Week 268.5 ng/mL
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib: Week 583.9 ng/mL
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-829845: Week 262495.0 ng/mL
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-829845: Week 581930.0 ng/mL
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-829845: Week 58973.5 ng/mL
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib: Week 264.4 ng/mL
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Metabolite GS-829845: Week 261180.0 ng/mL
Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mgMaintenance Study: Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Filgotinib: Week 584.1 ng/mL

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026