Skip to content

Latarjet Versus Modified Eden-Hybinette for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

Randomized Trial for the Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder: Latarjet Versus Modified Eden-Hybinette

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02913352
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-09-23
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Dislocation

Brief summary

Randomized clinical trial, parallel 1:1, comparing Latarjet to Modified Eden-Hybinette (iliac bone crest + capsular repair) for recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation.

Detailed description

The Latarjet technique has proven reliable for the treatment of dislocations, with lower recurrence rates (5%) even in the presence of bone lesions. This technique allows a stable fixation of the graft, with 2 screws, and the dynamic effect of the conjoint tendon, the sling effect. However, several complications are described, such as neurological injuries, nonunion and graft resorption. Hamel et al, showed that vascularization of the coracoid graft is impaired during the course of Latarjet procedure. Together with the small thickness of the coracoid, it may justify its high rate of resorption. The Eden-Hybinette surgery does not have the potential advantages of the sling effect. However, it allows a better restoration of the area of the glenoid, without the risks related to the coracoid osteotomy. All clinical studies about the different bone grafting techniques have a low quality. Furthermore, there is no comparative study of the techniques of Latarjet and Eden-Hybinette.

Interventions

Open anterior glenoid bone graft from coracoid process

PROCEDUREModified Eden-Hybinette

Open anterior glenoid bone graft from iliac bone crest, with capsular suture and screw fixation

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER
Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of one or more previous episodes of traumatic glenohumeral dislocation; * Anterior glenoid bone loss superior to 20% of its diameter, regardless of the ISIS score; * Recurrence of glenohumeral dislocation in cases previously treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair, regardless of the ISIS score and severity of bone lesion of the glenoid; * Borderline bipolar bone lesions: * Instability Severity Index Score of (ISIS) greater than or equal to 4 points, with anterior glenoid bone loss (bone Bankart lesion) greater than 13.5% of their diameter, measured by the method described by Sugaya et al.; * Hill-Sachs lesion and glenoid considered "off-track".

Exclusion criteria

* Hill-Sachs lesion greater than 40% of the humeral head diameter (measured by the preoperative CT); * Untreated seizures; * Previously diagnosed rotator cuff complete tear; * Fractures of the proximal humerus (except for Hill-Sachs lesions); * Multidirectional instability; * Advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis (grade 3 Samilson and Pietro)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)2 yearsInstability score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic evaluation2 yearsGraft union, graft position and resorption
Kible scale for Scapular movement2 yearsScale for scapular positioning. Clinical measurement
Degree of Shoulder Involvement in Sports (DOSIS ) scale2 yearsreturn to sport scale
Categoric evaluation for scapular movement2 yearsVideo evaluation for normal or dyskinesis of the scapula movement
Rate of complications and reoperations2 years
ROWE score2 years
Visual analog scale (VAS) for shoulder pain2 years
VAS for iliac pain6 weeks
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)2 years
Tomographic evaluation2 yearsGraft union, graft position and resorption
Dislocation recurrence rate2 years

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

CONTACTMauro EC Gracitelli, PhD
mgracitelli@gmail.com+55 11 2661-2486
CONTACTEduardo A Malavolta, PhD
eduardomalavolta@gmail.com+55 11 2661-2486

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026