Skip to content

Revealed Versus Concealed Cerebroplacental Ratio

Revealed Versus Concealed Criteria for Placental Insufficiency in Unselected Obstetric Population in Late Pregnancy: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02907242
Enrollment
11582
Registered
2016-09-20
Start date
2016-05-04
Completion date
2022-01-06
Last updated
2022-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stillbirth

Keywords

stillbirth, cerebroplacental ratio, fetal growth restriction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of an integrated strategy at selecting fetuses for delivery at term based on a combination of fetal biometry and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) to reduce stillbirth rate and adverse perinatal outcome.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, open-label randomized trial with groups in parallel. Singleton pregnancies are recruited after routine second trimester scan (19+0 to 22+6 weeks of gestation) and randomly allocated at that moment to revealed or concealed strategy. A routine scan will be booked at 36-37 weeks. For a reduction of the stillbirth rate of 3‰ (from 5‰ to 2‰), assuming a type I error of 5% and aiming for a power of 80% a total of 11,582 subjects (5791 per arm) were projected. The participating centers sum up 12,000 deliveries a year. It is not possible to blind participants, obstetricians, or outcome assessors to the study group. General hypothesis: A proportion of fetuses with normal growth as per current standards have placental insufficiency and restriction of their growth potential. These fetuses exhibit biophysical changes expressed by abnormal cerebroplacental ratio. A combination of this marker with fetal biometry for the detection of fetuses affected by fetal growth restriction could identify a group of babies on which labor induction once term is reached may prevent the occurrence of adverse outcomes. Specific hypothesis * The cerebroplacental ratio has predictive value in late pregnancy for placental insufficiency. * The cerebroplacental ratio could improve the effectiveness of late pregnancy screening for the prediction placental insufficiency-related complications.

Interventions

OTHERRevealment

Cerebroplacental ratio revealment

Sponsors

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Viable singleton non-malformed fetus * Available first-trimester US dating * Maternal age at recruitment ≥18 years * No adverse medical or obstetrical history at booking * Capacity to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Abnormal karyotype * Structural abnormalities * Congenital infections

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stillbirthbetween 37 and 42 weeks of pregnancyPerinatal death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse perinatal outcomeUp to 28 days after deliverySevere neurological and non-neurological adverse outcome
Fetal Growth Restriction Detection3 yearsTo detect prenatal low birth weight

Countries

Chile, Czechia, Israel, Mexico, Poland, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026