Skip to content

Enhancing Medication-based Analgesia in Humans

Using Dronabinol to Enhance the Analgesic Effect of Hydromorphone in Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02901275
Enrollment
29
Registered
2016-09-15
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2020-03-23
Last updated
2023-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cannabis, Opioid Use, Unspecified, Pain

Keywords

Clinical Trial, Phase II, Analgesia, Abuse Potential

Brief summary

This is a single-group, within-subject, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo and active-controlled study evaluated whether the FDA-approved cannabinoid dronabinol (Marinol) would enhance analgesia, subjective reports, and cognitive performance when compared to the FDA-approved opioid hydromorphone (Dilaudid).

Detailed description

This was a human laboratory systematic examination of whether adding the FDA-approved cannabinoid dronabinol (Marinol; oral) to the FDA-approved opioid hydromorphone (Dilaudid; oral) would change the experience of hydromorphone as rated by laboratory measures of pain, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance. Subjects are healthy individuals with no history of drug use disorder. Study subjects and staff were completed blinded to the study drugs and the class of drugs under investigation and were informed that subjects may receive opioids, stimulants, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines, over the counter medications, and/or placebo. All participants completed all sessions. Sessions lasted up to 8-hours and were conducted at least 7 days apart on an outpatient basis. Primary outcomes were collected from participants prior to dosing and at several hour periods post-dosing.

Interventions

Within-subject double-blind, double-dummy, study design wherein all participants received all doses in 8-hour outpatient sessions. Primary outcomes assessed during 8-hour outpatient sessions and included laboratory pain testing, subjective reports of drug effects, and cognitive performance, evaluated as a function of study medication condition.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Each participant completed each of the 5 study conditions (identified here as arms).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-75 * Urine sample tests negative for common illicit substances of abuse, including cannabis * Medically cleared to take study medications * Are not pregnant or breast feeding * Willing to comply with the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Meet DSM-5 criteria for alcohol/substance use disorder * Taking opioids for pain * Previous adverse reaction to a cannabinoid product * Prescribed and taking stimulants or benzodiazepines * Answer yes to item 1 of the Brief Pain Inventory indicating chronic pain * Self-report any illicit drug use in the past 7 days * Presence of any clinically significant medical/psychiatric illness judged by the investigators to put subject at elevated risk for experiencing an adverse event * History of seizure disorder * Have a known allergy to the study medications or sesame seed oil * Taking medications contraindicated with hydromorphone or dronabinol * Have a history of clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias or vasopastic disease * Have an abnormal and clinically-significant ECG

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Seconds to Withdraw Hand From Cold Pressor Laboratory Pain TaskBaseline and time of hand withdrawal from cold pressor, up to 60 secondsCompare study conditions in seconds to withdraw hand from cold pressor laboratory pain task, where longer time periods reflect higher tolerance to pain.
Mean Peak Rating of Drug Effect (0-100) as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale8-hour study sessionMean peak of Visual Analog Scale ratings of Drug Effect (0-100) compared across each study condition, with higher ratings reflecting stronger drug effects.
Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Percent Correct on Digit Symbol Substitution Test of Cognitive BehaviorBaseline and 8-hoursWithin-subject comparison of study conditions on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), a measure of cognitive performance that is sensitive to drug effects, wherein lower percent scores reflect worse performance and suggest greater drug-related impairment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This is a within-subject study, and all participants (n=29) completed all study conditions. The same 29 participants moved from one treatment arm to the next.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
This is a within group study and same participants went through all treatment arms.
29
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 290 / 290 / 290 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 2922 / 2911 / 2925 / 2921 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 290 / 290 / 290 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Maximum Percent Correct on Digit Symbol Substitution Test of Cognitive Behavior

Within-subject comparison of study conditions on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), a measure of cognitive performance that is sensitive to drug effects, wherein lower percent scores reflect worse performance and suggest greater drug-related impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and 8-hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo + Placebo ConditionMean Change From Baseline in Maximum Percent Correct on Digit Symbol Substitution Test of Cognitive Behavior10.2 Mean Percent Correct
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Placebo ConditionMean Change From Baseline in Maximum Percent Correct on Digit Symbol Substitution Test of Cognitive Behavior5.1 Mean Percent Correct
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 2.5mgMean Change From Baseline in Maximum Percent Correct on Digit Symbol Substitution Test of Cognitive Behavior10.1 Mean Percent Correct
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 5.0mgMean Change From Baseline in Maximum Percent Correct on Digit Symbol Substitution Test of Cognitive Behavior10.3 Mean Percent Correct
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 10mgMean Change From Baseline in Maximum Percent Correct on Digit Symbol Substitution Test of Cognitive Behavior3.6 Mean Percent Correct
p-value: 0.51Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Seconds to Withdraw Hand From Cold Pressor Laboratory Pain Task

Compare study conditions in seconds to withdraw hand from cold pressor laboratory pain task, where longer time periods reflect higher tolerance to pain.

Time frame: Baseline and time of hand withdrawal from cold pressor, up to 60 seconds

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Placebo ConditionMean Change From Baseline in Seconds to Withdraw Hand From Cold Pressor Laboratory Pain Task25.4 secondsStandard Error 12.7
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Placebo ConditionMean Change From Baseline in Seconds to Withdraw Hand From Cold Pressor Laboratory Pain Task33.9 secondsStandard Error 15.7
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 2.5mgMean Change From Baseline in Seconds to Withdraw Hand From Cold Pressor Laboratory Pain Task31.7 secondsStandard Error 10.9
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 5.0mgMean Change From Baseline in Seconds to Withdraw Hand From Cold Pressor Laboratory Pain Task36.7 secondsStandard Error 12.6
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 10mgMean Change From Baseline in Seconds to Withdraw Hand From Cold Pressor Laboratory Pain Task18.1 secondsStandard Error 5.4
p-value: 0.61Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Mean Peak Rating of Drug Effect (0-100) as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale

Mean peak of Visual Analog Scale ratings of Drug Effect (0-100) compared across each study condition, with higher ratings reflecting stronger drug effects.

Time frame: 8-hour study session

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Placebo ConditionMean Peak Rating of Drug Effect (0-100) as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Placebo ConditionMean Peak Rating of Drug Effect (0-100) as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale51.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 2.5mgMean Peak Rating of Drug Effect (0-100) as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale55.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 5.0mgMean Peak Rating of Drug Effect (0-100) as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale55.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.3
Hydromorphone (Oral) 4mg + Dronabinol (Oral) 10mgMean Peak Rating of Drug Effect (0-100) as Measured by the Visual Analog Rating Scale56.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.7
p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026