Skip to content

Postoperative Pain Following Irrigation With Endodontic Needle, Sonic and Passive Ultrasonic Techniques

Postoperative Pain Following Irrigation With Endodontic Needle, Sonic and Passive Ultrasonic Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02912286
Enrollment
57
Registered
2016-09-23
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2016-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth,Non-vital

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative pain after root canal treatment following irrigation by endodontic needle, sonic and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques.

Detailed description

Different irrigation delivery systems are introduced to the market aiming to improve root canals disinfection. The conventional endodontic needle is commonly used because of its ease in use and good control of needle depth and irrigant volume. However it carries a higher risk of extruding the solution periapically because of positive pressure used in solution delivery. Passive ultrasonic irrigation is a noncutting irrigation technique that is done with ultrasonically activated files with continuous or intermittent flow of irrigant. It was shown that it is effective in removing remnants of pulp tissue, dentin debris and planktonic bacteria. The vibringe (Cavex Holland BV, Haarlem, the Netherlands) is an irrigation device that combines manual delivery and sonic activation of the irrigant. The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative pain after root canal treatment following irrigation by endodontic needle, sonic and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques.

Interventions

conventional side-vented syringe used to deliver irrigant in root canal treatment

ultrasonic tip (IrriSafe) activate the irrigant after mechanical preparation in root canal treatment

vibringe system is a sonic device that deliver and agitate the irrigant

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males or Females * Age between 16-60 years old * Permanent Mandibular molars with: * Non-vital response of pulp tissue * Absence of spontaneous pain

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant females * Patients having significant systemic disorder * Patients received analgesics, anti-inflammatory or antibiotic in the last 24 hours * Teeth that have: * Vital pulp tissues * Association with swelling or fistulous tract * Acute periapical abscess * Greater than grade I mobility * Pocket depth greater than 5mm * Previous endodontic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative pain measured by numerical rate scale4 hours after treatmentNumerical rate scale (NRS) consists of a line graded from 0-10 where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst pain, patient will choose the number that describe his pain level.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026