Skip to content

Trial of Chronic Pain Self-Management in Clinic or Community for Low-Income Hispanics

Evaluating Clinic- and Community-Based Pain Self-Care Programs for Low-Income Hispanics on Opioids

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02906358
Enrollment
111
Registered
2016-09-20
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2018-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a parallel group, randomized trial of a chronic pain self-management program in clinic or community settings to educate and support low-income, Hispanic patients with chronic pain to adopt evidence-based pain self-care behaviors and activities.

Detailed description

Background and Significance Over the past two decades, opioid analgesic (OA) drugs have been increasingly prescribed for chronic pain despite little to no effectiveness of treatment \>6 months. In prospective cohorts, OA therapy can worsen pain and disability by promoting a sedentary lifestyle. With rapidly rising deaths from OA overdose and the lack of evidence of long-term effectiveness, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has developed its National Pain Strategy that sharply limits use of OAs and recommends non-pharmacologic interventions as first line approaches to manage chronic pain. A key aspect of a non-pharmacologic approach to managing chronic pain is educating patients about self-management in order to help them lead more productive lives and perform daily activities despite their pain. Self-management training is especially important for low-income patients who need practical, low cost ways to learn how to live fuller, more productive lives despite having chronic pain. To respond to this need to support low-income patients with chronic pain, we developed a chronic pain self-management program based on unmet needs identified by stakeholders from rural, largely Hispanic communities. We conducted a randomized trial to examine outcomes of two settings to deliver this self-management training program. Both settings evaluated whether patients' function improved when the same program was delivered in clinic in individual meetings with a trained community health worker or in a local community-based setting from group lectures by content experts. The training program in both settings offered education and training about such topics as: pain physiology and goal setting; stretching; strengthening; massage, and mindfulness techniques. This program not only reflects the unmet needs of rural, predominantly Hispanic stakeholders with chronic pain but also elements of other self-management programs for patients with chronic back and lower extremity musculoskeletal pain. However, this program was specifically designed for a low literacy, bilingual patient population with limited access to resources to help with non-pharmacologic management of chronic pain. Objective: To develop a chronic pain self-management program reflecting community stakeholders' priorities and conduct a randomized trial to evaluate functional outcomes from training in two settings. Subjects will be randomized to receive a 6-month pain self-management training program in: 1) Six 30-to-45 minute individual meetings with a trained community health worker in clinic or 2) nine 1-hour meetings for group lectures by content experts and practicing physical activities held in nearby public libraries. Study Design: The investigators conducted a parallel group, randomized trial of clinic- and community-based programs to educate and promote pain self-management among low-income, predominantly Hispanic patients aged 35-70 who had been prescribed at least two months of OA therapy for chronic non-cancer back and lower extremity pain. Patients were recruited from two primary care clinics and one HIV clinic that treat low-income patients. A total of 111 subjects were randomized to: 1) clinic-based meetings one-on-one with a trained community health worker, or 2) a community-based program in a local library with group lectures by content experts and training in exercises. The same low literacy PowerPoint educational program in Spanish or English was presented to both study arms except in the community, eight lectures about chronic pain self-management were presented plus one lecture about using library resources (biweekly for three months then monthly for three months). Whereas, in the clinic arm, the content was condensed to be covered in six monthly 30-45 minute meetings with the community health worker. To increase availability for subjects in the community arm, the same group session was offered twice a week. Sessions included: 1) Orientation to the pain program; 2) Pain physiology exercises/stretching; 3) Stress management and mindfulness; 4) Massage therapy approaches; 5) Nutrition; 6) Sleep hygiene; 7) Relapse prevention; 8) Health literacy (Internet resources); and 9) Review and long-term pain self-management strategies. To keep the group size manageable, the pain self-management program was held in two cohorts to meet library and clinic space limitations. All subjects received copies of slides from sessions with photos of local Hispanic community members performing stretching and strengthening exercises at different levels of difficulty. Participants also received activity logs to track personal goals, program DVDs (walking exercises, self-massage techniques), exercise mats, tennis balls for massage and multi-pronged self-massage tools. Physical therapy students helped patients select personalized goals for physical activities. All participants received text messages and phone calls from a coordinator (community) or a community health worker (clinic) to review progress and reinforce meeting attendance. Missed sessions were made up with a coordinator (community arm) or a community health worker (clinic arm). Baseline and follow-up measures were conducted by physical therapy students, CHWs, or team members not involved in that study arm. Twelve measures of physical, cognitive, and psychological, function and pain were assessed at 6 months in the clinic or the community location and 6 of these were also assessed at 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the five times sit-to-stand test (5XSTS) that was assessed at both 3 and 6 months and reflects both lower extremity strength and balance. The 5XSTS is significantly associated with disability and risk of falls. Secondary outcomes include: 6-minute distance walk test (6MW); Borg Perceived Effort test (Borg effort); 50-foot speed walk test (50FtSW); 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS); and Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Measures of psychological function include: 12-Item Short Form Survey Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). To assess cognitive function, the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) evaluates attention and psychomotor speed. All measures were performed at baseline and the 6-month study endpoint except the following measures also assessed at three months: 5XSTS, 50FtSW, BPI, PSFS and SDMT. These are all validated functional measures (see below). The practical self-management training program evaluated in this trial may offer a valuable resource for primary care practices striving to support their patients with chronic pain, especially those with limited access to other resources. Impact: If either or both of the approaches to deliver this chronic pain self-management training program improve patient functional outcomes, they can be easily replicated to evaluate in other low-income populations to improve function and possibly even reduce dependence on OA therapy.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCommunity-based pain self-management
BEHAVIORALClinic-based pain self-management

Sponsors

The University of Texas at San Antonio
CollaboratorOTHER
Bexar County Hospital District DBA University Health System
CollaboratorOTHER
San Antonio Public Libraries
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
South Central Area Health Education Center
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The University of Texas System Healthcare Safety & Effectiveness Grants Program
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active patient in two study primary care clinics or HIV clinic in same system * Prescribed OAs \>2 mos in the past year * Back/lower extremity pain * English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable comorbidity * Cardiovascular/pulmonary disease that prevents exercise * Cancer-related pain * Significant mental health disorder * Alcohol or drug abuse * Inability to walk unassisted for at least one block * Inability to provide consent (e.g., dementia) * Residing more than 10 miles from clinic (poor transportation) * Patients who are unable or unwilling to attend clinic- or community-based sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Five Times Sit-to-stand (5XSTS)Change from Baseline sit-to-stand at 3 and 6 monthsParticipants are instructed to sit and stand up five times as fast as they can from a standard armless chair while the researcher times how many seconds it takes them to complete the task. After a brief rest, they repeat the test a second time and the average of two tests is calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)Change from Baseline PSFS at 3 and 6 monthsThis is a brief, one-page document that prompts subjects to identify limitations to three activities, rank the importance of these activities, and track progress over time. The activities are scored on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates that the subject is unable to perform the activity and 10 indicates ability to perform the activity at the same level as before the injury or problem. The total summed score is divided by the number of activities, where a lower score would indicate less ability to perform the task, and the higher score would indicate easier performance of the task.
Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Change from Baseline SDMT at 3 and 6 monthsParticipants refer to a key on top of a page to translate non-verbal symbols to an alpha-numeric digit. The participants then fill in boxes (written and oral versions) with the correct digit assigned to a particular symbol. Total correct responses within 90 seconds were measured. The score of the test is the number of correct substitutions completed within the time limit, with a maximum score of 110. A score under 33 is generally considered to be a clear indicator of the existence of some type of cognitive disorder. The higher the score, the better the cognitive function.
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): SeverityChange from Baseline BPI at 3 and 6 monthsThe BPI is brief and uses simple 0-10 rating scales to measure pain intensity, where zero is no pain and ten is most intense pain imaginable.
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): InterferenceChange from Baseline BPI at 3 and 6 monthsThe BPI is brief and uses simple 0-10 rating scales to measure the degree to which pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function, where zero is does not interfere and ten is completely interferes.
6-minute Distance Walk (6MW)Change from Baseline 6-minute distance walk at 6 monthsFor this test, participants walk as far as they can for six minutes, and the total distance in feet is measured with a surveyor's wheel pushed by a research assistant walking behind the subject. Participants can pause or stop as necessary.
50-foot Speed Walk (50FtSW)Change from Baseline 50-foot speed walk at 3 and 6 monthsThis test requires participants to walk along a 25-foot walkway turn around and return to the starting point. They are instructed to safely walk as fast as they can and the time taken to complete the test is recorded in seconds.
Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS)Change from Baseline SF-12 PCS at 6 monthsThe 12-item Short Form Health Survey created for Medical Outcomes Study measures physical summary scores through a brief survey with limited respondent burden while retaining precision. Physical Health Composite Scores are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the lowest level of health, and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS)Change from baseline SF-12 MCS at 6 monthsThe 12-item Short Form Health Survey created for Medical Outcomes Study measures mental summary scores through a brief survey with limited respondent burden while retaining precision. Mental Health Composite Scores are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the lowest level of mental health, and 100 indicates the highest level of mental health.
Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9)Change from Baseline PHQ-9 at 6 monthsThe PHQ-9 is a brief, self-administered questionnaire that assesses somatic symptom severity. Participants rate the severity of 15 somatic symptoms as 0 (not bothered at all), 1 (bothered a little) or 2 (bothered a lot). The scores are totaled, with a possible total of 30, which would mean the most severe somatic symptoms, and 0 meaning the least somatic symptoms.
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)Change from Baseline TSK at 6 monthsThis is a 11-item questionnaire, where individuals score items on a scale of 1 to 4 (1=strongly disagree, 4=strongly agree) to measures fear of completing physical activities. The scores are totaled for all items, to give a possible score of 44, which would indicate a greater fear of injuring oneself. A lower score would indicate less fear of injury to oneself.
Borg Perceived Effort (Borg)Change from Baseline perceived effort at 6 monthsCompleted in conjunction with the 6-minute walk, this measures intensity and perceived effort after the test using a 0-10 Likert-type scale. Anchor words for the effort scales are no effort and most intense effort imaginable.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Community-based Pain Self-management
Community-based pain self-management: two, one-hour meetings monthly for the first three months (6 meetings) and one meeting per month for the last three months (total 9 meetings) Community-based pain self-management
58
Clinic-based Pain Self-management
Clinic-based pain self-management: 30-45 minute individualized meetings once monthly for 6 months (total 6 meetings) Clinic-based pain self-management
53
Total111

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1215
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject107

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCommunity-based Pain Self-managementClinic-based Pain Self-managementTotal
Age, Continuous56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
BMI35.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
33.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
34.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Employment Status
Employed
6 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed (retired, disabled, unemployed)
52 Participants52 Participants104 Participants
Insurance Type
Medicaid
13 Participants11 Participants24 Participants
Insurance Type
Medicare
21 Participants17 Participants38 Participants
Insurance Type
Private Insurance
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Insurance Type
Unisured
20 Participants19 Participants39 Participants
Marital Status
Married
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Marital Status
Other (single, divorced, separated, widowed)
40 Participants37 Participants77 Participants
Pain Location
Abdomen
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Pain Location
Back
19 Participants13 Participants32 Participants
Pain Location
Lower Extremity
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Pain Location
Multiple areas
30 Participants32 Participants62 Participants
Pain Location
Neck
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Pain Location
Upper Extremity
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Primary Language
English
45 Participants36 Participants81 Participants
Primary Language
Spanish
13 Participants17 Participants30 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
45 Participants42 Participants87 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic Black
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants24 Participants61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants29 Participants50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 580 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 582 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 580 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Five Times Sit-to-stand (5XSTS)

Participants are instructed to sit and stand up five times as fast as they can from a standard armless chair while the researcher times how many seconds it takes them to complete the task. After a brief rest, they repeat the test a second time and the average of two tests is calculated.

Time frame: Change from Baseline sit-to-stand at 3 and 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementFive Times Sit-to-stand (5XSTS)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months-4.53 secondsStandard Deviation 6.78
Community-based Pain Self-managementFive Times Sit-to-stand (5XSTS)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Months-4.18 secondsStandard Deviation 6.45
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementFive Times Sit-to-stand (5XSTS)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months-5.20 secondsStandard Deviation 17.53
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementFive Times Sit-to-stand (5XSTS)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Months-6.43 secondsStandard Deviation 14.11
Secondary

50-foot Speed Walk (50FtSW)

This test requires participants to walk along a 25-foot walkway turn around and return to the starting point. They are instructed to safely walk as fast as they can and the time taken to complete the test is recorded in seconds.

Time frame: Change from Baseline 50-foot speed walk at 3 and 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-management50-foot Speed Walk (50FtSW)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months-1.58 secondsStandard Deviation 5.55
Community-based Pain Self-management50-foot Speed Walk (50FtSW)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Month-1.32 secondsStandard Deviation 7.16
Clinic-based Pain Self-management50-foot Speed Walk (50FtSW)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months-1.22 secondsStandard Deviation 4.29
Clinic-based Pain Self-management50-foot Speed Walk (50FtSW)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Month-1.42 secondsStandard Deviation 4.85
Secondary

6-minute Distance Walk (6MW)

For this test, participants walk as far as they can for six minutes, and the total distance in feet is measured with a surveyor's wheel pushed by a research assistant walking behind the subject. Participants can pause or stop as necessary.

Time frame: Change from Baseline 6-minute distance walk at 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-management6-minute Distance Walk (6MW)20.0 feetStandard Deviation 291.9
Clinic-based Pain Self-management6-minute Distance Walk (6MW)193.9 feetStandard Deviation 429
Secondary

Borg Perceived Effort (Borg)

Completed in conjunction with the 6-minute walk, this measures intensity and perceived effort after the test using a 0-10 Likert-type scale. Anchor words for the effort scales are no effort and most intense effort imaginable.

Time frame: Change from Baseline perceived effort at 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementBorg Perceived Effort (Borg)-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementBorg Perceived Effort (Borg)-1.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.19
Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS)

The 12-item Short Form Health Survey created for Medical Outcomes Study measures mental summary scores through a brief survey with limited respondent burden while retaining precision. Mental Health Composite Scores are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the lowest level of mental health, and 100 indicates the highest level of mental health.

Time frame: Change from baseline SF-12 MCS at 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementMedical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS)41.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.58
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementMedical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS)39.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS)

The 12-item Short Form Health Survey created for Medical Outcomes Study measures physical summary scores through a brief survey with limited respondent burden while retaining precision. Physical Health Composite Scores are computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the lowest level of health, and 100 indicates the highest level of health.

Time frame: Change from Baseline SF-12 PCS at 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementMedical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS)2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.56
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementMedical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS)6.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.99
Secondary

Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9)

The PHQ-9 is a brief, self-administered questionnaire that assesses somatic symptom severity. Participants rate the severity of 15 somatic symptoms as 0 (not bothered at all), 1 (bothered a little) or 2 (bothered a lot). The scores are totaled, with a possible total of 30, which would mean the most severe somatic symptoms, and 0 meaning the least somatic symptoms.

Time frame: Change from Baseline PHQ-9 at 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementPatient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9)-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.42
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementPatient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9)-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.81
Secondary

Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)

This is a brief, one-page document that prompts subjects to identify limitations to three activities, rank the importance of these activities, and track progress over time. The activities are scored on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates that the subject is unable to perform the activity and 10 indicates ability to perform the activity at the same level as before the injury or problem. The total summed score is divided by the number of activities, where a lower score would indicate less ability to perform the task, and the higher score would indicate easier performance of the task.

Time frame: Change from Baseline PSFS at 3 and 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementPatient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Community-based Pain Self-managementPatient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Months1.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementPatient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementPatient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Months1.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Secondary

Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

Participants refer to a key on top of a page to translate non-verbal symbols to an alpha-numeric digit. The participants then fill in boxes (written and oral versions) with the correct digit assigned to a particular symbol. Total correct responses within 90 seconds were measured. The score of the test is the number of correct substitutions completed within the time limit, with a maximum score of 110. A score under 33 is generally considered to be a clear indicator of the existence of some type of cognitive disorder. The higher the score, the better the cognitive function.

Time frame: Change from Baseline SDMT at 3 and 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementSymbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months4.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.61
Community-based Pain Self-managementSymbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Month4.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.67
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementSymbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Change from Baseline Score at 3 Months6.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementSymbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Change from Baseline Score at 6 Month7.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.94
Secondary

Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)

This is a 11-item questionnaire, where individuals score items on a scale of 1 to 4 (1=strongly disagree, 4=strongly agree) to measures fear of completing physical activities. The scores are totaled for all items, to give a possible score of 44, which would indicate a greater fear of injuring oneself. A lower score would indicate less fear of injury to oneself.

Time frame: Change from Baseline TSK at 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementTampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.32
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementTampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Interference

The BPI is brief and uses simple 0-10 rating scales to measure the degree to which pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function, where zero is does not interfere and ten is completely interferes.

Time frame: Change from Baseline BPI at 3 and 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): InterferenceChange from Baseline Score at 3 Months-0.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Community-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): InterferenceChange from Baseline Score at 6 Months-1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): InterferenceChange from Baseline Score at 3 Months-1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): InterferenceChange from Baseline Score at 6 Months-1.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Secondary

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Severity

The BPI is brief and uses simple 0-10 rating scales to measure pain intensity, where zero is no pain and ten is most intense pain imaginable.

Time frame: Change from Baseline BPI at 3 and 6 months

Population: We report a completers analysis of unadjusted change in outcome measures in community and clinic arms at 3 months (for selected measures) and 6 months (for all measures), that include only completers in the participant flowchart (Community arm=36, Clinic arm 3 months=33, 6 months=31). Completers may differ by outcome if data was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Community-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): SeverityChange from Baseline Score at 3 Months-0.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Community-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): SeverityChange from Baseline Score at 6 Month-0.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): SeverityChange from Baseline Score at 3 Months-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Clinic-based Pain Self-managementThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): SeverityChange from Baseline Score at 6 Month-1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026