Skip to content

Neurophysiological Correlates of Cognitive Tasks in Healthy Volunteers -WP3 P003

Neurophysiological Correlates of Cognitive Tasks in Healthy Volunteers -A Pilot Study WP3 P003

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02899403
Acronym
PharmacogWP3
Enrollment
6
Registered
2016-09-14
Start date
2017-05-19
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC VARIANT PATTERN 1 (Disorder)

Keywords

Cognitive Tasks, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Neurophysiological Correlates, Healthy Volunteers

Brief summary

In the perspective to better evaluate the efficacy of new treatment strategies for Alzheimer disease (AD), it appears important to develop experimental paradigms to precisely measure cognitive endpoints/biomarkers that may be used in healthy volunteers as tools to validate drug efficacy profile. The use of Electroencephalography (EEG) may be, therefore, a good candidate. The purpose of the present study is to use EEG to more precisely explore cognitive processes in healthy subjects, with a particular interest in episodic and working memory functions that are usually altered in both AD and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) as well as to better understand underlying neural mechanisms involved in these processes.

Interventions

OTHERRapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) test

Rapid Visual Information Processing is a measure of sustained attention.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Right-handed * In good health on the basis of the medical interview (medical history, symptoms), the physical examination and vital signs * Non smoker and with no history of drug or alcohol abuse * Without chronic treatment * With normal hearing and normal vision including color (with correction) * French speaker and able to understand the test instructions * Has provided written informed consent * Able to read and understand the Information Form and comply with the protocol instructions and restrictions

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment (MoCA \< 26) * Cognitive complaint (MacNair Scale \> 15) * History of brain disease (severe brain trauma, stroke, cerebral tumor…) or current cerebral disease * Major medical or surgical history * Current chronic disease * Vascular or metabolic risk factor * History or current mental disease or addiction (MINI) * Family history of young onset dementia * Family history of chronic or severe neurological or mental disease (first degree relatives) * In the opinion of the investigator, is unlikely to comply with the study protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason * Participates to another clinical trial or is still being within a washout period of a previous clinical trial * Already exposed to cognitive tests used in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EEG spectral power during RVIP task as compared to resting statewithin 7 days after inclusion ( session1)The Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP®) is a test of sustained attention and has proved useful in many studies in which drugs are used to help develop a disease model. It is sensitive to dysfunction in the parietal and frontal lobe areas of the brain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EEG spectral power during PRM task as compared to resting statewithin 7 days after inclusion ( session1)the Pattern Recognition Memory (PRM®) is a test assessing visual recognition memory, considered as a sensitive measure of medial temporal areas dysfunction. It is a useful tool for assessing patients with MCI and AD
RVIP latency of responseswithin 7 days after inclusion ( session1) and within 7days after session 1 (=session2)
PRM number of errorswithin 7 days after inclusion ( session1) and within 7 days after session 1 (=session2)
PRM latency of responseswithin 7 days after inclusion (=session1) and within 7 days after session 1 (=session2)
difference between session 2 and session 1 EEG Spectral power during RVIP taskat 7 days after session 1

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDominique Deplanque, MD, PhD

University Hospital, Lille

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026