Skip to content

Rates of Recovery From Strenuous Exercise in Physically Active Older Adults

Rates of Recovery From Strenuous Exercise in Physically Active Older Adults

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02899650
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-09-14
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2017-09-01
Last updated
2021-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscles

Keywords

Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness, Eccentric exercise, Masters athlete

Brief summary

The purpose of this study to determine if older adults who are healthy and physically active (i.e., Masters athletes) demonstrate slower rates of recovery from unaccustomed strenuous exercise of downhill running than younger peers.

Detailed description

There is a well-conceived notion that the recovery from strenuous exercise gets slower as individuals get older in age. Studies using animal models have demonstrated that stretching of electrically-activated skeletal muscle to mimic eccentric muscle contractions results in a greater decline and slower recovery in muscular force in old mice than in young mice. Similarly, in human studies using sedentary adults, age has been associated with a slower rate of recovery from a series of eccentric contractions. However, the process of aging is often confounded by coexisting diseases and gradual sedentary lifestyles that progress with advancing aging. Could older adults who are apparently healthy and habitually exercising demonstrate slower rates of recovery from strenuous exercise? In a small-scale study, recreationally-active middle-aged adults did not display a slower recovery from unaccustomed eccentric exercise than young adults. Masters athletes are an effective experimental model to address this question as extrinsic factors (e.g., deconditioning, chronic degenerative diseases) that often confound the intrinsic aging process can be minimized in this population. As no study has been conducted in Masters athletes, it is unknown if Masters athletes would experience slower rates of recovery similar to their sedentary peers. With this information as background, the general aim of the proposed study is to determine if older adults who are healthy and physically active demonstrate slower rates of recovery from unaccustomed strenuous exercise of downhill running than younger peers. In an attempt to properly determine the influence of aging and regular physical activity, 4 groups of apparently healthy adults, including young sedentary, young trained, older sedentary, and older trained adults, will be studied. A total of 60 apparently healthy men and women will serve as subjects. Half will be young \[18-40-year-old (n=30)\] and the other half older \[50-80-year-old (n=30)\]. After the screening and familiarization, investigators will ask participants to visit the laboratory four times (four consecutive days) to perform downhill running and to test physiological measurements (muscular strength, pain scale, range of motion, arterial stiffness and blood pressure and blood creatinine and myoglobin concentrations).

Interventions

OTHERexercise

acute downhill running

Sponsors

University of Texas at Austin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Sedentary (exercise \< 1 time/week) or well-trained individuals (exercise ≧ 2 times/week) * Ages 18-39 and 50-80 years * Individuals who can safely exercise

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who reports Symptoms or Signs Suggestive of Disease on the Health Research Questionnaire (heart and respiratory problems, dizziness and ankle edema). * Individuals who report substance abuse within the last 6 months (elicit drugs, alcohol) * Smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Force DevelopmentAfter the downhill running protocol, various markers of muscle damage and muscular strength were obtained 24 hours post (the third visit), 48 hours post (the forth visit) and 72 hours post (the fifth visit).Rate of force development are measured by determining peak torque achieved on an isometric leg extension machine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain ScaleAfter the downhill running protocol, muscle damage pain scale was measured 24 hours post (the third visit), 48 hours post (the forth visit) and 72 hours post (the fifth visit).Pain scale on quadriceps muscle was assessed using a validated visual pain scale. The scale was on a 10-point scale (0 being absence of soreness, 10 being worst imaginable soreness).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We planned to recruit a total of 60 participants. However, we were not able to recruit older unfit adults so this group was dropped from the study. Additionally, this was a research project conducted by a visiting scholar and his departure approached quickly so the study was closed prematurely with smaller numbers in each group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Young Fit
Young (18-39 yrs) people who have endurance training habit
15
Young Unfit
Young (18-39 yrs) people who have sedentary lifestyle
10
Older Fit
Older (50-80 yrs) people who have endurance training habit
14
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicYoung FitYoung UnfitOlder FitTotal
Age, Continuous
Age
27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants10 Participants13 Participants37 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants8 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 100 / 140 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 100 / 140 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 100 / 140 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Force Development

Rate of force development are measured by determining peak torque achieved on an isometric leg extension machine.

Time frame: After the downhill running protocol, various markers of muscle damage and muscular strength were obtained 24 hours post (the third visit), 48 hours post (the forth visit) and 72 hours post (the fifth visit).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Young FitRate of Force DevelopmentBaseline102 NmStandard Error 3
Young FitRate of Force Development24h post97 NmStandard Error 3
Young FitRate of Force Development48h post100 NmStandard Error 2
Young FitRate of Force Development72h post102 NmStandard Error 2
Young UnfitRate of Force Development72h post105 NmStandard Error 4
Young UnfitRate of Force DevelopmentBaseline108 NmStandard Error 4
Young UnfitRate of Force Development48h post106 NmStandard Error 5
Young UnfitRate of Force Development24h post106 NmStandard Error 4
Older FitRate of Force Development72h post103 NmStandard Error 2
Older FitRate of Force Development24h post100 NmStandard Error 3
Older FitRate of Force Development48h post103 NmStandard Error 3
Older FitRate of Force DevelopmentBaseline100 NmStandard Error 2
Secondary

Pain Scale

Pain scale on quadriceps muscle was assessed using a validated visual pain scale. The scale was on a 10-point scale (0 being absence of soreness, 10 being worst imaginable soreness).

Time frame: After the downhill running protocol, muscle damage pain scale was measured 24 hours post (the third visit), 48 hours post (the forth visit) and 72 hours post (the fifth visit).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Young FitPain Scale72h post2.7 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.5
Young FitPain ScaleBaseline0.2 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.1
Young FitPain Scale48h post4.2 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.6
Young FitPain Scale24h post3.7 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.5
Young UnfitPain Scale48h post4.9 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.7
Young UnfitPain Scale72h post3.2 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.8
Young UnfitPain ScaleBaseline0.1 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.1
Young UnfitPain Scale24h post4.7 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.6
Older FitPain Scale72h post1.5 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.4
Older FitPain Scale24h post2.4 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.6
Older FitPain Scale48h post2.7 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0.6
Older FitPain ScaleBaseline0.0 arbitrary scale unit from 0 to 10Standard Error 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026