Skip to content

Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine in Treatment Naive Autoimmune Hepatitis

A Randomised, Open-label Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine for Induction of Remission in Treatment Naive Autoimmune Hepatitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02900443
Acronym
CAMARO
Enrollment
70
Registered
2016-09-14
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autoimmune Hepatitis

Brief summary

Rationale: Current standard therapy of autoimmune hepatitis consists of a combination of prednisolone and azathioprine. However, a significant proportion of patients does not respond to, or is intolerant for, azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has surpassed azathioprine as therapy to prevent organ transplant rejection and is sometimes used as an alternative option for autoimmune hepatitis. Several case series and one prospective study have documented the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy for autoimmune hepatitis. Robust evidence from a formal randomized clinical trial is lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy in patients with treatment naive autoimmune hepatitis. Study design: Multicenter, randomised, open-label intervention study Study population: Patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune hepatitis who are in need of induction therapy according to current guidelines. Intervention: The intervention group will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil for 24 weeks. The control group will be treated with azathioprine for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent Clinical Practice Guidelines by the European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL). Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels after 24 weeks of treatment, per treatment group. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil, time to remission, changes in Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) -score (and its components bilirubin, INR, creatinine), albumin, pseudocholinesterase and N-terminal procollagen-III-peptide, ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis) -score and aspects of quality of life.

Interventions

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil
DRUGAzathioprine

Sponsors

Leiden University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Probable or definite diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis according to the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Study Group criteria * First presentation of AIH requiring treatment according to the current EASL guidelines * Age ≥ 18 years * Must provide informed consent and agree to comply with the trial protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Overlap syndrome with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) or Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) (Paris criteria, strong positive Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies (AMA), past liver biopsy or cholangiographic findings compatible with PBC or PSC). * Presentation with acute liver failure, defined as presence of hepatic encephalopathy and coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5) * Current treatment with prednisone/prednisolone and/or immunosuppressive medication for an indication other than autoimmune hepatitis * Current systemic infection * Other clinically significant medical conditions that could interfere with the trial * If female of childbearing potential: known pregnancy, or unwilling to practice anticontraceptive measures. * History of noncompliance with medical regimens, or patients who are considered to be potentially unreliable or unable to participate * Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of informed consent or compliance with the trial is uncertain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biochemical remission24 weeksThe percentage of patients in biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum ALT and IgG levels after 24 weeks of treatment, per treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Biochemical remission at any timeUp to 24 weeks
Complete biochemical response, defined as normalization of AST, ALT and IgG at 6 months after initiation of treatmentUp to 24 weeks
Insufficient response, defined as lack of complete biochemical response determined at 6 monthsUp to 24 weeks
Non-response at 4 weeks: defined as <50% decrease of serum transaminases within 4 weeks after initiation of treatmentUp to 4 weeks
Changes in MELD score (and its components bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), creatinine) and in albuminUp to 24 weeks
Changes in liver stiffness, measured by transient elastographyUp to 24 weeks
N-terminal procollagen-III-peptide, ELF score24 weeks
Changes in quality of life measured with SF-36Up to 24 weeks
Time to biochemical remission24 weeks
The level of ALT, AST, GGT in both groupsUp to 24 weeks
Percentage of patients with biochemical remissionUp to 24 weeks
Ratio of ALT to lowest ALT everUp to 24 weeks
Extrahepatic AIH manifestations (e.g. arthralgia)Up to 24 weeks
Patient survivalUp to 24 weeks
Fatigue indexUp to 24 weeks
Pruritis VAS scoreUp to 24 weeks
Difference in cumulative corticosteroid dose between MMF and azathioprineUp to 24 weeks
Difference in side-effects, adverse events and serious adverse eventsUp to 24 weeks

Countries

Belgium, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026