Skip to content

Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Subjects With Treatment-naive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia /Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL)

Phase 2 Study of the Combination of Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Subjects With Treatment-naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02910583
Acronym
Captivate
Enrollment
323
Registered
2016-09-22
Start date
2016-09-28
Completion date
2024-03-27
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, 2-cohort Phase 2 study assessing both minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided discontinuation and fixed duration therapy with the combination of ibrutinib + venetoclax in subjects with treatment-naïve CLL or SLL.

Interventions

DRUGibrutinib

ibrutinib administered orally once daily (three 140 mg capsules)

DRUGvenetoclax

venetoclax tablets will be administered orally once daily starting with a 5 week ramp up of 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg and 400 mg. After ramp up, venetoclax will be administered at 400 mg.

DRUGPlacebo

placebo capsules to match ibrutinib administered orally once daily

Sponsors

Pharmacyclics LLC.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants with confirmed undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in the MRD cohort are triple masked. Allocation was not randomized for the Fixed Duration (FD) cohort.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of CLL/SLL that meets 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) diagnostic criteria (Hallek et al), with active disease meeting at least 1 IWCLL criteria for requiring treatment. * Measurable nodal disease by computed tomography (CT) * Adequate hepatic, and renal function * Adequate hematologic function * absolute neutrophil count \>750/µL * platelet count \>30,000 /μL * hemoglobin \>8.0 g/dL

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior therapy used for treatment of CLL/SLL * Known allergy to xanthine oxidase inhibitors and/or rasburicase for subjects at risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRD Cohort: 1-Year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Rate in Confirmed uMRD Randomized Participants1 year after randomizationDFS is defined as time from randomization date to MRD-positive relapse, or disease progression per investigator assessment (per 2008 International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia \[IWCLL\] criteria \[Halleck et al\]) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. 1-year DFS estimated using Kaplan-Meier method at 12 months landmark time.
FD Cohort: Complete Response Rate (CRR; Complete Response/Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery [CR/CRi]) RateFrom the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.CR/CRi rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) per 2008 IWCLL criteria (halleck et al.) on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurred earlier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRD Cohort: CRR (CR/CRi Rate)From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)CR/CRi rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR or CRi per 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al.) on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurred earlier. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.
MRD Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)ORR, defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of protocol-specified complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), partial response (PR), or PR with lymphocytosis (PRL) evaluated in accordance with the 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al). Participants who did not have any postbaseline response assessment were considered as non-responders. This table is based on response assessments performed on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier. Kaplan-Meier estimate. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.
MRD Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) at 42 Months Landmark TimeFrom initial documentation of a response until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)Duration of response was calculated for participants achieving a response (CR, CRi, nPR, PR) based on 2008 IWCLL response criteria (Halleck et al.) and defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a response including PR with lymphocytosis, until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. As the median DOR was not reached as of 67.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of DOR at 42 months landmark time was presented. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.
MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RateFrom randomization date until before any subsequent antineoplastic therapy, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)MRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving MRD negativity, which is defined as \<1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes (\<1 x 10\^-4) as assessed by flow cytometry of a peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) aspirate sample per central laboratory on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.
MRD Cohort: Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Risk Reduction Rate With 3-Cycle Ibrutinib Lead-In (Percentage of Participants No Longer High Risk After 3-cycle Lead-in)Baseline, and last post-baseline value on or prior to venetoclax first dose date (cycle 4 day 1) or, for participants who never received venetoclax, the post-baseline value closest to cycle 4 day 1 (i.e. 84 days after the first dose date of ibrutinib).TLS risk reduction was summarized by the percentage of participants with TLS risk reduced from high at baseline to medium or low after ibrutinib lead-in. A reduction in TLS risk from high risk to medium or low risk is clinically meaningful because there is a reduction in the extent of TLS monitoring and risk of hospitalization. TLS risk category is defined as the tumor burden category, where: Low=All lymph nodes (LN) \< 5 cm AND absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) \< 25 x 10\^9/L; Medium=Any LN 5 cm to \< 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x 10\^9/L; High=Any LN ≥ 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x10\^9/L AND any LN ≥ 5 cm.
MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark TimeFrom the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD or death, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)PFS was defined as time from the first dose date of study treatment until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al). As the median PFS was not reached as of the overall median 67.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS rate at 48 months landmark time was presented. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.
MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark TimeFrom the first dose of ibrutinib to time of death, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)OS is defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment until date of death due to any cause. As the median OS was not reached as of the overall median 67.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS rate at 48 months landmark time was presented. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib=69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo=67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib=47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + Venetoclax=47.9 months.
MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFrom first dose until 30 days following last dose of study drug. Overall median treatment duration for the MRD cohort was 45.1 months.An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires unplanned in-patient hospitalization \>24 hours or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is an important medical event. Severity of events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03: mild=grade1, moderate=grade 2, severe=grade 3, life-threatening=grade 4, death=grade 5. Causal relation of study drug and event was assessed as not related, unlikely, possibly or probably related to the study drug.
FD Cohort: ORRFrom the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best overall response CR, CRi, nPR, PR, or PRL as evaluated by investigator using 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al.). Participants who did not have any postbaseline response assessment were considered as non-responders. This table is based on response assessments performed on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier. Kaplan-Meier estimate.
FD Cohort: DOR at 60 Months Landmark TimeFrom initial documentation of a response until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.Duration of response was calculated for participants achieving a response (CR, CRi, nPR, PR) based on 2008 IWCLL response criteria (Halleck et al.) and defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a response including PR with lymphocytosis, until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. As the median DOR was not reached as of the median 27.9 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of DOR at 60 months landmark time was presented.
FD Cohort: MRD Negativity RateFrom randomization date until before any subsequent antineoplastic therapy, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.MRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving MRD negativity, which is defined as \<1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes (\<1 x 10\^-4) as assessed by flow cytometry of a peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) aspirate sample per central laboratory on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier.
FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS Rate at 66 Months Landmark TimeFrom the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD or death, for an median follow-up of 69.0 months.PFS was defined as time from the first dose date of study treatment until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al). As the median PFS was not reached as of the median 69.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS rate at 66 months landmark time was presented.
FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS Rate at 66 Months Landmark TimeFrom the first dose of ibrutinib to time of death, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.OS is defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment until date of death due to any cause. As the median OS was not reached as of the median 69.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS rate at 66 months landmark time was presented.
FD Cohort: TLS Risk Reduction Rate With 3-Cycle Ibrutinib Lead-In (Percentage of Participants No Longer High Risk After 3-cycle Lead-in)Baseline, and last post-baseline value on or prior to venetoclax first dose date (cycle 4 day 1) or, for participants who never received venetoclax, the post-baseline value closest to cycle 4 day 1 (i.e. 84 days after the first dose date of ibrutinib).TLS risk reduction was summarized by the percentage of participants with TLS risk reduced from high at baseline to medium or low after ibrutinib lead-in. A reduction in TLS risk from high risk to medium or low risk is clinically meaningful because there is a reduction in the extent of TLS monitoring and risk of hospitalization. TLS risk category is defined as the tumor burden category, where: Low=All lymph nodes (LN) \< 5 cm AND absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) \< 25 x 10\^9/L; Medium=Any LN 5 cm to \< 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x 10\^9/L; High=Any LN ≥ 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x10\^9/L AND any LN ≥ 5 cm.
FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFrom first dose until 30 days following last dose of study drug. Overall median treatment duration for the FD cohort was 13.8 months.An AE is any untoward medical occurrence, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires unplanned in-patient hospitalization \>24 hours or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is an important medical event. Severity of events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03: mild=grade1, moderate=grade 2, severe=grade 3, life-threatening=grade 4, death=grade 5. Causal relation of study drug and event was assessed as not related, unlikely, possibly or probably related to the study drug.
MRD Cohort: Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax)Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax); Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast); Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term)Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Over the Last 24-hour Dosing Interval (AUC0-24h); AUC From Time Zero to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz)Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady-State (CLss/F)Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: CmaxCycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: TmaxCycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: AUC0-24hCycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)
MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: CLss/FCycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Countries

Australia, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORABBVIE INC.

AbbVie

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 39 centers in the United States (US), Australia, New Zealand, Spain, and Italy.

Pre-assignment details

Upon completion of a pre-randomization phase, participants in the MRD Cohort with confirmed undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) were randomized to blinded ibrutinib or placebo. Participants in the MRD Cohort with uMRD not confirmed were randomized to open-label ibrutinib or open-label ibrutinib + venetoclax.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FD Cohort: All Treated
Participants received 420 mg of single agent ibrutinib for first 3 cycles followed by ibrutinib plus venetoclax combination treatment (ibrutinib 420 mg and venetoclax 400 mg orally once daily on a continuous schedule) for 12 cycles (a cycle is defined by 28 days) or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever was earlier. Participants with confirmed progression per 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) criteria after completion of the fixed duration regimen could be retreated with continuous single agent ibrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever was earlier, because it is an established standard of care for treatment of relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). For participants who experienced durable efficacy after ibrutinib plus venetoclax (ie, time to progression after fixed duration regimen is completed of \>2 years), the ibrutinib plus venetoclax fixed duration treatment regimen may have been repeated based on Investigator's clinical discretion and Medical Monitor's approval. Retreatment was for 15 cycles, until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity.
159
MRD Cohort: All Treated
Participants received 420 mg of single-agent ibrutinib for the first 3 cycles followed by ibrutinib plus venetoclax combination treatment for at least 12 cycles (a cycle is defined as 28 days) prior to randomization (pre-randomization phase). Participants who completed the planned pre-randomization treatment were eligible to be randomized according to their confirmed undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) status: Participants with confirmed uMRD were randomized to receive blinded ibrutinib 420 mg or placebo orally once daily on a continuous schedule until PD or unacceptable toxicity, whichever was earlier. Participants with uMRD not confirmed were randomized to receive open-label ibrutinib 420 mg or open-label ibrutinib 420 mg plus venetoclax 400 mg orally once daily on a continuous schedule until PD or unacceptable toxicity, whichever was earlier. The venetoclax could be administered cumulative from pre-randomization to randomization phase at the dose of 400 mg/day for up to approximately 2 years, or earlier PD or unacceptable toxicity.
164
Total323

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFD Cohort: All TreatedMRD Cohort: All TreatedTotal
Age, Customized
< 65 years
114 Participants123 Participants237 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
45 Participants41 Participants86 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants11 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
149 Participants150 Participants299 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
147 Participants147 Participants294 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants61 Participants114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
106 Participants103 Participants209 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1590 / 1645 / 1593 / 1641 / 430 / 431 / 310 / 322 / 180 / 110 / 70 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1591 / 164156 / 159163 / 16443 / 4343 / 4331 / 3132 / 3214 / 1811 / 115 / 72 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1592 / 16437 / 15963 / 16415 / 4314 / 4313 / 3112 / 326 / 180 / 111 / 70 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

FD Cohort: Complete Response Rate (CRR; Complete Response/Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery [CR/CRi]) Rate

CR/CRi rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) per 2008 IWCLL criteria (halleck et al.) on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurred earlier.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.

Population: Per protocol, the primary analysis of the primary endpoint for the FD cohort was based on the FD Cohort, Non-Del 17p Population only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Complete Response Rate (CRR; Complete Response/Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery [CR/CRi]) Rate58.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: Complete Response Rate (CRR; Complete Response/Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery [CR/CRi]) Rate57.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001asymptotic test for binomial proportion
Primary

MRD Cohort: 1-Year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Rate in Confirmed uMRD Randomized Participants

DFS is defined as time from randomization date to MRD-positive relapse, or disease progression per investigator assessment (per 2008 International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia \[IWCLL\] criteria \[Halleck et al\]) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. 1-year DFS estimated using Kaplan-Meier method at 12 months landmark time.

Time frame: 1 year after randomization

Population: Confirmed uMRD Randomized Population: all participants who achieved confirmed MRD-negative clinical response at the end of the pre-randomization phase, randomized to either blinded placebo arm or blinded ibrutinib arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: 1-Year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Rate in Confirmed uMRD Randomized Participants100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: 1-Year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Rate in Confirmed uMRD Randomized Participants95.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.147595% CI: [-1.6, 10.9]Z test
Secondary

FD Cohort: DOR at 60 Months Landmark Time

Duration of response was calculated for participants achieving a response (CR, CRi, nPR, PR) based on 2008 IWCLL response criteria (Halleck et al.) and defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a response including PR with lymphocytosis, until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. As the median DOR was not reached as of the median 27.9 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of DOR at 60 months landmark time was presented.

Time frame: From initial documentation of a response until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.

Population: FD Cohort: Participants who achieved PR or better.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: DOR at 60 Months Landmark Time63.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: DOR at 60 Months Landmark Time60.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS Rate at 66 Months Landmark Time

OS is defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment until date of death due to any cause. As the median OS was not reached as of the median 69.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS rate at 66 months landmark time was presented.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to time of death, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.

Population: FD Cohort - All Treated Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS Rate at 66 Months Landmark Time96.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS Rate at 66 Months Landmark Time96.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS Rate at 66 Months Landmark Time

PFS was defined as time from the first dose date of study treatment until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al). As the median PFS was not reached as of the median 69.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS rate at 66 months landmark time was presented.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD or death, for an median follow-up of 69.0 months.

Population: FD Cohort - All Treated Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS Rate at 66 Months Landmark Time63.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS Rate at 66 Months Landmark Time60.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

FD Cohort: MRD Negativity Rate

MRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving MRD negativity, which is defined as \<1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes (\<1 x 10\^-4) as assessed by flow cytometry of a peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) aspirate sample per central laboratory on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier.

Time frame: From randomization date until before any subsequent antineoplastic therapy, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.

Population: FD Cohort - All Treated Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: MRD Negativity RateBM or PB78.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: MRD Negativity RateBM61.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: MRD Negativity RatePB76.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: MRD Negativity RateBM or PB78.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: MRD Negativity RateBM59.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: MRD Negativity RatePB76.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

FD Cohort: ORR

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best overall response CR, CRi, nPR, PR, or PRL as evaluated by investigator using 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al.). Participants who did not have any postbaseline response assessment were considered as non-responders. This table is based on response assessments performed on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier. Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for a median follow-up of 69.0 months.

Population: FD Cohort: All Treated Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: ORR95.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)FD Cohort: ORR96.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires unplanned in-patient hospitalization \>24 hours or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is an important medical event. Severity of events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03: mild=grade1, moderate=grade 2, severe=grade 3, life-threatening=grade 4, death=grade 5. Causal relation of study drug and event was assessed as not related, unlikely, possibly or probably related to the study drug.

Time frame: From first dose until 30 days following last dose of study drug. Overall median treatment duration for the FD cohort was 13.8 months.

Population: FD Cohort: All Treated Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE99.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 TEAE62.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibrutinib (Ibr)-Related TEAE92.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Ibrutinib-Related TEAE44.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Venetoclax (Ven)-Related TEAE84.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Venetoclax-Related TEAE45.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation5.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ibr Only3.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ven Only0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Both Ibr and Ven1.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Dose Reduction20.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr Only Dose Reduction5.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ven Only Dose Reduction11.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Both Ibr and Ven Dose Reduction3.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE23.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >= 3 SAE20.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE Related to Ibr or Ven13.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibr-related SAE11.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ven-related SAE8.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFatal TEAE0.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage TEAE1.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsGrade >= 3 Major Hemorrhage TEAE1.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Treatment-Emergent SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage SAE1.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

FD Cohort: TLS Risk Reduction Rate With 3-Cycle Ibrutinib Lead-In (Percentage of Participants No Longer High Risk After 3-cycle Lead-in)

TLS risk reduction was summarized by the percentage of participants with TLS risk reduced from high at baseline to medium or low after ibrutinib lead-in. A reduction in TLS risk from high risk to medium or low risk is clinically meaningful because there is a reduction in the extent of TLS monitoring and risk of hospitalization. TLS risk category is defined as the tumor burden category, where: Low=All lymph nodes (LN) \< 5 cm AND absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) \< 25 x 10\^9/L; Medium=Any LN 5 cm to \< 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x 10\^9/L; High=Any LN ≥ 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x10\^9/L AND any LN ≥ 5 cm.

Time frame: Baseline, and last post-baseline value on or prior to venetoclax first dose date (cycle 4 day 1) or, for participants who never received venetoclax, the post-baseline value closest to cycle 4 day 1 (i.e. 84 days after the first dose date of ibrutinib).

Population: FD Cohort: All Treated Population with baseline TLS high risk

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)FD Cohort: TLS Risk Reduction Rate With 3-Cycle Ibrutinib Lead-In (Percentage of Participants No Longer High Risk After 3-cycle Lead-in)94.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: CRR (CR/CRi Rate)

CR/CRi rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of CR or CRi per 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al.) on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurred earlier. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)

Population: MRD Cohort - All Treated Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: CRR (CR/CRi Rate)66.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: CRR (CR/CRi Rate)79.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: CRR (CR/CRi Rate)65.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: CRR (CR/CRi Rate)77.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: CRR (CR/CRi Rate)56.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) at 42 Months Landmark Time

Duration of response was calculated for participants achieving a response (CR, CRi, nPR, PR) based on 2008 IWCLL response criteria (Halleck et al.) and defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a response including PR with lymphocytosis, until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. As the median DOR was not reached as of 67.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of DOR at 42 months landmark time was presented. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.

Time frame: From initial documentation of a response until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)

Population: MRD Cohort: Participants who achieved PR or better

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) at 42 Months Landmark Time93.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) at 42 Months Landmark Time97.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) at 42 Months Landmark Time93.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) at 42 Months Landmark Time96.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) at 42 Months Landmark Time93.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time

OS is defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment until date of death due to any cause. As the median OS was not reached as of the overall median 67.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS rate at 48 months landmark time was presented. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib=69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo=67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib=47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + Venetoclax=47.9 months.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to time of death, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)

Population: MRD Cohort - All Treated Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time98.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time97.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time96.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time

PFS was defined as time from the first dose date of study treatment until disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al). As the median PFS was not reached as of the overall median 67.0 months study follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS rate at 48 months landmark time was presented. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD or death, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)

Population: MRD Cohort - All Treated Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time90.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time97.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time88.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time93.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 48 Months Landmark Time93.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity Rate

MRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving MRD negativity, which is defined as \<1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes (\<1 x 10\^-4) as assessed by flow cytometry of a peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) aspirate sample per central laboratory on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.

Time frame: From randomization date until before any subsequent antineoplastic therapy, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)

Population: MRD All Treated Population; participants with an assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB79.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB or BM81.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RateBM77.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RateBM55.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB or BM65.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB60.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB48.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB or BM51.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RateBM41.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RateBM68.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB or BM78.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: MRD-Negativity RatePB71.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR, defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of protocol-specified complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), partial response (PR), or PR with lymphocytosis (PRL) evaluated in accordance with the 2008 IWCLL criteria (Halleck et al). Participants who did not have any postbaseline response assessment were considered as non-responders. This table is based on response assessments performed on or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy or, if applicable, reintroduction of study treatment, whichever occurs earlier. Kaplan-Meier estimate. Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms: Confirmed uMRD Ibrutinib arm 69.1 months; Confirmed uMRD Placebo arm 67.4 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib arm 47.9 months; uMRD Not Confirmed Ibrutinib + Venetoclax arm 47.9 months.

Time frame: From the first dose of ibrutinib to the first confirmed PD, for an overall median follow-up of 67.0 months. (Median follow up duration for the individual MRD Cohort treatment arms listed above.)

Population: MRD Cohort - All Treated Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)97.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEs

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires unplanned in-patient hospitalization \>24 hours or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is an important medical event. Severity of events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03: mild=grade1, moderate=grade 2, severe=grade 3, life-threatening=grade 4, death=grade 5. Causal relation of study drug and event was assessed as not related, unlikely, possibly or probably related to the study drug.

Time frame: From first dose until 30 days following last dose of study drug. Overall median treatment duration for the MRD cohort was 45.1 months.

Population: All Treated Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ven-related SAE6.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Venetoclax-Related TEAE44.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Both Ibr and Ven Dose Reduction4.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Dose Reduction26.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage TEAE2.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibr-related SAE17.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation15.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Ibrutinib-Related TEAE57.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ven Only Dose Reduction4.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage SAE2.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE Related to Ibr or Ven20.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ibr Only10.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr Only Dose Reduction16.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFatal TEAE1.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Venetoclax (Ven)-Related TEAE81.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >= 3 SAE28.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ven Only1.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibrutinib (Ibr)-Related TEAE95.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsGrade >= 3 Major Hemorrhage TEAE1.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 TEAE75.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE34.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Both Ibr and Ven4.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibr-related SAE14.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Both Ibr and Ven Dose Reduction4.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Dose Reduction23.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibrutinib (Ibr)-Related TEAE97.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ven Only Dose Reduction2.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr Only Dose Reduction16.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage SAE2.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage TEAE2.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Ibrutinib-Related TEAE55.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFatal TEAE2.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Venetoclax (Ven)-Related TEAE88.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ven-related SAE4.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Venetoclax-Related TEAE51.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 TEAE83.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Both Ibr and Ven0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation16.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE Related to Ibr or Ven18.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ibr Only14.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsGrade >= 3 Major Hemorrhage TEAE2.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >= 3 SAE32.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ven Only2.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE34.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr Only Dose Reduction11.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 TEAE72.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibrutinib (Ibr)-Related TEAE93.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Ibrutinib-Related TEAE51.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Venetoclax (Ven)-Related TEAE76.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Venetoclax-Related TEAE34.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ibr Only0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ven Only0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Both Ibr and Ven0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Dose Reduction25.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ven Only Dose Reduction11.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Both Ibr and Ven Dose Reduction2.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE32.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >= 3 SAE27.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE Related to Ibr or Ven14.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibr-related SAE11.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ven-related SAE7.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFatal TEAE0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage TEAE0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsGrade >= 3 Major Hemorrhage TEAE0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Placebo (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage SAE0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ven Only0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ven-related SAE12.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation9.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsGrade >= 3 Major Hemorrhage TEAE3.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Ibrutinib-Related TEAE61.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFatal TEAE3.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE Related to Ibr or Ven25.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 TEAE71.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibrutinib (Ibr)-Related TEAE96.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ibr Only9.7 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage TEAE3.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr Only Dose Reduction19.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Venetoclax-Related TEAE45.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage SAE3.2 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Dose Reduction25.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibr-related SAE22.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ven Only Dose Reduction0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >= 3 SAE32.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE41.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Both Ibr and Ven0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Venetoclax (Ven)-Related TEAE80.6 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label IbrutinibMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Both Ibr and Ven Dose Reduction6.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE100.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ven Only0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE37.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Ibr Only3.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >= 3 SAE28.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation12.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny SAE Related to Ibr or Ven21.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Venetoclax-Related TEAE56.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsGrade >= 3 Major Hemorrhage TEAE3.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibr-related SAE18.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Venetoclax (Ven)-Related TEAE96.9 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Both Ibr and Ven Dose Reduction6.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ven-related SAE6.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 Ibrutinib-Related TEAE62.5 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsFatal TEAE0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Ibrutinib (Ibr)-Related TEAE93.8 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage SAE6.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr Only Dose Reduction25.0 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Dose Reduction34.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsMajor Hemorrhage TEAE6.3 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ven Only Dose Reduction3.1 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny TEAE Leading to Ibr or Ven Discontinuation: Both Ibr and Ven9.4 percentage of participants
MRD Cohort/uMRD Not Confirmed: Randomized to Open-Label Ibrutinib + VenetoclaxMRD Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to TEAEsAny Grade >=3 TEAE78.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

MRD Cohort: Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax)

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax)88.5 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 74.3
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady-State (CLss/F)

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady-State (CLss/F)833 L/hGeometric Coefficient of Variation 90.9
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Over the Last 24-hour Dosing Interval (AUC0-24h); AUC From Time Zero to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for each PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Over the Last 24-hour Dosing Interval (AUC0-24h); AUC From Time Zero to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)AUC0-24h504 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 76.3
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Over the Last 24-hour Dosing Interval (AUC0-24h); AUC From Time Zero to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)AUClast480 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 78.5
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz)

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz)0.132 1/hGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.5
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax); Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast); Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term)

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for each PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax); Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast); Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term)tmax2.00 hours
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax); Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast); Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term)tlast24.0 hours
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Ibrutinib When Dosed in Combination With Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax); Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast); Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term)t1/2term5.30 hours
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: AUC0-24h

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: AUC0-24h48993 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66.2
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: CLss/F

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: CLss/F8.16 L/hGeometric Coefficient of Variation 69.7
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: Cmax

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: Cmax3034 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.3
Secondary

MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: Tmax

Time frame: Cycle 6 Day 1: predose, at dose, 1 h (±15 min), 2 h (±15 min), 4 h (±15 min), 6 h (±15 min), 8 h (±15 min)

Population: MRD Cohort: All treated participants who were evaluable for PK analysis. Data were collected for the MRD cohort only, and without regard to uMRD confirmation status/randomization group, as pre-specified for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: PK of Venetoclax When Dosed in Combination With Ibrutinib: Tmax6.00 hours
Secondary

MRD Cohort: Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Risk Reduction Rate With 3-Cycle Ibrutinib Lead-In (Percentage of Participants No Longer High Risk After 3-cycle Lead-in)

TLS risk reduction was summarized by the percentage of participants with TLS risk reduced from high at baseline to medium or low after ibrutinib lead-in. A reduction in TLS risk from high risk to medium or low risk is clinically meaningful because there is a reduction in the extent of TLS monitoring and risk of hospitalization. TLS risk category is defined as the tumor burden category, where: Low=All lymph nodes (LN) \< 5 cm AND absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) \< 25 x 10\^9/L; Medium=Any LN 5 cm to \< 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x 10\^9/L; High=Any LN ≥ 10 cm OR ALC ≥ 25 x10\^9/L AND any LN ≥ 5 cm.

Time frame: Baseline, and last post-baseline value on or prior to venetoclax first dose date (cycle 4 day 1) or, for participants who never received venetoclax, the post-baseline value closest to cycle 4 day 1 (i.e. 84 days after the first dose date of ibrutinib).

Population: MRD Cohort: All Treated Population with baseline TLS high risk

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRD Cohort/Confirmed uMRD: Randomized to Ibrutinib (Blinded)MRD Cohort: Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Risk Reduction Rate With 3-Cycle Ibrutinib Lead-In (Percentage of Participants No Longer High Risk After 3-cycle Lead-in)90.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026