Skip to content

Effect of Body Representation in Movement

Effect of Body Representation in Movement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02898558
Enrollment
25
Registered
2016-09-13
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2017-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

This study explores the possible implications of the increase in perceived body size for rehabilitation of motor functions. In a recent study we have tested if motor abilities of patients with stroke improve wearing magnifying lenses, showing that a beneficial effect of magnifying lenses can be observed in some patients. In the present study, we will identify 12 patients from this cohort who demonstrated an improvement greater than 10% in one or two motor task when wearing magnifying glasses. These participants will be invited to take part in a clinical study in which they will undergo a training phase: subjects will wear magnifying lenses at home for 30 minutes daily for 14 days while completing a jigsaw puzzle; a log will be kept to document participation. Participants' performance on different motor tasks will be assessed before, immediately after and 1 month after the training session. Standardized measures of motor performance will include the the Action Research Arm test and the Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP). In addition, participants will undergo grip strength, finger tapping tasks and a reaching and grasping task. We expect the repeated use of magnifying lenses to generate an improvement of patients' performance across tasks and this effect to be persistent in time.

Detailed description

Altering the apparent size of a body part with magnifying changes tactile acuity, tactile distance judgments and pain perception. In a recent study we have tested if motor abilities (grip strength, finger tapping and reaching and grasping) of patients with stroke improve wearing magnifying lenses. The results of this study showed that a beneficial effect of magnifying lenses on movement can be observed in some patients with stroke. The present study aims at following up these results and investigating the possible use of magnifying lenses in the rehabilitation to improve motor controls of stroke patients. To pursuit this aim, we will identify 12 patients in our previous study cohort who demonstrated an improvement greater than 10% in the grip strength or finger tapping task when wearing magnifying glasses. These participants will be invited to take part in the present clinical study in which they will undergo a training phase: subjects will wear magnifying lenses at home for 30 minutes daily for 14 days while completing a jigsaw puzzle; a log will be kept to document participation. Participants' performance on different motor tasks will be assessed before, immediately after and 1 month after the training session. Standardized measures of motor performance will include the the Action Research Arm test and the Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP). In addition, participants will undergo grip strength (6 trials), finger tapping tasks (6 trials) and a reaching and grasping task, inn which they will be asked to reach and grasp 3 different objects (30 trials). We expect the repeated use of magnifying lenses to generate an improvement of patients' performance across task and this effect to be persistent in time.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMagnification hand size

Participants will use magnifying lenses while completing a jigsaw puzzle for 30 min a day for 14 days.

DEVICEmagnifying lenses

Sponsors

Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from stroke who showed an improvement with magnifying lenses in our previous study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from stroke who did not show an improvement with magnifying lenses in our previous study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Action Research Arm testBaseline, immediately after the training (two weeks) and after one month19 item measure of motor control (i.e. (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Max score is 57

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory PerformanceBaseline, immediately after the training (two weeks) and after one monthBattery designed to test somatosensory functions, comprising of 7 subtests (sharp/dull discrimination, surface pressure touch, surface localization, sensory extinction, two-point discrimination, temperature discrimination, proprioception movement and direction discrimination). Max score for each subtest is 60, except for sensory extinction (max is 12) and two-point discrimination (fail or pass).
Grip strengthBaseline, immediately after the training (two weeks) and after one monthA grip dynamometer measures participants' grip strength
Finger tappingBaseline, immediately after the training (two weeks) and after one monthElectronic tapping test measures participants' tapping rate of the index finger
Reach and graspingBaseline, immediately after the training (two weeks) and after one monthMotion tracking equipment used to measure participants kinematic parameters (movement time, peak velocity, grip aperture, etc.) when reaching and grasping 3 objects, for a total of 30 movements.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026