Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Conditions
Keywords
Diagnosis
Brief summary
The purpose of this study will be to determine the performance characteristics of TBDx with culture as a gold standard. In addition, the investigators will assess the laboratory technicians' appraisal and technical suitability of the TBDx system.
Detailed description
This will be a blinded, prospective study to determine the performance of the TBDx system for detection of pulmonary TB in comparison to LED microscopy and culture as a gold standard. The study will involve recruitment of 300 TB suspects per site with a high workload and experienced technicians. Participants will be recruited under the FIND TB Reference Materials project and leftover sputum samples used for the assessment of the TBDx.
Interventions
DEVICETBDx
The TBDx is an automated platform is based on an Olympus BX41 microscope with a 40 x objective lens, fitted with an Olympus XC 10 colour camera and a movable slide stage, with an attached computer that receives high-quality digital images acquired from the camera. The computer then operates detection algorithms that segment, evaluate, and classify objects of interest in these images which can be stored for subsequent review. The platform is able to integrate an optional 200-slide automated slide loader for high volume settings. The application can capture 100, 300 or more digital fields-of-view and can provide results for positive or negative smears in 5 minutes or less.
Sponsors
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Persistent cough (\>2 weeks) and at least one other typical symptom of pulmonary TB (fever, night sweats, malaise, recent weight loss, contact with active case, hemoptysis, chest pain, loss of appetite) * Provision of informed consent (FIND TB Reference Materials) * Provision of sputum for adequate testing
Exclusion criteria
* Patients receiving any anti-TB medication, in the 60 days prior to testing. * Patients with only extra-pulmonary disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Performance of TBDx compared to culture | 6 months | Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of TBDx compared to two solid (Löwenstein Jensen) and two liquid (MGIT) cultures |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Training needs through questionnaire assessment | 6 months | Two days of hands-on, onsite TBDx training was provided to laboratory technicians with prior experience using smear microscopy, followed by 1-day observation. Each operator performed 3-4 runs under supervision and a proficiency assessment was conducted prior to study initiation. Following study completion all technicians were given a survey to assess perception of training needs and ease of use. |
| Comparison of performance of TBDx on direct vs concentrated smear | 6 months | — |
| Performance of TBDx in combination with Xpert MTB/RIF through analysis of two different algorithms | 6 months | The performance of an algorithm combining direct TBDx as a triage test, followed by Xpert for confirmation of positive TBDx cases for the different cut-off points was assessed |
| User appraisal regarding ease of use, hands-on-time and perceived benefit through appraisal questionnaire | 6 months | — |
| Identify potential difficulties for implementation through observation and user appraisal | 6 months | Potential barriers for implementation were assessed through observation and appraisal questionnaires following study completion, taking into account total time, complexity, number of steps, etc. |
Countries
Peru, Vietnam
Outcome results
None listed