Skip to content

Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?

Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02913027
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-09-23
Start date
2016-09-05
Completion date
2017-03-30
Last updated
2017-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate patients self-reported comfort levels during each section of the pelvic exam.

Detailed description

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the sequence in which physicians perform the pelvic exam, describe and compare the self-reported comfort during each section of the pelvic exam and how comfort during the exam relates to quality of life, self-esteem, and sexual function in English speaking females at least 18 years of age in an outpatient setting.

Interventions

OTHERExternal Exam

The pelvic exam will be completed in the following order: external, speculum, bimanual exam in the Standard group. In the Experimental group the pelvic exam will be done with external exam, bimanual exam, then speculum exam.

OTHERBimanual Exam
OTHERSpeculum Exam

Sponsors

Philadelphia Urosurgical Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English-speaking, female patients * Are able to can read and write English * Are utilizing outpatient services at an OBGYN outpatient office * Are scheduled for a well-woman exam

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking patients * Patients who cannot read or write * Those who are pregnant * Have an active vaginal infection * Patients who, otherwise, do not require a speculum exam during their appointment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual Analog Score: A change of 13mmWithin 1 hour of the exam

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wellbeing quality of life score: Range 0-4.Within 1 hour of the examHigh wellbeing 2.5-4.0, Low wellbeing 1.5-2.4, and very low wellbeing 0-1.4
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Score: Scale 10-40Within 1 hour of the examHigher numbers indicate higher self-esteem
Female Sexual Function Index-19Within 1 hour of the examScore of less than 26.55 indicates sexual dysfunction

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026