Skip to content

Infrared Thermography for Assessment of Caudal Block in Children

A Clinical Evaluation Of Infrared Thermography To Assess Successful Caudal Block In Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02907957
Enrollment
14
Registered
2016-09-20
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2018-06-28
Last updated
2019-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Conduction

Brief summary

Regional analgesia via caudal neuraxial blockade provides pain relief for pediatric patients following urological and lower extremity procedures. The injection of local anesthetic into the caudal epidural space causes a sensory loss. This sympathetic blockade in turn causes a vasodilation, or increased blood flow, to the lower extremities. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the FLIR ONE thermographic camera, a smartphone attachment which utilizes an application (app) to measure the temperature at a site on an image of the lower extremity, will be able to differentiate between caudal, non-caudal, and failed caudal images.

Interventions

DEVICEFLIR ONE

Thermographic assessment of the lower extremities is obtained using the FLIR ONE smartphone camera and software.

PROCEDURERegional Anesthesia - Caudal Nerve Block

Nerve block placement as a pain management strategy indicated for certain urological and lower extremity surgeries.

Sponsors

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children from 6mos to 5 years of age requiring general anesthesia and a caudal block for a surgical procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with preexisting conditions that could affect the skin temperature on the lower extremities such as infection, edema, vascular disorder, etc. * American Society of Anesthesiologists comorbidity ranking of 4 or greater * Patient with contraindications for a caudal block such as: history of allergic, reactions to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, infection at the injection site, spinal abnormality, peripheral neurological disease, Raynaud's disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predictive value of FLIR ONEAssessments will be done through study completion, an average of 1 week following procedure.Reviewers blinded to intervention groups will asses patient pre-caudal, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 minute post-caudal images and rate whether, based on the image, they believe the patient received a caudal or not. The sensitivity and specificity of the FLIR ONE as a diagnositic tol will then be determined.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inter- and Intra- rater reliabilityAssessments will be done through study completion, an average of 1 week following procedure.Reviewers will evaluate patient image at two separate ties at least a week apart. Recorded images will be compared within and between reviewers.
Temperature differences between pre-caudal and 5 minute post-caudal imagesImages will be captured prior to caudal and 5 minutes immediately afterwards. Assessments will be done through study completion, an average of 1 week following procedure.Temperature differences between pre-caudal and 5 minute images will be summarized in both groups. Images in the non-caudal group will be taken at similar time points following anesthesia induction relative to caudal group patients.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026